Is Buckley worth reading or nah?
Is Buckley worth reading or nah?
Sebastian Gray
Other urls found in this thread:
Jaxon Butler
Whatever happened to headlines?
Christian James
can you not read the headline? Obviously not. The Standard of all Objectivity condemned him
Colton Brooks
Buckley was a jewish pet, so no. But the people he purged for his jewish masters like Revilo Oliver are.
Thomas Mitchell
is he the guy who regularly got destroyed by gore vidal, or was that some other buckley?
Joshua Gonzalez
His writing is about as informative as his interviews...so, not very.
Lucas Lee
The only good conservative is a dead conservative.
Liam Martin
He failed to control his temper, called Vidal a queer on live TV, and basically nothing else happened.
Alexander Bell
Useless boomer conservatism and right wing gatekeeper
Charles Long
>The Objective Standard
kali yuga pls
Jaxson White
I like him. He was very charming. I don't care if he wasn't a top tier intellectual. I'm not some nerdy virgin.
Kevin Cruz
>implying the world doesn’t need gatekeepers
Aiden Parker
No, he's objectively cowardly, dishonest, unjust, and racist.
Gavin Ortiz
>anyone
>destroyed by gore vidal
Ian Jenkins
He did manage to embarrass a drunk Norman Mailer.
Thomas Jackson
Is that the
>Once again, words fail Normal Mailer
quip I hear every now and then?
Blake Torres
nah, the only people who like buckley are middle aged balding white conservatives who have a hard-on for Edmund Burke (despite having never read a work of him)
Kayden Johnson
...
Dominic Bailey
Buckley was in the right. Gore was being a little cunt.
Ryan James
>buck tries to stay on topic and discuss the issue
>gore: 'yeah? well you're a nazi'
Whoa, blown the fuck out.
Gavin Bennett
>Mike Stoklasa
>psuedo-intellectual
How stupid are you, exactly?
Joseph Gray
Yes, he's worth reading. Ignore all the baiting ITT.
Josiah Barnes
>I like him. He was very charming.
are you a woman? that is literally something that a housewife would say.
Nathaniel Torres
>subjective qualifications
>t. The Objective Standard
Nolan Hill
The fact that he's being called all those names means he was saying something interesting—and probably intelligent too, because if it wasn't intelligent then his detractors would just counter his arguments rather than calling him names.
Leo Turner
I'm convinced.
Nicholas Cruz
Most aesthetic way of speaking English desu
Hunter Torres
I swear i saw a version with reviewbrah
Luke Garcia
>if it wasn't intelligent then his detractors would just counter his arguments rather than calling him names
this notion is completely removed from human behavior