>more comfortable than Stan Smith's >Converse Definitely no. >Cortez Meh, Cortez is basically an OT Mexico 66 with a snubbier toe box. Should be fine but you'll look like a hispanic gang banger if you wear them with shorts. Plus they got a thin sole so you'll be feeling the ground soon within a few months of constant wear. What's wrong with Stan Smith's? >inb4 everyone owns a pair
Michael James
I gained 20kg so my knees and feet hurt if the shoes aren't comfy enough.
I was looking at the Stan Smith Boost but it's kind of out of budget since it's $120 used and $165 through resellers (canadian dollar)
The Converse shoes I mentioned have either Nike Zoom or Nike Lunarlon in them.
Michael Flores
Lose weight fatso
Jaxson Wilson
i never gained weight all my life i was a skinny fuck but that changed since i took psychiatric drugs. nothing i can do about it
Christopher Scott
How about something chunky like Reebok or New Balance?
Jordan Bennett
i think both brands are pretty uggo but i'll give them a try in store if they're comfy
what models?
Joseph Foster
PF flyers are a good option if you want to stick to canvas, Kent Wang makes a decent quality leather sneaker.
Andrew Moore
why would i buy these over, say, converse?
Julian Hill
Because its actual canvas rather then a cotton twill. And they have support, PF Flyers were bought by New Balance in the early 2000's so your not gonna get the shitty lack of comfort that Converse has.
Bentley Taylor
Different guy but I've got a Reebok Club C and it's pretty damn comfy
I wore low top vans as beaters when I was in highschool. Yesterday I bought some white huaraches and i've been wearing ferris hi. I don't know about old skool low tops, but I guess it depends on the look you're trying to achieve
How comfortable are the huaraches? They're a bit out of budget but might get one
Jack Howard
Are jack purcells still alright? Mine are pretty trashed and I never managed to pick up the old ones
Kayden Gutierrez
Stomping in my Air Force 1s proudly after I threw out my old SS. Recommend the crossover. But now I'm looking to purchase other shoes that minimal white sneakers so it's safe to say that it's "just a phase" and it's okay to wear loud(er) shoes
yeah too pricy, i have nmds so i have boost already
Isaiah Hill
these are fucking ugly.
Levi Turner
What's wrong with Stan Smiths?
Austin Fisher
They're not comfy enough.
Anthony Phillips
what's thoses
Joseph Evans
stan smiths
Tyler Jones
Aren't they the same shoe?
Camden Green
hijacking bread because I also want a white shoe. For the anons saying get Purcells, should I go for this cream color instead? Or is pure white a better choice?
Air Force 1s, they're super comfortable and pretty timeless. Adidas Superstars are good too but a little less comfortable and kind of played out right now (but timeless anyway)
Christopher Powell
AF1s were super heavy when I tried them out in store.
i tried these in store, they were way too heavy, hard, and bulky. i imagine it gets comfier after actual use but the shoes were too heavy on my feet
Joshua Flores
Holy shit, are you not able to lift your own feet or what?
Daniel Watson
AF1s are actually known to be heavy though.
Dominic Gray
so you can't lift your feet? got it
Jordan Barnes
I don't know the exact weight of AF1s but it for sure is the heaviest shoes I've ever tried on.
Brayden Nelson
Guys I need help here. I'm trying to decide between the Chuck II and the Jack Purcell Pro, whichever one is more comfortable.
The difference is:
Chuck II >Nike Lunarlon insole
Jack Purcell Pro >Dual-density, OrthoLite® sockliner with Nike Zoom airbag in the heel for cushioning and comfort
The Purcell Pro is more expensive, and the only reason I can think of is because it has cushion in the actual heel instead of insole. Would the Purcell Pro be the better choice then?
Nathan Mitchell
Just bought the Converse Jack Purcell Pro Canvas Low Top.
I realized that the "Nike Zoom in the heel" means it's only on the heel and not throughout the insole. Fuck I feel robbed. Why is this more expensive than the Chuck II then?