Order of the white feather

I agree in principle but I don't think there's a conspiracy by Obama. For all practical purposes his administration was pretty damn balanced and decent.

it is natural for men like you to crave the validation of their existence and get depressed if they fail to feel relevant, responsible, dutiful.
The best way for a man to cater his need for approval is to serve some woman (and some of her children) through emotional&financial support, which he sees as ''a childish useless submissive woman'' [or whore and he feels betrayed by her]
Men are pleased to contribute to someone else life, to support their family.

Why women are a good way to feel relevant? Because women love to be provided for and each woman will always find a man ready to please her.
[for most men, the best feeling of feeling real is when the girl moans from your cock in her pussy, or for the most impotent, their tongue in the pussy]

THe problem for men is that they are disposable in the eyes of each woman, since all men wish to serve the few women who talk to them.
Men must thus invent several ways to please women, invention and creativity which strengthen their feeling of being worthy, relevant, in touch with reality.
Men are too impotent to find other way to feel real.
Once that the a woman replaces a man by another provider, the man gets very upset and depressed.
THis leads men to think that they are better than women, stronger, smarter and that they must built a life outside women. Some men manage to indeed built an empire, but they will always loose it for some women.
Women give meaning to men and betas, no matter how successful outside women, will always give up everything for some relationship with some woman who claim to fancy them.

user, will i have to teel you about the jews?

Lets start with the midia and gov, who controls them?

Even the neckbeards at /v/ do a better job than you. Why is that every woman has to exaggerate, repeat words sometimes capitalize them the second time and add a lot exclamation marks to falseflag here, and its always something about gender.

Is this bait, or are you really this dumb?

> Private Ernest Atkins was on leave from the Western Front. He was riding a tram when he was presented with a white feather by a girl sitting behind him. He smacked her across the face with his pay book saying: "Certainly I'll take your feather back to the boys at Passchendaele. I'm in civvies because people think my uniform might be lousy, but if I had it on I wouldn't be half as lousy as you."

...

I can't tell if you're /r9k/ or /pol/

What's the difference?

Based

Though I find 'assemblywomen' funny, I don't really understand why you parade around the ancient Athenian equivalent of a /pol/ greentext as evidence.

Especially missing the point that the city is named after THE strong independent woman

>tought it was allowed to beat women back them.
You thought wrong shithead.

because they predicted the futured you fucking idiot!
This affects you, this affect us all. YOUR CHILDREN WILL LIVE IN POVERTY

Emperor augustus saw what was happening to rome what happened when men lost control. The romans lamented that rome controlled the world but women controlled rome.

Augustus desperately tried to stop the sexual deviance of women he tried to preserve the values of the empire to stop their adultery by making it legal to kill a cheating wife. He even banished his own daughter for adultery. He saw women a greater threat to rome than war and he was the only surviving general of a civil war.

Augustus failed and rome fell

>heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/12/27/feminism-responsible-for-the-fall-of-rome/

>purplemotes.net/2014/06/08/men-reluctant-marry/

>telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11562374/Britain-is-experiencing-same-decline-as-Rome-in-100BC.html

>unrv.com/government/julianmarriage.php

>womenintheancientworld.com/augustanreformation.htm

>Speech of the censor Quintus Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus [16] about the law requiring men to marry in order to produce children. According to Livy (Per. 59), in 17 B.C. Augustus read out this speech, which seemed "written for the hour", in the Senate in support of his own legislation encouraging marriage and childbearing (see no. 121).

>"If we could survive without a wife, citizens of Rome, all of us would do without that nuisance; but since nature has so decreed that we cannot manage comfortably with them, nor live in any way without them, [17] we must plan for our lasting preservation rather than for our temporary pleasure.

triggered much?

What does that story have to do with beating women you idiot?

/r9k/ are more reasonable.

nothing, just wanted to make you cry more, asshole.

I was talking to you on /tv/ the other week wasn't I.

>You thought wrong shithead.

What are you, 12 years old? Who hurted you user?

>/r9k/ are more reasonable.

How so?

Never in my life i went to TV, i'm the arch warlock.

Why do you say that?

Oh please
>talks about MUH WAGE GAP in the fucking state of the union speech
>always backs niggers in possible police violence cases, sometimes literally hours after the event with no way of knowing the details

Top kek, your really fucking desperate, aren't you.

