Were they authentic or was it just some huxters trying to make a quick buck?
Smithsonian Giants
Actually, they were only 6ft 6", people were really small back then.
How tall were they? 5ft 4"?
The two guys? 4ft "3
What about this?
And this.
And these.
These too.
The skeleton is on a raised platform so it adds a few inches of height. Also it's probably about 8 feet tall which isn't anything in-human. The tallest recorded human height was almost 9 feet.
They obviously are just human skeletons and not some mythical creature. People in ancient times used to think elephant skeletons were proof of Cyclopes
>every big thing is nephilim
confirmation bias
This image is fake. Run it through fotoforensics.com
How do you tell what it's trying to show. Only the skeleton appeared.
>People in ancient times used to think elephant skeletons were proof of Cyclopes
source?
This guy. He came up with the idea that the dawrf elephants found in Crete may have been the inspiration for the stories. The nasal cavity was mistaken for an eye, and they thought it had a more humanoid configuration.
*dwarf elephant fossils.
...
Pretty sure it wasn't an elephant
At least not a modern one
So horses are definitive proof that unicorns exist right?
>eternal manlets, not learning since the dawn of pyramids
he's a big guy
Those are ceremonial.
>was a nazi
every time, Veeky Forums
if I pulled that off, would it be extremely painful for you?
>only
that's still tall as fuck and the fact that they found a bunch of guys who could play in NBA in a time when average man looked like Frodo is not comforting at all because it still means they found some big thing that's different from average human
pfft I didn't even see your filename until I made this
No actually the 2 guys are 5'11 and the giant is 6'2
If I take off that jaw, would you die?
I've heard they are 4'11 and the giant is 6'0
This is the most obvious photoshop i have seen in my life
stop this meme
4 U
European visitors to the Americas often remarked on how tall the indigenous men were. Great Plains Indians were thought to be the tallest people in the world during the 19th century. Unfortunately a lot of them starved to death after being put on reservations, meaning that the people who required fewer calories to survive (the manlets) are the ones we're left with today.
Not an argument :^)
I think that's just cause they had a better diet than the Europeans who would be eating mostly bread
Eurasians lost their height due to agriculture restricting their diets.
a lot of those skeleton finds were incomplete and just based off of leg or arm bones
If you've ever seen a bear's skeleton you can see how pieces of it could be mistaken for human.
Then there's this kook.
>Veeky Forums vs Veeky Forums.jpg
There's lots of reports of very tall Indian tribes in the Americas even during the 19th century. The Karankawa people were described as being between 6 and 7 ft tall, and there were Indians from other tribes who attained those heights.
the truth is out there
is this from Morocco?
How can whites even compete?
I dont get this meme. its like a two inch difference.
They had giants during WW2 as well. Just look at the evidence!
andywhiteanthropology.com
neat skeptic's site
>my four-inch dick is just as good!
google "king of manlets" and check out the images
poor little white boy: the beginning