Do yo thing Veeky Forums and /fit/ should be closer? Hence they both aim to the same objective , looking good.
Do yo thing Veeky Forums and /fit/ should be closer? Hence they both aim to the same...
Fucking hell, man
That fucking image, jesus christ
That the point , the guys that are buff usually dress like autistic kids
so then to answer OP, no. both have to do with aesthetic but thats where the overlap ends
No. Being in good shape is Veeky Forums. Doing everything you can to show off your muscles is anti/fa/.
Every fitfag I know exclusively wears ripped skinny jeans, tight fitting longsleeves, deep V necks or polos.
I think both forums would gain something un the exchange
But what if you dressed like Veeky Forums and has a /fit/ body?
I mean , evry one that i see that is obsessed with fashion look like auschwitz survivors, and every guy on fit dreses like you said
/fit/fags inevitable end up wearing stuff described in even if they try to look what they think is fashionable.
there is a difference between being fit and having a /fit/ body, the latter is horrible and you'll look like Joe Rogan
Give me an example of the first
You're missing on objective. It's not looking good but feeling good.
Don thing. Veeky Forums , /fit/ is close already whence a thred analogue you is post often.
I think it's effay to be fit but it's not effay to wear clothes because they expose your body. (Deep V-Necks, extreme tight pants/shirts.)
It also isn't effay to be too muscular, have definition but not excessive bulk. The image in the OP is too far.
"aesthetic" The more I see this word abused by Veeky Forumsgs.. the more I hate it.
Just say "looks", no need for big words Mr. Musk.
The best Veeky Forums+/fit/ body is 10%BF ascended ottermode.
t. 10 years of /fit/ and 3 years of Veeky Forums
There's a difference between aesthetics and looks.
Like the relation betweens ethics and actions.