>which one is more fun to drive?
I drove both, I'm currently waiting for Subaru to build my BRZ, the MX5 failed to impress in any way (the 1.5 is the better engine having driven it and the 2L, much more perky but the BRZ felt like a better all round package)
It was the standard version. I couldn't quite get the right seating position either. And I'm almost a manlet.
I was very positively surprised, I have an s2000 as a summer car, but the gt-86 seemed more fun on the small twisty roads, though that might have been having traction control which I don't have in the honda
My expectations definetly had a lot to do with it. There was just a lot of things, the suspension, the seation position, the engine, the transmission. Nothing seemed 100% in tune. everything was 70% which made everything seem off.
i really, REALLY love the concept of a sort of retractable targa top with a fastback side profile, it's just neat, and is barely heavier than the soft top miats
if i wasn't dead set on a used abarth 124 i'd def consider an RF
I dunno man looks kinda weird with the top down
>BRZ has only 3 more torque despite 45 more hp
What a fucking joke
I DD a BRZ, the only problem is having more than one or two passengers. But other than its fine.
>The Miata has three less torques and 45 fewer horses despite having the same sized engine.
Now that's a joke.
>cares about torque
Doesn't understand gears.
it makes the same torque and keeps it at a higher rpm than the mazda, which allows it to make more power.