VIN CHECK THREAD

Look at the drastic change in miles? What happened? If the engine was replaced wouldn't there be a record showing that?

I just want a mid size truck that doesn't have a dodgy record.

Here's what I am thinking.

The 6 to 63K to 8.5K is a typo. The 63K should be some sort of 6K and it just has an extra digit. That would go in sequence.

That's probably the same issue with the 9.2K to 171K. Probably 17K something with an extra digit.

As for the rest of it, They seem in order. Quite a bit of mileage put on, but I have known a couple guys who put on FAR more than that. And the presence of "not included in rollback calculation" suggests that AutoCheck also viewed these instances as typos and doesn't see any suspicious issues.

Looks like some dipshit shop fucked up and added on the 10ths.

YS3FH47R181146341

SAAB 9-3: The owner mentioned a buyback; I'm not sure what to think of it.

Thank you!

1FTZR15V4YPA27261

If vins are a thing beginning 1981, what about cars before 1981? How are the identified today?

There were still VINs prior to 1981. But there was no standardization. So each manufacturer had its own ways of doing it. Some were shorter, some were longer. Some had only numbers.

Sometimes it was more of a "chassis code", where it was just a sequenced number given to a car based on production.

It was a mess. Standardized VINs are definitely, in my opinion, a positive change in automotive history.

1ftyr10c6ypa84384

California License plate: 5YLA673

2007 Subaru Legacy GT
Thank you!

1GBKG31U861273136