Are Sorbs just meme slavs?

Are Sorbs just meme slavs?

>meme slavs

What do you mean by this?

Does anyone even speak Sorbian or is it a dead language?

Is their borders about as meaningful as those of Sapmi or do they actually make up a majority anywhere in most of it?

Some thousands. Lower Sorbian is in much worse position than the Upper Sorbian, but there are still some kids who speak it. So it's still not moribund. Yet.

The map is bogus as of today. It's approximately accurate for Sorbian language area approximately 100 years ago. Nowadays Sorbs are minority everywhere, save for some clusters of villages scattered here and there. You definitely won't hear Sorbian spoken casually on the streets of Cottbus or Bautzen.

Sorbs are eastern germanics

>Sorbs are eastern germanics

Lol, no. Linguistically they are Slavs, genetically they are almost identical to Poles.

>genetically they are almost identical to Poles.

That's exactly what i wrote above numbnuts. Poles are eastern germanic too.

They're Germanized Slavs

Bilingual signs are still a necessitiy in some villages.

I wonder if they could have become a second luxenburg if they would have achieved independence earlier.

>this is what Poles actually believe

Actually, no one in Poland believes that. Poles never considered themselves Germanics.

In reality this is meme in which some German nationalists believe.

German nationalists think everyone is Germanic.

>They're slavicized germanics

Fixed that for you, Oleg

>slavicized germanics

You seem upset.

east germans are germanized slavs, is that what you meant?

If anything the Prussians would've been Slavicized Germans.

>Prussians
>Slavicized Germans
>there ever being a thing such as slavicized germans

Is this bait?

That's literally what modern-day silesians are.

There are no "slavs". The "slavic" pantheon is actually germanic (see svetovit, who was a rugian eastern germanic god for example)

Nope, for the most part as I know ancient Slavic gods date back hundreds and hundreds of years and have their origins in indoeuropean societies. It was the Germanics who probably got influenced by IE gods, and even the germanic languages were influenced by IE culture not the other way around, so in other words Aryans around 4000 years ago brought Germanics in modern day denmark copper and bronze and also their gods, etc only to have scandinavian/finno ugric vikings sail down to eastern europe some time later and share their gods which are exactly the same as Slavic pagan gods but only with different names. And saying there are no Slavs in retarded. Slavs had part of their ancestors literally culturally enrich other culture types in Europe.

Not before they get their asses handed to them.
Germans never change.
>you filthy subhuman scum, prepare to be exterminated/enslaved
>oh noes they were germanics all along
Fuck off.
Prussians were mix of germanized old Prussians(Balts) and germanized Lithuanians, germanized(and not) Polish colonist from Mazovia, and German and even some Dutch colonist.
Actually there are some. Especially in Russia but even in other Slav countries as germany was overpopulated shithole from people run to better countries most of the time.
Silesians are rather strange mix of partially(not so much) germanized Slavs who lived in zone between Bohemia and Poland. They can't kinda decide who they are.
Solid part of East germans and Austrians are germanized Slavs.

The whole idea that east of Elbe were germanics and then they move all and leave nobody behind so Slavs appear from nowhere and take empty lands is retarded.
If so east of Elba there were always Slavs. Germanics move from Scandinavia to South and they use rivers to migrate south. They influence their slavic neighbours. It take them some time but they didn't settle for long. And when presure from local slavs was too great they move south again.
It wasn't like in Roman Empire(who after fall of central authority, economic crisis and civil wars) lack ability to thrown them out. Unlike slavs who still was tribal and could mobilize every man able to fight.

>The whole idea that (...) Slavs appear from nowhere and take empty lands is retarded.

I agree. Which just further proves that "slavs" do not exist.

Pan-slavist chauvinist mysticism postulates that somehow slavs popped into existence from out of nowhere.

Nevermind the fact that nobody had ever heard of such a tribe in the entire history of europe leading up to that point.

This whole misconception of a "slavic people" didn't really gain traction up until the mid-19th century anyways.

Back then, the czars of russia had a vested interest in spreading such legends and fantasy tales of an "ancient slavic people" to bolster their territorial ambitions against the habsburgs/austro-hungary.

But it had nothing to do with reality. Just as it has nothing to do with reality right now. The vastly different peoples who were at one point or another in time under byzantine's thumb all happen to speak glagolithic church slavonic which is a completely fabricated pidgin invented by some greek monk named cyrill, but this does not "prove" in any way that the pan-slavist delusions about history are somehow correct.

Regardless of this, pan-slavism has caused two world wars already and will likely cause a third one too if one is to take a look at the pan-slavist soviet LARPing which Jewtin is pulling off right now.

A German policy of planned extermination of Eastern people groups is merely a legend. The so-called 'General Plan East' penned by the Baltic German physician Dr. Hans Ehlich was the product of a single individual and was never taken seriously within the German leadership.

German economic aid for the occupied eastern territories amounted to over 3 billion reichsmarks in the years 1941 to 1943, accounted for 1% of the German GDP in those years. It is assumed that the German Empire in the occupied Eastern Territories economically invested much more into it as it has brought out in terms of resources and labour. In the short time available, the enormous economic problems hardly were manageable. As the situation began to improve in 1943, the Wehrmacht because of the military situation had to leave these territories.
Without these constructive occupation policy approaches, it would be indeed not even conceivable that around one million Ukrainians, Russians, Cossacks, Latvians, Estonians and Caucasians on the German side had voluntarily struggled.

Later, the Russian Liberation Army (ROA) were founded under General Wlassow and the Ukrainian Liberation Army. The war in the East was also a civil war against the Bolshevist ideology.

This unusual degree of collaboration and cooperation sustainable contradicts the thesis, the German occupation policy in the Soviet Union have consisted only of murder and manslaughter. Indeed, there was no occupation policy, rather quite different groups of opinion on the question of the treatment of the East were present among German leaders. The line of cooperation with the Eastern peoples, which was favoured by the Wehrmacht and later Waffen-SS, prevailed in the course of the war more and more.

>German economic aid for the occupied eastern territories amounted to over 3 billion reichsmarks in the years 1941 to 1943
German economic aid on eastern territories went to German settlers and minorities around them you dumb twat.

>they're not real, i swear
>nevermind the biggest language group in europe

>this is what /pol/tards actually believe

Actually /pol/ is full of
>slavs
>white
Choose one.
Dunno from what mental institute this guy break but not from /pol/.
Probably some ameritard pure aryan with 1/32 german blood and 1/64 slav blood trying to justify his bastard existence.

>They actually think Poles and other Slavs are Germanic

This is what some pan-Germanists believe. Nobody in Poland believes that.

>Poles are eastern germanic

we are Slavs you dumb fuck

Slavs are a meme.