>Obama

A pawn of the jews.

Your posting the same shitty jpg's and spouting the same idiotic dogma.

>talking with holes.png

Adhominen will get you nowhere here, cunt, only arguments will, and you got none.

Such arguments user.

Look at the great posts of 'triggered much' and 'cry more'.

I'm blown away by your blindness to your own hypocrisy.

What are you even babbling about you utter cretin?

"It used to be considered ok for men to beat women" is a feminist meme.

lmao

/r9k/ are crying for help, and are just bitter losers, and can be very nice people really.

/pol/ are dogmatic and will hate anything relentlessly if it threatens their delusions.

It is you isn't it?

>just bitter losers

l don't like you.

>delusions

Namely?

>It is you isn't it?

Who?

""his"" definition of "delusion" is not being white guilt faggot who worships the black panthers

Your silly conspiracy theories for one.

>I don't like you
To you too

from /tv/

>white guilt
Nah, I don't like them either.

>Worshps the black panthers
I'm getting bored of Marvel Superheroes actually

>theory

educate yourself

pastebin.com/MSvkCCRy
pastebin.com/Uc1EkvGZ

i never when to /tv/ faggot what are you talking about?

This is a hoax, right? Sounds like historical revisionism if it's true.

You even need to ask? we live in 1984book, scroll up.

Call him a liar, delusioned, /pol/, a biggot, a cuck. They all slide off him like rain.
But say 'its you from /tv/' and look how he recoils, he thinks 'I've been found out'

I couldn't find it, the author's a Guardian 'journalist' though.

user i never been to /tv/ in my life, for fucks sake are you stalker of a tripfag or something?
link me who he is i got curious now

are they reptilians though
do vaccines cause autism
do you vote trump
is the earth flat
who exactly is untermensch? arabs? slavs? asians? females?
did hitler do anything wrong?
is christianity a jewish plot
is democracy wrong? do you want oligarchy, monarchy or something else?
was world war 2 the allies fault

presumably you do not believe in all of these and it is only a coincidence that some loons who do identify with your board

Yes user, there's quite a few crafty kikes in high places. They aren't all organised in some massive nefariousness agenda.

They got there through a mixture of nepotism and genetic talent in those areas. And especially at how loose and arbitrary the conditions are for you to call the Jews.

>who exactly is untermensch? arabs? slavs? asians? females?
they know, albeith /r9k/ specialises on the last one and who whites are

>do vaccines cause autism
yes

>do you vote trump
not aberican

>is christianity a jewish plot
pic

>is democracy wrong?
obviously

>was world war 2 the allies fault
ye, pic incomming

you're a cuck btw

It was weeks ago it'll be 404 by now. It was about that shit new Ghostbusters film.

>They aren't all organised in some massive nefariousness agenda.
they literally control half the world you fucking cancer

>They got there through a mixture of nepotism and genetic talent in those areas.
>implying

> And especially at how loose and arbitrary the conditions are for you to call the Jews.
>implying

found the shill
>inb4notshill
them you're a normalfag, only those fucking animals can't logic. I gave you the evidence, add 2+2 or fuck off to leddit

You must have had a lot of vaccines then, kek.

find me it on the archives

upvoted

Fuck off back to tumblr, cunt?

but what about flat earth and holocaust and what goverment do you want

also what's in area 51

You dropped your fedora.

Ever heard of fallacies user, namely confirmation bias and circular logic?

>Implying
Implying what?

>but what about flat earth
never heard
> and holocaust
pic
>and what goverment do you want
forgot the name, see, the issue is that humans where made to live in tribes not in hives.
my best examples are Robert Owen and canudos

The Brazilian national government wanted a military expedition sent to destroy Canudos in the name of liberalism and progress.[7] In the words of one historian, "The mere existence of autonomous movements not subject to state control was antithetical to the national interest. Canudos stood for such autonomy, and therefore had to be destroyed”. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canudos

>also what's in area 51
eh, ayys maybe? mind control? it doesn't exist?
never researched so idk

Post some images, brother.

I just gave you the proofs of my claims, while you gave none.

Quietly remove yourself.

