I am a collectivist...

I am a collectivist, and I believe that socioeconomic class is a far more important group characteristic than race/culture/gender etc. What are some counter arguments to this which don't suck?

Attached: 37eb28a8b3450503e0125cb3ae396cf2.jpg (391x391, 37K)

Take it to Veeky Forums motherfucker. Mods! Mods!

There are none because genetics are far stronger than social class.

how about collectivism doesn't fucking work

write a reply to that garbage NYT article the other day claiming race was more important that class

read the spook man and realize your inconsistent notions of society and morality are retarded and gay

read wittgenstein and think about how to approach girls by being in control of the case, I swear I almost got it

Attached: 952bb75d9d8e93d78ac9310bcefb9976--trafalgar-law-one-piece.jpg (640x360, 36K)

Except for the fact that collectivism is literally the only thing that has ever worked.

stirner. the group is a spook

People move up and down the economic ladder, the "1%" keeps the same share of the pie but the people/families who actually compose those 1% are quite different over time. I won't bother searching for primary sources, Thomas Sowell talks about this at great length in Intellectuals and Society, check it if you want.