Which is more impressive?
Which is more impressive?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Neither. Both are short lived cancers.
mongols tbqh with you ladfam
Both are pretty unimpressive when you look at the people conquered, but I'll go with the Mongols since the technological difference between them and their enemies was lesser
Mongols, the British's main "adversaries" are the Indians, the rest of the space is occupied by empty land and people who have little to no civilization.
Mongols meanwhile defeated the Arab empires, the Chinese empires, the Eastern europeans, and the central Asia.
The Arabs and the Chinese were the most advanced civilization of the time period. Meanwhile Europe was still a fractured medieval states.
What this guy said.
The Brits were fighting with advanced weaponry (machine guns, cannons, rifles) against civilizations armed mostly with Spears and arrows. The only technologically somewhat advanced people they fought were the Indians, who had cannons,guns and horses.
Meanwhile the mongols fought against numerically and technologically superior foes (i.e. the Chinese) armed only with horses and archers
>Mongol
>Empire
In terms of their creation, the Mongol's. In terms of effect on world history, the British.
The British Empire, since the world speaks english now.
That's because the US became a superpower (after they left the shitty empire)
At the peak of the British Empire, French was still the international language
I used to believe this too- the British Empire seems unimpressive when you look at the peoples conquered, but only because that isn't a good measure of how great it was. Britain had near-absolute naval supremacy, important trade monopolies and pioneered advancements in science and engineering.
Britain's technological advantage makes the victories themselves less remarkable, but the fact that Britain was able to accomplish such advancements is surely impressive in itself.
If we look at the scientific achievements of Empires as an indication for their greatness, surely the German Empire would outweigh the British, since the Germans were the first nation to pioneer organic chemistry, quantum physics and modern warfare. Heck had it not been for Fritz Haber (chemist who invented a method to synthesize ammonia) most of us wouldn't be here today, due to synthesized Ammonia being a vital component for the functioning of modern day agriculture and food production.
The fucking Qing Dynasty man
Everyone fucked over them
Militarily the Mongol conquests were possibly a more impressive feat. On all other fronts probably the British.
I think it's a good parameter (along with cultural impacts etc, also why I think the Roman Empire was the greatest in history), so perhaps so. But I definitely don't believe the Mongols came anywhere close.
>WE WUZ
Lol no, Germany is a distant third or fourth after Britain, the USA, and France.
Well the Qing wuz decadant n shitz yo
Corruption went rampant due to Opium epidemic across all levels of state
The Mongols introduced many innovations, such as the first pony express, as well as being great supporters of trade and bringers of peace (after the conquests, obviously) to their vast empires.
Technically the Romans didn't invent that much. Most of Roman technology and science was just a plagiarization/continuation of Greek science and technology. The only technologies which were unically Roman were aqueducts and aeolipiles (a form of primitive steam engine)
Bitch please, France didn't invent shit.
>aeolipiles
Hero of Alexandria.
Au contraire, there was a time when they matched Britain for scientific progressiveness. It was only in their failure to transition to a modern economy that France faltered, and then there was all that nonsense about conquering the world and France's potential ended up spunked into the time-encrusted sock of history.
The mongols controlled anatolia..?
Why did you pick a map of the British Empire that excluded the American colonies?
These threads are always filled with heritage jerking
nobody cares about history they just want their countries they like to look good, and countries they don't like, to look bad
You just explained Veeky Forums
The Empire never had such holdings, that was the Kingdom of England and, after 1707, the Kingdom of Great Britain. Britain wasn't an Empire until Victoria was crowned Empress of India.
>owns the ocean
>gets absolutely demolished on land by askari
Except, you know, cars, airplanes, vaccination, helicopters, air forces...
>implying
What are Lavoisier, Pasteur, Pascal, Lumières brothers, Braille, Ampère, Apper etc
ETERNAL ANGLO
RULED OVER SOME FUCKING NIGGERS
YOUR EMPIRE WAS A FUCKING JOKE
LOLOLOLOLOLOLO
>still butthurt about how hard we fucked you
Top kek m8.
>10598
>
>Bitch please, France didn't invent shit.
excecept maybe fucking cars people brownies bears medusa georgian architecture radiohead....
KEK. FUCKING ETERNAL ANGLO BT THE FUCKING O'D.
Britain is literally the creator of the modern world, responsible for the industrial revolution, modern politics, the language you're reading this in, and did the vast majority of the worlds most important inventions.
>Cars
Invented by Karl Benz (German)
>Airplanes
Invented by the Wright brothers (American
>Vaccination
I'll give you that one
>Helicopters
Overrated invention, with basically same function as a plane.
