Why does being a logically consistent, analytically-minded philosopher blend so well with being a Christian?

Why does being a logically consistent, analytically-minded philosopher blend so well with being a Christian?

Because God willed it.

You mean deist or non-specific theist, all religious philosophers are disregarding irrational beliefs like the resurrection of Jesus when they do philosophy, just like all religious scientists are naturalists when they do science.

Because analytic philosophy is theology in disguise.
Protip: Check Kripke.

KRIPKE

These cringey hyperpious larpposts really are the tombstone of christianity. It's just a nice obscurity people fondly remember.

>The Resurrection
>irrational

See? No christian would ever write that. They know that their claim violates rationality. Which is exactly why it's a miracle. But honesty is with what people who believe their faith CAN be defended in face of truth handle these issues.
The christlarper doesn't trust in christianity so he tries to sidestep these problems by acting hyperpiously and scolding the people for ignorance who dare not play along.

What is the empirical or rational proof of Jesus being God and ressurected?
It's indeed only a belief, irrational in the broad sense of term (I'm not implying religious people are crazy or dumb) because you just have to have faith in it.

Because Analphil is just a much, much (very much) watered down version of ancient Greek phil

>See? No christian would ever write that. They know that their claim violates rationality.
How? What is the extent of rational claims?

William Lane Craig addresses the factual evidence of The Resurrection.

...

Someone add analytic autism at the bottom
Thanks

Kierkegaard and Spengler should be watching on the side.

...

people rising from the dead is the most irrational claim you could possibly make

Yes. And I found it unconvincing. As did you otherwise you would have recalled his best argument rather than to appeal to his authority

Frankly the claims to authority of the bible die with proven lies to manufacture messianic prophesies. Like the census that never happened.

Not irrational if you believe in God.
Just because you don't find it compelling doesn't mean the Resurrection is "just" a belief for all Christians.

>Not irrational if you believe in God.
You can believe in God and not the resurrection of Jesus though, like non-christian monotheists (jews, muslims and some hindus) and deists.

And? Doesn't make belief in the Resurrection inherently irrational.

>In the beginning was the logos, and the logos was with god, and the logos was god