He's Veeky Forums, with the worst traits of both.

well, greeks also used to fuck little boys, so i would take everything they say with a grain of salt

>Muh proofs
Meaningless, same kind 'proof' that proves 'the patriarchy'

As in not proof at all.

it's like arguing with a woman

>He wouldn't bang this.

see Sorry, but you've lost user.

where is his penis

lmao, not even a shill you're a troll

It didn't developed yet

user, Hitler's describing your argument tactics. This is describing exactly what you are doing.

>& Humanities

Was a mistake.

>He's Veeky Forums,
aktualy i rarely came in here, the other 3 times i got banned quickly, in the beggining when the board was /her/

>with the worst traits of both.
suck as?

>aktualy i rarely came in here
No you're usually on /tv/ aren't you?

The mistake was thinking that any discussion of either can actually survive on an anonymous imageboard, without devolving into a dick waving contest to see who can be edgier.

A male admiral of the British navy, encouraged it to be made to shame men into enlisting.

You going to start bitching about the evil of males now faggot?

If you keep mad about that, maybe.

But where's the proofs of your claim?

>In August 1914, at the start of the First World War, Admiral Charles Fitzgerald founded the Order of the White Feather with support from the prominent author Mrs Humphrey Ward. The organization aimed to shame men into enlisting in the British Army by persuading women to present them with a white feather if they were not wearing a uniform.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather

How do you bitch about something you don't even bother to even read a wiki on?

>How do you bitch about something

see Why are you so mad? Who hurted you, user?

You are so full of shit. What are you even trying to argue?

By his unwillingness to accept he was wrong it seems to be a MRA who spread his cancer here.

Fair warning he'll just spam anti women shit and not discuss things like an adult.

I know, its me who's been arguing with him. That 'see' post was originally directed at me.

>BUHAAAAAA! I DON'T LIKE WHAT U SAYING SO U WRONG! BUAHHHHHHHHHHHH!

>MRA
see You cunts aren't discussing like adults, using adhominen, mocking, and no argument what so ever!
I'm giving arguments and proof, is this not how adults argue? How you cunts propose i argue? by namecalling and not giving counterarguments like you cunts?
Are you fembabbling or are you white knights?

>cancer

Yes, truth is evil, go watch some TV.

What are YOU trying to argue? i'm just dumping some illegal truths.

>I'm giving arguments with proof
Are you really?

Because I don't see any proof.

>namecalling and not giving counterarguments like you cunts?

>BUHAAAAAA! I DON'T LIKE WHAT U SAYING SO U WRONG! BUAHHHHHHHHHHHH!

This one, this is what you are doing.

>Illegal truths
Top kek

Go preach on

>Because I don't see any proof.

Them scroll up and this time READ.
This includes the images.

>This one, this is what you are doing.
What i'm doing NOW, see how nice it is?

>>Illegal truths
Try going outside and claim hitler did nothing wrong, cunt.

>jews belong in /x/
wew lady

Fucking women i swear, worst than fucking children. No self awereness what so fucking ever.doing what i posted in the images step by step, word by word.

I don't understand the image.

...

lel, more like Veeky Forums

Why would you use this image like it proves anything? It a fucking play it was probably meant to be humorous.

I found your /tv/ thread by the way.
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/73030511/

>Then scroll up and read.
I have user, its all bullshit apart from maybe the German government censorship.

Shitty jpgs screencapping /pol/ are not evidence.

>What i'm doing NOW, see how nice it is?
No its what you have been doing the entire thread.

400 million dollars ransom paid to Iran literally last week.

Its saying creepy men are creepy.

>like it proves anything
Exacly what they predicted is happening, idiot.

This proves you don't even need science to understand women, all you need is remove the lies.

>it's meant to be humorous
So?
I laugh at Sweden if that matters.

>I found your /tv/ thread by the way.
>archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/73030511/

Thanks

>I have user, its all bullshit

comfirmed not reading
Try proving that it's bullshit, child, like an adult would do.

>Shitty jpgs screencapping /pol/ are not evidence.
>only 1 of those

>No its what you have been doing the entire thread.

LEL see You have been doing that you roastie whore, i decided to do the same to show you how good it is when someone acts like a woman.

>no, you!

I'm yet to see a single argument from you.

Is it really though user? I don't see any laws about having to pityfuck unattractive women.

This seems to be what communists want to do. Not what has happened or what 'all women' want. This may surprise you, but most women aren't communists, even the ones in powerful positions.