>Air forces
Just gather a bunch of aeronautic vessels and supply them with machine guns and you've got yourself a air force.
There were no Arab empires by the point of the Mongols invading from the Steppes and Central Asia into Western Asia and the Near East. The Persians were under the yolk of the Khwarmaian dynasty, a Turkic empire. The Abbassids were falling apart at the seams before then because of the Iranian Intermezzo period fractured their connections to the Silk Road and were reasserting themselves, Egypt had broken away iirc, and the Turks were overrunning shit already.
I consider the Mongols more impressive. They still have the largest continuous land based empire in history. Only other empire besides the British Empire to compare is the Achaemenid Empire.
The Mongols. The Brits were pretty shit at fighting anyone on the continent (see the Crimean War) because they geared their entire army to a colonial and garrisoning force. The only reason they didn't get their shit pushed in was because of their trade and navy. Just think, if the Doggerland was still there how easily Britain would be raped countless times
>Cars
>Invented by Karl Benz
Factually false
The first one was invented by Cugnot
en.wikipedia.org
Benz simply produced it en masse
>Airplanes
>Invented by the Wright brothers (American
Wrong, but is wrong too
Planes were invented by a Brazilian guy
>Helicopters
>Overrated invention, with basically same function as a plane.
Helicopters have a huge role in modern warfare
A role that airplanes can't have
>Air forces
>Just gather a bunch of aeronautic vessels and supply them with machine guns and you've got yourself a air force.
Yet the French thought of it first
>The Brits were pretty shit at fighting anyone on the continent
Tell that to Old Boney. Or the French at any point during the middle ages, really. Britain punched well above it's weight even before colonialism.
>Flintlock
>Minié ball
>Smokeless powder
>First modern tank
>First mass-issued semi-automatic rifle
>Tell that to Old Boney
Is that some kind of troll?
Britain was pathetic during the Napoleonic Wars
It took them 6 fucking years to take back Spain from a secondary French army not even lead by Napoleon
If it wasnt for the Russians, Europe would still be French
>Or the French at any point during the middle ages
They spent their time humiliating the English during that period
Pic related
For a country with 1/5th the population and wealth of France, they did pretty well.
>Tell that to Old Boney
Takes you 4 years and millions of men to beat 1 empire and 2 sick men? Wow so powerful!
>Or the French at any point during the middle ages
You mean how it took you 100 years to take France when Germany did it in a few months? And how you ultimate undoing was a teenage peasent girl from bumfuck nowhere, France.
Eternal Anglo pls
Doesn't matter who does it first, only who does it last. Britain loses every battle except the last one.
France was also the most dominant power in Europe for nearly a thousand years. Give credit where credit is due, massive population, fairly stable, major regional power able to exert itself in multiple wars. Hell even a crumbling France BEFORE Napoleon took charge in the late 18th century was holding off the British, Austrians, etc...
*A country with a massive navy which they never failed to use to monopolize their position as the most powerful seapower in Europe for over 300 years
>wright brothers invented the airplane
REEEE ITS GLOURIOUS BRAZILIAN ACHIEVEMENT
REEEE
jeeze lads stop taking things that have nothing to do with you so seriously
>Takes you
>You mean how it took you
>And how you
>you
Which one of us was alive during any of these wars?
Can we all keep the muh heritage roleplaying on /int/?
I'm not aiming this just at the french fella, but to everyone.
>What is Battle of Agincourt?
A single battle, in a era of multiples wars (as opposed to a battle) won by France over England, as you can see on the pic
A single battle, not a war. The French permanently removed the English from any holdings in Europe after all.
And of course an austist had to sperg out about that, as usual...
Britain didn't build it's navy until after the 100 years war, and Britain managed to achieve naval supremacy against French and Spanish monarchs who devoted the huge treasuries of their realms in a futile attempt to keep LE ANGLO ETERNAL hemmed in.
Bongs btfo
yeah well I beat you in fucking dozens of battles
>ride around on horses killing everyone and taking their stuff
>highly coordinated logistics between brilliant men on multiple continents using advanced technology to create a hugely profitable trade network
rly makes u think
I've never been in a battle, unless you mean CoD in which case nu-uh I have mad skillz innit 360 NO SCOPE
>Britain loses every battle until foreigners win the last one
militarily the Mongols were more impressive but on pretty much everything else the British were superior
>Planes were invented by a Brazilian guy
The Wright brothers' flight was a whole 3 years before Alberto Santos Dumont made his. Dumont's only major achievement with his plane was that it was the first one that didn't need a catapult to take off.
