Harry Potter

That and a hack.

She's become one of those typical outspoken left-wing celebrities. Uses the Harry Potter series to inject her own politics into. Has the political brain of an 18-year old freshman at Berkeley

>Disgusting bigot
Do not forget what she did to the bankers.

She doesn't like racist Nazi's so now Veeky Forums suddenly hates her! I can't figure it out either.

>woman
>successful author
>liberal
of course Veeky Forums hates her

Something about her expression is off putting. She often looks like she's feigning an analytical mind with her her expressions. I've seen people that have a more genuine version of that. Hers looks so hammy. Granted she's being photograpphed there. Not when we are at our most authentic. But so many pictures of her give me that impression. I can't shake it.

They can't admit to enjoying HP in their childhood and have to reject it to appear as a tasteful western canon-reading pseuds.

Shes a smug coward, espousing left wing views but never writing it into her actual books when she wants to make money. She claimed dumbledore was gay AFTER the series had ended, and did not push to portray a gay relationship in the newest prequel movie, then she says Hermoine is actually black when its for some small play nobody cared about...oh, and she describes Hermoine as white more than once in the books.

She's a typical rich bitch virtue signalling. If she lived in 1950s America all her villains would be thinly veiled communist stand ins.

This.

Dumbledore was gay in DH you faggot

Right wing people don't like her because she frequently espouses left wing views.

Far-left people don't like her because she is too moderate, and supported Theresa May over Jeremy Corbyn because she thought he was a Socialist. Some also think all her revealing that Dumbledore is gay, Daniel Radcliffe is Chinese, etc., is pandering because she says so after the fact and never wrote it into the books.

I don't hate her. No one will believe this, which is why I don't mind sharing. She sucked me off to completion once. I found her to be a very distant lover. When we finished she was ice cold to me.

She was strictly mediocre at every point in her career, and is a woman. For this reason nobody intelligent takes her seriously, but that is not reason for hatred.

The reason for hatred is that she is outspoken in her mediocrity, and also a clueless leftist.

she's not a leftist anymore than the Koch brothers are right wingers you dumb faggot, stop saying stupid shit from the alternative news media. She's a progressive liberal, her ideal world is gay-nigger welfare capitalism not commie utopia

you didn't fuck her hard enough m8.

What's your political brain like?

bait

>"'s" plural on a literature forum

brainlet faggot

t. trumptard

>hurr durr liberals aren't leftists

The mantra of retarded manchildren across twitter, reddit, and, now that you've invaded, Veeky Forums

thanks for this

She can't write for shit, and although getting kids into reading is great, these kids often stick with Harry Potter right until they're full-functioning adults, holding HP in the highest of literary praise and not reading any proper literature because it 'doesn't compare'.

Also she's a left-wing, liberal celebrity who uses her books to push her shitty political agenda.

i dont know much about her but once i saw a twitter post of her that used one of her characters to make a political point and that i found unacceptable

Because she wont do porn

The dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1483297574286.jpg (1623x2886, 1.27M)

The movies are comfy af tho.
>All those scenes where its snowing on the castle

Say what you will about JK Rowling but at least King and George RR Martin dabbled in a lot of stories before writing their "Magnum opus".

A thread died for this repetitive, silly shit.

Attached: no one cares.jpg (180x101, 5K)

i want to hate fuck her and call her mommy desu

Attached: .jpg (317x400, 44K)

She's not left-wing in Britain, she supports the conservatives and she's a TERF. The left really don't like her.

why do all of you have a problem with harry potter? i don't see any problem with it. its a pretty good series. honestly, you guys are just being contrarian and pretending you're better than everyone else by saying hp is bad. a real literature fanatic would know harry potter is a good book, not only because it is written well, but also because of all the people who picked up reading thanks to it. have you idiots ever written something this good or influential? i dont think so

she's not a Tory, she's a New Labourite

Even worse. They tried to kill Corbyn.

It's decent for what it is but I don't like the consumerist personality behind it that seems to have taken over it lately because of "nerd culture".

lol all these edgy children talking shit 'cause she's famous and crazy successful. kekk

Because she's now a famous and celebrated author and they are not, despite being oh so much smarter and more talented than her.

