Throughout history since the 20th century, women have constantly made their clothes more and more revealing. The dresses were long, then made shorter and shorter, and now we have what we have today.
Was it the same with men? Did they ever bitch about clothes? How did men's clothing evolve when in comparison to women's?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
My grandfather use to wear suits to the beach.
I'm honestly pissed I can't wear a skirt without looking like a faggot or a tranny but women can dress like men and nobody gives a shit.
I totally agree. I would be wearing leggings and skirts all the damn time. I'm not a tranny but it just feels good.
I am pretty gay though.
>Was it the same with men? Did they ever bitch about clothes?
Hats
Waistcoats
Canes
Grooming your mandatory moustache/beard/sideburns
Cufflinks
Ties are still mandatory in some places
I have a massive fucking dick and it just feels better in a skirt than to choke it in pants.
also pocket watches, cigars/pipes and other retarded stuff you had to wear on yourself
I agree with you mate, can't bring this shit up in normal conversation though.
this is the future, men just need a little more convincing that's all
>Throughout history
>since the 20th century
So, ignoring the other 6,000 years?
Damn, that dancing is impressive but... God this is still so cringy.
Can't say I have any terrible need to wear a skirt, but I am a bit jealous for women for the diverse hairstyles that are nonetheless considered to be within the norm for them.
Tbh that's what saddens me about Australia, we have such an annoying climate yet we barely have our own fashion to match, all the stores stock american shit that doesn't suit besides thongs and singlets.
>Throughout history since the 20th century
>since the 20th century
>the last 16 years
>throughout history
Women are not responsible for liking BBCs.
Imagine that you are hungry and that a guy offers you free food. Then you are logical when you take the food. Now imagine that dozens of guys offer you free food, at each moment of your life.
It just turns out that BBC offer better food than SWC. And women are right to take what pleases them the most.
20th century is 1900-2000 retard
go cuckpost on /pol/ you small willied negroid
What?
Men used to cover up as well.
No showing of bare arms and legs out in public.
The mini-skirt was most popular in the 50s and 60s, not today. So even the premise of your question is wrong.
But sure, the Victorian era was especially prudish, and that's when the 20th century began.
As for men, their fashion has changed much less during the same period, but that's the exception, not the rule. Men's fashion changed A LOT between 1800-1900, for instance,
Right so SINCE the 20th century is since 2000.
No?
Since the 20th century=since 1900
I wish it was more customary, even socially expected to dress nicer. Then my problem would be getting a tailored suit.
>"american cut" is just fat guy clothes
>Move to Scotland
>Wear kilt 24/7
>Play the bagpipes cause why the fuck not
>????
>profit
>But sure, the Victorian era was especially prudish
And yet at the same time I could come home to my 12 year old wife every night
Uhh dude? You are aware that the woman in this picture is probably just demonstrating how to resuscitate someone by chest compression, right?
The humorous thing is that most black guys have average/small sized cocks just like every other male. The only black cocks you see are in porn, keep that in mind.
>good for wide middles
JUST
[citation needed]
You ESL?
Women will step out of line and away from traditional values if you let them. What we have today is a failure of men to keep women in their traditional roles and require that they have some degree of respect for themselves. This has led to the breakdown of the nuclear family structure which will inevitably lead to the downfall of our society as a whole.
...
>Doesn't know what the xxth century means
>posts on Veeky Forums
maximum kek
>the downfall of our society as a whole
A cleansing fire makes for fertile ground. It's all part of the 'plan'
Evola, please.
Can someone actually be this dumb?
OP pls, you're not fooling anyone.
This guy can't be real
There's legitimately a ton of male hairstyles you can go with though. Chunky sloppy men might think you're a try hard fag but there are lots of options from history.
?
re: samefagging damage control for your idiotic topic
What? I just joined this thread, dumbass
Were men just sweaty and stinky all the time through the 1800s and early 1900s?
>airplane mode on
>airplane mode off
you showed me!
I've wondered this too. How the fuck do you wear that shit, especially in the south. I live in Texas and I can't even wear jeans from like May-November
lol
>trying this hard to prove a point on the Internet
I'll humor you with two pictures
...
>Throughout history since the 20th century, women have constantly made their clothes more and more revealing. The dresses were long, then made shorter and shorter, and now we have what we have today.
Yeah nope
...
Savages don't count
...
>First civilization on the americas, inventor of the only native american form of script
>Savages
Pick one
Also let's look at bronze age europe then.
>Throughout history since the 20th century
>Throughout history
>Since the 20th century
Is this a troll thread? Take it to Veeky Forums if you are going to discuss modern fashion
...
>my argument stands so long as I refute all counter-evidnece
Crete isn't Europe. Medshits are savages
>Horned helmets
>Veeky Forums is for events more than 25 years ago
>1991 and earlier
Literally 91% of the 20th century is appropriate for Veeky Forums.
>native american form of script
I don't think it constituted script. I've heard that they were interpreted rather than read.
Except they totally were a thing amongst sardinians
By medshits you mean mediterranean peoples? I'm confused, you're calling the Greeks and romans, the builders of modern civilization savages?
>it's a "the world began with Victorian England" thread
en.wikipedia.org
It was interpreted and worked in a similar way to japanese writing. Plus they had propper documents, only for the spaniards to burn them all as witchcraft that is.
