Had had

>had had

Attached: 10c.jpg (640x548, 26K)

>the The

Attached: sm.jpg (255x247, 11K)

nothing wrong with this grammatically

>grammatically

Attached: eef7fb4a78635733fe451acf7078a371.jpg (218x218, 49K)

>edited it

That that had had that that that had had had had that that that had, had that that that had had had that that that had had.

Attached: 1521398745405.jpg (686x718, 67K)

Attached: english,nigger,doyouspeakit.png (1276x620, 84K)

"..and all the cake could of had had been thrown away."

Nothing wrong with that.

I'm not him, but there are a lot of words that shouldn't be used that are in the dictionary.

He probably doesn't like that word for some reason maybe there was a different way to say it that would have pleased him. Don't forget that the laughing emoji is a technical word according to some major dictionaries

Attached: bae.png (640x306, 11K)

notice the "informal" in italics--it's what sets slang apart from actual words. I don't understand what is wrong with "grammatically". It's a useful word

>cuck cuck

Great band, m8

are y'all dummies? he means saying "had had" is awful writing regardless of grammar

How is 'had had' awful? It's the pluperfect of 'have', literally perfect English.

i could give a FUCK about the purpleeffect, find a way to rewrite the sentence if you're about to say "had had". it breaks orwell's 6th rule of writing.

Using a perfectly fine tense of a verb does not 'break orwell's 6th rule', you tit.

>shouldn't ought

On the other hand, it breaks Orwell's 6th rule of writing.

>word word

Carl Jung says this in the first chapter of Memories, Dreams, Reflections so its acceptable imo..

>semiotics

Attached: e6c793f5498de248160d82ab38285eb6.jpg (400x400, 40K)

I like your photograph very much. I would like to sniff your anus and see your feet please.

>"..and all the cake could of had had been thrown away."
"could of" is incorrect, it is "could have"
so it would be
"..and all the cake could have been thrown away." to make it correct

try:
"...if I had had the keys to the door..."

>try:
>"...if I had had the keys to the door..."
Had I the keys to the door...

If all the cake I had had had been thrown away

>Had I had known I would have had to have some.

Attached: 1520148030148.png (291x288, 218K)

had had had had enough of people giving it shit for no reason

>adverb

Attached: Screen-Shot-2015-09-04-at-12.41.51-PM.png (200x200, 54K)

>Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

Attached: buffalo.jpg (1280x640, 415K)

>If all the cake I had had had been thrown away
Had someone disposed of all of the cake that I previously had...

that just made me come in my pants

James, while John had had "had," had had "had had." "Had had" had had a better ring to it, James thought.

I'd have had to have had

Attached: 1520552156586.jpg (562x530, 69K)

>that that

>Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
my packa fur niggas bout ta cross dis great plain
ma cow love do cocaine
I fuck a hot calf don even know ha name
i can by dat heiffa no weddin ring
ratha go eat some grains

>and but so

>insane = not sane
>involuntary = not voluntary
>inexpensive = not expensive
>inflammable = VERY FLAMMABLE

???

>inflammable = it can be inflamed.
The opposite would be uninflammable

>could of

Attached: trump react.png (1933x1450, 2.31M)

how long did that take you

>not but one

right, because to flame is not a verb, although that would be cool
Also, what's the difference between psychologic and psychological? philosophic/philosophical?

>I could give a fuck

>Adolph Blaine Charles David Earl Frederick Gerald Hubert Irvin John Kenneth Lloyd Martin Nero Oliver Paul Quincy Randolph Sherman Thomas Uncas Victor William Xerxes Yancy Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenbergerdorff, Senior had had pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis in Llanfairpwllgwyngyll.

>not unlike

Attached: executed.png (802x576, 249K)