Need some help with the names

doesn't look like kant desu
doesn't look like kant either

isn't kant supposed to wear something brown?

The one between Hegel and Schopenhauer is Goethe. The one between Kierkegaard and Schopenhauer is Adam Smith. The one between DFW and Foucault is Bloom. The tiny face one is Kant

I think it’s based on this pic. It’s not that recognizable, but I think that’s what the original poster intended.

Attached: 9F711D62-1E87-44CA-8B77-7717D6EF2A46.jpg (710x735, 206K)

Attached: Wittgengrug.png (541x505, 84K)

leibniz and spinoza and descartes are works of art

Kant has a very small face in some of his portraits

Attached: 480px-Immanuel_Kant_(portrait).jpg (480x599, 101K)

Its really to emphasize his titanic forehead

Russell is a brainlet, and analytic philsophy was an obstacle we had to overcome, but we finnally made it. When Russel had his day, the spotlight should have been showing on based Peirce instead.

Rainbow man is terrance the LSD fairy McKenna.

Tiny man is Nauseous Sartre.

>unabomber
>varg
>no simulacrum man

The image has blanks for a reason. Anyone can make more

Attached: 1489549482502.png (485x443, 22K)

Attached: 1512783050068.png (485x443, 26K)

I don't know a lot about Russell's philosophy but he did big things in logic and maths that I think disqualify him from being a true brainlet.

>but he did big things in logic and maths

Such as?

he figured out that all bachelor's are unmarried, gotta love the deep insights of the analytics

He invented type theory

Oh woah, people never knew there could be types of things before Russel!?

He btfo Sets Theory with his paradox.

>t. mathlet

Language game

I'm actually literally a computer scientist, the most applicable field to ""type theory"". Its horseshit though, philosophic gibberish trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist

Why did you say you were a computer scientist when we already determined you don't know math?

If you say so buddy

>Thales, Pythagoras and Socrates are drawn as brainlets
>Jesus isn't
>Aquinas isn't
>Hegel isn't
>Marx isn't
>FREUD ISN'T
Dropped.

Attached: 1520776885791.jpg (316x202, 7K)

They're all drawn as brainlets actually

don't forget Kongzi

Attached: 1518303154312.png (494x443, 53K)

Make a Céline one

Attached: celine-louis-ferdinand-TELEMAGAZINE.png (619x800, 542K)

hot off the presses

Attached: Untitled.png (663x570, 45K)

No Cicero?

chmosky is baudrillard

No Sadler grug? No Cliff grug?

post the original

Anyone have the original?

Attached: 1518141309928.png (3472x3262, 3.44M)

Quelle decadence

Attached: not amused.jpg (1024x801, 141K)

Attached: Bertrand Gruggell.jpg (673x547, 70K)

HA

Surprised he did say he was an engineer and he didn't know math

Left of Schopenhauer is Goethe

Are you American?

>virgil
That's clearly Machiavelli

Attached: niccolo-machiavelli-9392446-1-402.jpg (300x300, 10K)

That's Thoreau not lincoln
the tiny head in second to last row is sartre
drooling guy same row is camus

I think these guys are right

The one that you labeled as Chomsky is actually Harold Bloom.

But that's Kant

Zizek needs to be updated post-palsy, poor fucker

Add frege

Attached: 220px-Young_frege.jpg (219x297, 11K)

Attached: McKenna.gif (309x360, 309K)

It’s Nabakov

The Camus look-alike is Pynchon

Isn't type theory important to type systems, thus to programming, thus to the world's technological infrastructure?

>pythagoras --> democritus
>augustine --> thomas aquinas
>thomas aquinas --> thomas aquinas
fixed some of those for you

The one just to the left of vonnegut? is i think kerouac

Why the fuck is fucking Burzum on there

Contrary to what Russell shills would have you think, he didn't invent the notion of assigning to types to propositional actors and he had zero part in the actual mathemathics that rendered the practice useful
Meanwhile in actual symbolic logic (the domain where Russell was actually working) type theory has no applicable worth, a failed attempt to reconcile problems with set theory that didn't even exist to begin with

Its the Pynch

Attached: 123435232.jpg (267x189, 8K)

It's Camus

>Putting Vikernes on the same chart as Shakespeare, Plato or Jesus

Daring times we live in

hes great desu

Here you go.

Attached: Cormac McCarthy.png (485x443, 23K)

Pretty sure that's not Thomas Aquinas, but Luther

definitely this

NEED that Zizek Grug.

Pythagoras is Democritus
Augustine is Aquinas
Paul is Aurelius
Aquinas is Luther
Left of Hegel is Kant
Left of Camus is Sartre

>that limited wojak variation
Why

They're not wojaks, they're gruggs

Grug prefer no

who is this

Grigory Sandler

Attached: nabokov.png (638x779, 35K)

need a grug of virginia woolf.

>why is Uwe Boll on this chart?

get

Why does Aquinas look like DFW?

Kek

Attached: degrugtre.jpg (567x448, 38K)

The guy you said was Lincoln might have been Thoreau. He lived in a cabin by a lake for over two years, writing.

thank you so much, I couldn't be arsed to read the fucking thread either

what the hell, since when was there a distinction

Gruggs are a new variant that have gained enough of a life of their own to keep a name.

Attached: la existance.jpg (713x443, 330K)

who's the 'rainbow' one?

TERRANCE MCKENNA YOU FUCKING STEMKEK

t-thank you senpai

diminutive numinous goblin

Attached: mckenna.jpg (615x383, 94K)

Bill Hicks please

Lmao

Can anyone dump these one by one?

I can dump the ones I made

Attached: kierkegrug.jpg (862x643, 82K)

Attached: Agruggas.jpg (868x1046, 175K)

Attached: Heidegrugg.jpg (481x432, 46K)

Attached: karl grug.jpg (992x898, 146K)