Post Veeky Forums magazines and journals

My man

Neocons and drumpftards can eat it

I think National Affairs is pretty Veeky Forums for a current events and politics journal

Attached: private eye.jpg (500x710, 45K)

claremont review of books
occidental observer
social matter

jacobitemag.com

American Conservative would be great if it wasnt for Drehr and Buchanan

Also this

trash

Just asking, but this is impossible to understand if you're not British right? I tried reading it once and I just didn't grasp a single paragraph.

London Review of Books and New York Review of Books are just great.

And National Geographic for in between.

twitter.com

>London Review of Books and New York Review of Books are just great.

If they arent pushing cultural progressive diversity drek they are using non-fiction work reviews as a soapbox for their own views, and recently have started publishing screeds with no review attached. 9/10 garbage unfortunately, with the occasional solid review of a nice piece from the NYRB publishing house.

everyone doest that

This. Can't stand either of them.

always liked this takedown of the shitonomist
theatlantic.com/technology/archive/1991/10/-quot-the-economics-of-the-colonial-cringe-quot-about-the-economist-magazine-washington-post-1991/7415/

>Veeky Forums magazines and journals
the april review
pinecone mag
unless I missed a formation, that's all

Are you retarded?

LRB is my go-to cosy morning read.

>how X saved my life
is this the ultimate pleb title?

>Veeky Forums x
Don't you ever try to idpol lit again you massive fucking faggot.
For a journal that I like, as a patrician of full status, see pic related.

Attached: images(3).jpg (276x182, 9K)

adding to this
frontiers journals
>OA
>large community
>high impact
>interdisciplinary by nature
the journals i like are ecology and evolution, marine science, microbiology and environmental science

Attached: images.duckduckgo.com.png (255x224, 25K)

and definitely this one and its sister journals

Attached: images.duckduckgo.comq.png (600x789, 653K)

Monthly Review

ofc ESA and BES journals
Progress in x
procedings of the royal society
to many to name really, now i will move on to more philosophical and theoretical journals
(my nigga)
quality socialism, i wish English anarchist publications would get their shit together
non doctrinal Marxists are the only tolerable Marxists. Still many don't understand that dialectical materialism is a heuristic and confuse it for science. Personally i think its high time that Marxism and all social theory is digested by the life sciences. The problem is the humanities, social sciences are compartmentalized so its paradigms are fairly persistent. Thats rapidly changing but there are still significant barriers to such unification. such as; the fact that its all heavily haunted by epistemological Cartesianism and mostly oblivious to that fact. the materialist dogma that is blindly accepted and the centuries of methodology built on materialism. In the life sciences you have a widespread practice of charlatan scientists misusing quantification to seem like they are doing ebin important research, which produces and perpetuates a culture that only wants science if its in an equation, which is a huge barrier, this is slowly changing in the important fields, then you have anthropocentrism especially in the humanities and social sciences which creates another arbitrary barrier, that's changing fast

Attached: ESA_HubPage_FinalFan.jpg (610x356, 162K)

I feel like with the social sciences we are on the level of pre-Newtonian physics. Nobody can agree on the methodology, there are heaps of totally divergent explanatory principles, outdated schematisms etc.
Marxism itself is a historical theory so there is no problem of its basic method being revised, in my opinion. The idea that persistent social relations develop as a result of material production of necessities, and how these relations interact back and forth with more complex forms of social organization - is a very intuitive idea, which seems to me borne out by looking at history. Both Marx and Engels opposed turning their analysis into an eternally applicable schema of economic determinism, so I've yet to see the basic concept of historical materialism refuted which doesn't rely on this meme strawman, usually taken from ML formulations.

I like this one.

Attached: images (5).png (530x143, 6K)

Jacobite is leagues ahead of the others

It's actually about how he overcame his mid life existential crises, made peace with his family after he discovered they secretly hated him, and discovered a way of looking at life made him a million times happier.
But of course make assumptions without ever reading the book retard.

Pravda/Iskra

>and discovered a way of looking at life made him a million times happier.

tell us more about this "way of looking at life".

And what did he to to

"overcame his mid life existential crises".

I still bet that he found Christ and discover that there is a life after death.

youtube.com/watch?v=1jHU2bbLJIQ

>made peace with his family after he discovered they secretly hated him
by making them hate him openly?

fuck off, the guy is a turbo-christian, and his book is all about "me, me me" and "muh feelings" and how "Christ love me".

It's trash.

Only acceptable answer.

Attached: der_stürmer.jpg (460x626, 82K)

>national geographic
>in between
>credible at all

Attached: JUST CUCK MY SHIT UP.jpg (800x576, 211K)

i dont get why everyone is so upset about this. just let the fags have their genders, its actually really interesting from an anthropological perspective.
the incessant bitching of you people is equivalent to talking in the movie theater, which is also somewhat interesting in its own right, but im getting kinda sick of your shit so stfu and watch the show.

Crossword's good too.

American Journal of Philology.

Attached: 1513157730530.jpg (455x650, 96K)

>A magazine reporting on a change that is occurring in society
Wow senpai what a shock

>senpai
Gas all nippon-sympathizers.

This idea of gender politics is mostly a neo-liberal infatuation, not a leftist one. I don't see the harm in it, and as said, it's more interesting than harmful.

>>A magazine reporting on a change that is occurring in society
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

hownew.ru

unrelated, some blogs
slatestarcodex.com/
areomagazine.com/
marginalrevolution.com/
reddit.com/r/Economics/wiki/blogs
quillette.com/
jacobitemag.com/
thephilosophersmeme.com/

Kill yourself immediately

Attached: 5F38648C-06C0-47F3-A202-2048926D49D5.jpg (870x652, 156K)

>the editor-in-chief of National Geographic is called Susan Goldberg

I think I’m noticing a certain pattern..

I don't see how neo-liberal isn't leftist.

Do you think Margaret Thatcher is a leftist?

>i don't see how unchecked capitalism isn't leftist
okay

Neoliberals do not want to overthrow capitalism so autistic marxists don't consider them leftists. It's like how autistic lolbertarians consider everyone who doesn't want to dismantle the state leftist.

Rod 'Everything I dislike is nominalism' Dreher

>one book review 30 years ago was bad, so the whole magazine is bad

... but wouldn't that by definition not make them leftists? Leftism exists in opposition to capitalism

the original leftists were literally liberals as in classical liberals, not as in pink haired homos

>Drehr
whats wrong with him?

The French Revolution was 200 plus years ago. Get with the times grandpa. Also there is no guarantee the classical liberals then won't be the pink haired homo now

Sure, but considering the term later and more commonly came to mean those favouring redistributive economies instead of capitalist ones, it seems kind of disingenuous to suggest neo-liberals fall on the left of the current political spectrum.

weren't neolibs followers of Foucault? or was that neocons? i got lost with so much neostuff

the meme youre thinking of is the one that clains neocons were converted trotskysts m8

> economics
> Veeky Forums
Jesus Christ.

To answer OP, Lapham’s Quaterly is pretty comfy.

New Atlantis always has something gucci.

I think his main problem is that he blogs, usually multiple times a day. That mode of writing turns makes a lot of his stuff repetitive, fluffy, or sensational. I don't think he's a bad guy, even though I don't agree with everything he says, I find his perspective interesting and reasonably intelligent. But if he didn't feel the need to push out a blogpost for every little article he reads, his writing would be a lot better.

Larison is also a victim of this to a certain extent.

That's unironically a great magazine.

The original classical liberals were literal socialists who believed that wage labour is alienating and almost indistinguishable from slavery.

>The economist
No thanks

Hello John Money