ATHEISTS AND AGNOSTICS BTFO
HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER?
ATHEISTS AND AGNOSTICS BTFO
Andrew Bennett
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Brayden Collins
>what is testability
Julian Fisher
Oh so now suddenly religious people value logic, lel.
Wyatt Barnes
>suddenly religious people value logic
>mfw
Ian Howard
>inb4 someone posts that fucking ice/liquid/gas image again
Brandon Torres
what am i looking at here?
Evan Barnes
It's the formula that proves Jesus literally rose from the dead, and that he's truly present in the Eucharist
Ryder Wilson
Thomas Ross
An obsolete version of the ontological argument.
Zachary Ross
you will never be able to prove wheter god exists or not.
prove me wrong
Julian Perez
oh come on. the ontological argument is by far the worst "proof" for God
Matthew Flores
If God exists then there must be evidence for it.
There is no evidence that god exists.
Therefore god does not exist.
:^)
Brayden Martinez
meant for
Logan Cook
how come you are that sure that we are capable to perceieve those proofs? we are talking about a galactic deity capable of everything, if he wants to hide himself he can. also it's impossible for us to understand how he "thinks".
Xavier Allen
In that case the entire question is ultimately irrelevant, there could be any number of unknowable deities hiding out somewhere that have no real contact with us. Better to waste your time with physical masturbation then the intellectual variety.
Grayson Bell
too late, already disproved, u mad, no use complaining now
Gabriel Brown
>there could be any number of unknowable deities hiding out somewhere that have no real contact with us
that's right.
>Better to waste your time with physical masturbation then the intellectual variety.
why not both?
Brayden Roberts
I can almost understand this, but what do the squares and the diamonds mean?
Zachary Smith
so why not assume that he doesn't? It seems the most logical thing to do given that if He is as you say then there can be no sound evidence either for or against him
Kevin Rogers
One of science's biggest weaknesses is that is must wait for the proof to be found, and in this case, a supposed living thing out of our reach, until it reveals itself.
Oliver Hill
You're right, they should let all sorts of quacks in on faith cuz u cant know nuffin.
Carter Parker
Axiom: God exists.
QED
Charles Robinson
this is the level of maturity that can be expected from atheists
Caleb Gutierrez
spook
Ryan Smith
Axiom: Axioms do not exist.
Angel Watson
>why not both?
I too like to get philosophical while cranking my shaft.
Nicholas Gutierrez
embarrassing post
Colton Wilson
aaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-
Landon Watson
shitposting in a shitpost thread
Leo Reed
>en.m.wikipedia.org
>Most criticism of Gödel's proof is aimed at its axioms: As with any proof in any logical system, if the axioms the proof depends on are doubted, then the conclusions can be doubted. This is particularly applicable to Gödel's proof, because it rests on five axioms that are all questionable. The proof does not say that the conclusion has to be correct, but rather that if you accept the axioms, then the conclusion is correct.
Jaxson King
Welp you got me, zeus is real, time to pack our bags everybody.
Michael Mitchell
this only works if you accept Godels his axioms. i don't.