>use clever horse tactics to conquer equally advanced people
>go around the globe to machinegun spear-yielding niggers and take their wasteland
Hey, hey, be fair.
>initially go around the globe to musket and cannonball natives already decimated by European diseases
>brits will always be eternally assblasted that we destroyed their shitty empire by showing the world that they cant even hold onto a small island right beside them
>even after trying for hundreds of years and multiple genocides
>they are left dealing with the fake shithole they created on this island forever too, eternally embrassing them in the eyes of civilised nations
Mongols, especially for conquering China. Had it not been for untimely death of Ogedei this wouldn't even be a disputed topic
fuck off lad this is a big boy country thread
and soon Northern Ireland will return to true Ireland now that Brexit has happened
>multiple genocides
>implying bogtrotters are human
Top craic you petrol-sniffing potatonigger. Enjoy your niggers and EU aids.
don't forget:
London wants independence.
Wales wants independence.
Scotland wants independence.
Cornwall wants independence.
Scarborough wants independence.
Gibraltar wants independence.
Britbongs have fucking destroyed themselves.
>uk talking about niggers
Britain was already a major naval power in the 1600s, the loss of the Spanish Armada signaled the rise of the British as the preeminent naval power in Europe for the next 200 something years. Regardless of this, they have NEVER failed to use it to its maximum potential to ensure other European powers (Spain, France, Germany, Italian city-states, etc...) would ever rival them.
we're about 86% white
Ireland is 8% white
So they achieved hegemony and then maintained it for centuries? Sounds pretty successful to me.
no it means theyt LE ERTENAL ANGLO go home NIGE
Yeah you sure look it
When the Romans were cucking you, did they bring monkeys to England and make your ancestors fuck them?
No, it means that you're drastically underplaying the whole "WE WAZ A SMALLER COUNTRY N SHIT" angle because they always have used their navy to enforce their socioeconomic power as a merchantile based country.
Having a small population is no handicap when you can starve out your enemies trade and commerce or wealth over the sea lanes.
c'mon paddy, you're SCIENTIFICALLY more ape-like
You know, as an American, its always amusing to see how much hostility there is between the Irish and English. Even in the New World, the Irish carried that shit over during the Civil War.
>1800s propaganda
>science
This is clearly satire
You seem to imply that just because Britain was small and poor, it follows that it was easy for them to maintain an "unfair" dominance at sea. Britain contested control of the seas with the Dutch, the Spanish and the French and eventually even the Germans, and won every time. It has a record of dominance at sea comparable with the Ottoman dominance at land, a nigh unheard of hegemony over the most fractious and economically powerful region in the world. By contrast teh French leveraged the most bountiful and prosperous part of Western Europe to be the "also ran" of world Empires and now merely part of new German Reich in the making. That's if the Arabs don;t turn it into an Islamic Republic first.
Eugenics was a big thing in the late 1800s and early 1900s in the West. It wasn't satirical at all.
I never said Britain was poor. Nor did I say anything about fairness at all here. Please read my post.
Maybe you have autism and cant understand humor
Everyone here has autism.
Poe's Corollary strikes again.
The "anglo-teutonic" person looks like a classical greek statue, not some saxon pig fucker
it's scientific you dumb paddy
Lettow-Vorbeck was pretty much the best guerilla general ever
>Lol no, Germany is a distant third or fourth after Britain, the USA, and France.
The U.S. was mostly an irrelevant back-woods nation until the Spanish-American War of 1898 and wasn't a major player until after WWI.
USA was literally the (modern) China of the late 19th century. Sure it wasnt in the stupid overseas games Europeans were playing initially, and neither was it militarily powerful compared to other European Powers (mcfucking Volunteer Militias for an army) but it was a manufacturing giant in the western world.
50% of Americans were still farmers in 1920.
Just like Modern China!
>SA was literally the (modern) China of the late 19th century
This is true. We literally did a complete 180 on all of our founding beliefs for the sake of money and good times. Americans went from fighting imperialistic anglos to murdering anti-imperialist Filipinos, Caribbean peoples, Latinos, Chinese, Japanese, etc.
Him vs Mao who wins
Mao wasn't a guerilla general, he was a politician.
You're looking at Zhu De and Peng Dehuai as the originators of the CCP's "People's War"
most of the dead are disease not battle the germans were successful by avoiding action, not because they won standup fights
I wonder if 800 years from now we'll remember Hitler like this. Only focusing on the positives like technology and not the negatives.
>Both are pretty unimpressive when you look at the people conquered
The Mongols went across some of the most powerful empires, kingdoms, and states in their time.