>Tolkien
>shit

Attached: 1521236439090.jpg (480x480, 14K)

i don't hate her
i want to fuck her
while i have emma's feet in my mouth

Attached: johermione__oPt.jpg (450x730, 47K)

The only correct answer.

I hate that she's not currently having sex with me.

She kept going back and changing things that had no impact on the story: Dumbledores a fag, Hermione is a groid

She'd be ok if she stopped spouting nonsense on twitter.

That site was a mistake.

She's the most commercially successful author in history
And she's a woman

>Tfw she'll never sneak up to your bed at night slither in like a Basilisk and choke the life out of your dick with her horcrux-like pussy before saying, "Goodnight, son."

stole from facebook, but
"the harry potter franchise as a whole is a capitalist mishmash of fantasy tropes from the entire spectrum of the genre, from classic novels to board games, targeted at the YA market to maximize market gains. Every character is at their core irredeemable because their primary purpose is exploiting kids and teens to buy t-shirts with their favorite house, or jelly beans, or whatever"

>doesn't deserve the hatred
maybe she should learn to keep her mouth shut then.

She's not talented enough to be the cunt she is. You need to balance that kind of shit.

>not recognizing ancient, albeit still very delicious, pasta

Same. This thread a shit.

Why, cause he and Grindelwald were nerdbros? Or cause he wore a fly purple suit?

She's a hack who wrote hack books.

BASED

>Name character Lucius after Lucifer
>Is bad guy
Brilliant writing.

She's a virtue signalling cuckquean who has all the resources to do what she preaches but doesn't but expects the average commoner to. Reprehensible librul

>Armond and Bloom will never write a book together

A twenty-something nihilist NEET slightly on the spectrum

She looks like a fine cougar desu lads

she pretentious as fuck

I second that.

would you, Veeky Forums?

Attached: g.jpg (760x511, 84K)

Because she's such a boring spinster that she manages to make GRRM Martin look like Chuck fucking Bukowski.

This is blatant lies

Pretty much this. Regardless of your opinion on HP she's ruining the integrity of her work by continually adding political messages long after it finished. Her appeasement to pander to 'le SJW's' has made me lose all respect for her.

>constantly preaches about letting in immigrants while living in a £2.25m mansion
>wouldn't have to deal with any of the consequences of letting in said immigrants
>race pandering

fuck off

Attached: tCshggl.png (580x628, 294K)

i liked the amount of butthurt she caused with this
it's a fucking made up character, who cares if they're white or black or fucking green and orange stripes

>Daniel Radcliffe is Chinese
wat

>tfw JKR >>> Emma Watson

this but unironically

is this THE WALL mexico pay for??

u weren't a big guy 4 her lmao

my issue is that she repeatedly looks for ways to inject her completed books with current progressive ideals when that's not what she had in mind in the first place.

>Dumbledore is gay
> Lupin is supposed to be a stand in for siphilis

stuff like that. I like the books, I don't care that she's left wing and I don't hate her writing, but she's tactless and it's honestly sad how desperate she is to appeal to progressives.

maybe 20 years ago

Same here but with Jane Austen.

She's a terrible writer tho.

Yes yes yes mommy gib milkies

This is all you need to know, OP.

Attached: Rowling.png (1867x874, 246K)

I don't. I liked her books as a child. Since I don't know her personally, I can neither hate nor like her. She is just a person in the world who I know exists but will never meet.

I reserve my hate for people who have wronged me deeply and personally, because hating someone to the proper extent is an exhauting process and I can't be bothered hating people I've never met and who have done nothing to warrant the effort.

same but with Dickinson

and I don't mean the writer, my actual dick in my son

So many other female fantasy authors deserved more celebrity than this cunt.

Attached: Women-Warriors-Suvudu.jpg (433x319, 71K)

Based poster!

"Deh!"

Attached: 1521297774647.png (799x572, 463K)

I prefer her Twitter rants to her books. In one fell swoop she can piss off liberals, conservatives, and centrists. That's a legitimate talent and I respect her for it.

Attached: image.jpg (650x361, 47K)