The problem is you aren't talking about events, you are talking about fashion. Something that has been around a lot longer, and has changed in a not so linear way, unlike what OP is trying to say.
I don't know if OP had a point he wanted to make, but this thread is shit.
>Builders of Modern civilization
>Smartphones
Horned helmets were a wall mount in some cultures, but weren't used in battle.
>Horned helmets were a wall mount in some cultures, but weren't used in battle.
Which is why it's used on a ceremmonial context here, holy fuck are you dense.
>Smartphones
Now you're just shitposting at this moment, you and all here know that western civilization is based upon Greek Philosophy and Achievements and Roman Law. It's not a matter up to debate.
OP is talking about fashion in the 20th century, which has indeed changed in a pretty linear way (at least for women). The question OP is asking, is was this the same for men? How did men's clothing evolve in comparison to women.
This is all very clearly pointed out in the OP. The fact that fashion in the whole of history is not changing in a linear way, has nothing to do with the thread. Such observations are outside the scope of the thread, as posed by OP.
There is no "ceremonial context" in the image he is holding a sword. The image implies this is what soldiers used.
Modern civilization is based on the works of the Muslims, which is influenced by the works of the Greeks, which were civilized by Semites, which started it all. So we have smartphones today because of Semites. Logic not even once. Greeks are incapable of reaching today's tech that's what matters.
well...
>And to such a habit have they brought themselves, that even in the coldest parts they wear no clothing whatever except skins, by reason of the scantiness of which, a great portion of their body is bare, and besides they bathe in open rivers.
Caesar on Germans
Seersucker or linen.
The women are doing it to themselves.
Ever since open sexuality in females became socially acceptable, women began dressing in more revealing clothing in order to attract men that they could now freely have sex with.
Other women realized the effect and started dressing the same way. Then another, even more revealing clothing style popularized for the same reason, and it continues.
In short, it's a progressively intensifying battle for women to be more attractive than other women. As long as most males cater to their biological instincts and choose to have sex with the most sexually provocative females, they will continue to act in this way.
If females were attracted to men mostly based on physical prowess as opposed to financial and social status, we would see this trend accelerate in men the same way it has in women.
>he could have modern smartphones without the Indian numeral system.
Also old indians used to wear revealing clothes.
Yes actually, it got especially bad during indoor house parties judging from anecdotes from the time.
>WE WUZ AZTECS AND SHEET
Someone explain what the black dude is doing here?
>Throughout history since the 20th century
Its paint you mongoloid
>Throughout history since the 20th century, women have constantly made their clothes more and more revealing.
Aren't most fashion designers men? Also, isn't it more likely that the fashion industry, continuously looking for cheaper labor and raw materials, simply pushed skimpier outfits as a way to maximize profit? If you can convince someone to buy a skirt 1/8 the length of the average but for four times the price, that's a handy profit. It's not as if all clothes today are skimpy slips of nothing. Your OP pic isn't something you'd find normally walking a city street.
It seems to me that the fashion industry just capitalized on their media power to open up a hundred niche markets for women who have been targeted for decades by marketing tying their relatively newfound financial and social independence with materialism.
Men, already financially and socially independent, were not as simple to court with prolific and varied fashions, and instead marketing became all about class and status. Rather than single out the male consumer as unique, his clothes and accessories were meant to identify him with his peers, real or imagined. In short, women's fashion was meant to compete with their peers while men's fashion was meant to identify with a peer group.
They all look the same to me.
The amount of tinfoil hat in this post is astounding.
Bullshit.
None of that has anything to do with conspiracy at all. It's straightforward corporate policy and marketing aims. It's not even all that different from earlier European fashion trends where upper class women dressed to stand out individually while the men dressed to display their social rank.
Those are fake anyways. Porn companies use prosthetics
>what is amateur porn
Exactly they are depicted as wearing them while fighting in ancient Egyptian ruins
An attempt by you to derail this thread.
In reality blacks are more likely to buy porn so porn companies pander to them
>implying most porn labeled as amateur isn't produced by porn companies
Oh I don't know.
It's not like there was a trade network where Central Americans, Amazonians, and others could immigrate.
It's not like literally every powerful tribe in Mesoamerica except the Maya migrated from the south.
Speaking of which: if the Aztecs and Purepecha were so freakishly powerful, imagine what kind of other Americans they must have escaped.
You overestimate the bottom line.
I bet he thinks that all those casting couch videos are actually just random girls going to job interviews too.
Wow, that was probably needlessly uncomfortable. What an idiot
>what are all those homemade amateurs on xvideos with black dudes
>he actually thinks that they're homemade
Hey the more aesthetic the better
Why does homosexuality constitute a different culture? Why aren't there more homosexuals that just act like normal men?
>implying small dicked negroes will upload sex videos
It's rare enough to find tiny white dicks.
>Why aren't there more homosexuals that just act like normal men?
Because homosexuals are no longer normal men.
The same reason fedoras can't just not care and have to evangelize their superior nothingness.
When faced with systemic prejudice, widespread bigotry, and violence, it makes sense to band together out of mutual self-interest. From there it's only natural subculture would begin to form.
But look at homosexuality in the Greeks, from what I've read they all acted like "masculine" men although homosexual
As someone who is a "faggot" and thus can wear skirts, let me just say they are great. Not the short ones though in my opinion.