MGT

of course not, but you should keep playing

is there any proof? Nowhere in that article does it day they actually found any malware

Those aren't my watches, those are the clients of scottrades.

Biggest scam ever.

>is there any proof?
No, none

I know I'm taking a risk but I'm hopeful it will work out. I'll wait until the hype dies down and the media loses interest and put a small amount into shorting it. I think it's a much safer trade, since most schmucks who bought this are just as impulsive when selling as they were buying this failed abortion of a stock.

When you calling for that?

Moxie Marlinspike, who developed the encryption protocol used in WhatsApp and assisted in implementing it, told Gizmodo that McAfee also admitted his plan to him. “Some reporters that had been contacted by McAfee about a demo [...] got in touch with me,” Marlinspike told Gizmodo. “I talked to McAfee on the phone, he reluctantly told me that it was a malware thing with pre-cooked phones, and all the outlets he’d contacted decided not to cover it after he gave them details about how it’d work.”

Here is a full statement sent to Gizmodo after a phone interview with John McAfee. The phone interview discussed whether McAfee had hacked WhatsApp and whether he tried to mislead reporters. The “article” in question is the piece in Cybersecurity Ventures:

>Here is my formal response - written:

>I, perhaps wrongly, assume that people actually read articles that interest them rather than just headlines. If you actually READ the article, which you apparently did not, I made it absolutely CLEAR that was was NOT a WhatsApp issue. It was a Google issue. You slam me for tweeting an article, who’s headline you do not like. Surely, the article is what is important, not the headline. If I am wrong, them we as a society, are fucked Please quote me word for word if you have the fucking balls. Which, I know in advance, you do not.

>Of course the phones had malware on them. How that malware got there is the story, which we will release after speaking with Google. It involves a serious flaw in the Android architecture.

Update: This post has been updated to include more details about McAfee being shifty with the press, and to specify the nature of Gizmodo’s inquiries to McAfee for comment.

Holy shit, seems like I've missed something here. Good job anons.

you have to give them your social and drivers license how would you even do this without it being identity theft?