Is he overrated ?

Is he overrated ?

Nah he was pretty cool, a modern alexander in that he conquered a bunch of shit but it didnt last very long

No, but his nephew is underrated.

>tfw we'll never see another great conquerer

Autistic Good

what are some good beginnner books about Napoleon?

Underrated if anything. You'll hear some pretty idiotic things about him from those without knowledge of him. A real "philosopher king".

What is he doing with that little girl?

He seems to be reading a book while she sleeps

He is greater than Alexander. Alexander had no administrative skills and had his army handed to him. Alexander was a tactical mastermind but that's about it.

Napoleon started from nothing from a newly conquered territory, his laws and ideals influenced the whole world. He is a rags to riches story.

He's literally greatest European ever.

That is what you think.

I don't think it's a girl.

This

underrated
he changed Europe

That isn't Isaac Newton.

>J'ai versé le sang de 4000 anglo-saxons
What did he mean by this?

>Manipulate your way to power
>Wage wars that kill millions of Europeans
>Wreck ancient nation states
>Try to capture the Mediterranean from Britain
>Lose
>Team up with Spain to try to capture the Atlantic from Britain
>Lose again
>Try to invade Russia
>Lose
>"Dude, stop invading countries. You can keep France or w/e"
>"NO, NORMIES GET OUT REEE"
>Loses again, exiled to Elba
>Comes back, tries to retake power
>Wrecked by the UK and Prussia, dies of hypothermia in a tiny island
Wew, what a leader.

BEADY

This, my prof in uni said the most inspiring thing about him is how a no name from bum fuck Corsica could rise up and put all of Europe at his knee, no faggy aristocracy or kings needed.

Pretty inspiring desu

Does your prof also like Genghis Khan? Napoleon was him 2.0.

>French people still chose him again over a fuccboi monarch

Get rekt

Actually that's not a fair comparison. Genghis Khan died in a victorious battle whereas Napoleon died of exposure in the middle of nowhere.

I'd reply seriously, but you posted kekington

By the French people you mean a bunch of bitter soldiers who wanted their empire back?

Those guys picking him again just weakened their country further, and France's history since then has been a string of European defeats leading up to its current situation of near-collapse.

Anyway, French conservatives had been repressed and massacred in the Vendee so they weren't going to start stirring up trouble when his defeat was guaranteed by the massive alliance against the guy.

Lmao get off Veeky Forums Metternich

He was a fucking manlet.

>Wage wars that kill millions of Europeans

And that's were you lost credibility
The Napoleonic Wars were started by Britain in 1803 with the 3rd coalition
Then the 4th coalition war was started by Prussia and the 5th one by Austria
Nappy conquered Europe in self defense against British funded aggressions

Good question
More than that died at Badajoz alone

Eternal Anglo strikes again.

By modern popular consciousness?
He's considered almost Hitler 1.0, so massively underrated.
By the historicallay literate?
He is given his just due, as a flawed but great leader that was too ambitious for his own sake.

As well, we would still probably be using his artillery tactics if indirect artillery hadn't been invented.

Nahh, its just that he had is mostly remembered because of his fuck up against Prussia.

>conquers all relevant europe in 10 years
>Britain had to form 8 (eight) coallitions to finally get rid of him
>literally take third world France and make it a superpower in a couple of years.
>After finally defeating him exile him to island in the middle of nowhere
>He fucking comes back
>exile him even further away
>have to poison him to be sure he never comes back

>You will never conquer half of europe to then sit down in your comfy chair and read with a loli in your lap