Darwin is more relevant to contemporary discourse than Hegel.
Marcus Aurelius is for Reddit pseuds.
Elijah Morales
Why is the unabomer on there?
Kayden Torres
Because he is a very famous author with influencial work What are you a square?
Angel Torres
I think the Unabomber and Varg Vikernes are supposed to be /pol/ memes.
Josiah Robinson
Unabomber isn't really /pol/
Brayden Reyes
>presocratics >Diogenes FUCK OFF
Zachary Carter
John Locke and Stuart Mill should be done in the same style as Russell.
Aaron Flores
this is sort of reddit but diogenes, nietzsche and Heidegger made me laugh
Michael Young
This is true
Ayden Cox
Doing my disseration on Heraclitus boys.
Fucking brilliant studying a philosopher which academia can't decide what's right and what's wrong about him. I can say pretty much whatever and my supervisor goes "Yeah that seems to make sense."
Nicholas Gonzalez
Why is Freud included here but not Jung?
Blake Williams
Because the image in the OP was made before Memerson got famous for arguing with trannies and Jung was still a historical curiosity to everyone here
Matthew Bennett
I read Jung before I read anything by Freud but clearly that's just me. Who the fuck is Memerson?
Even then, what's a psychologist doing on a picture concerning Philosophers?
Wyatt Richardson
He's more /pol/ than Veeky Forums.
Brayden Mitchell
Can we get one with eastern philosophers?
James Rivera
Besides Confucius, Sun Tzu and Nichiren who is there?
Lucas Nguyen
>Even then, what's a psychologist doing on a picture concerning Philosophers? Not sure if you're talking about Jung or Peterson, but I suppose he's there for the same reason that Physicists, Economists, and Biologists are there. A philosophy can be derived from his findings and observations.
Eli Perry
>Hegel isn't relevant to contemporary discourse >Whig History isn't relevant to contemporary discourse >Contemporary ideas of the dialectic aren't relevant to contemporary discourse Holy fuck you are a dumb stupid man