...
Was this the best generation of it?
This generation
FOX BODY
O
X
B
O
D
Y
>filename
Is that supposed to be "Ford" or the German word for "horse"
...
enjoy your pigfat
Thanks, i will
this guy got it, four eyed foxbody for badass 80s plus performance
Can't decide between dagumi stang or grandfather's...
The newest one, obviously.
fresh from this morning.
Mine's on the right
Fucking mouthbreathers on this board can't tell that it's a Mustang fascia shopped onto an E30.
Everyone knows. Only newbie teens point it out
4 eye fox body
...
Free bird intensifies in the distance
To be fair, first gen Mustangs are pretty light too, as are SN95s. Assuming a good, all OEM car to begin with the first gen will need more shit upgraded to be fast meaning more expense and it has a worse crash rating. In reality though a slightly rusty one you just buy to fuck with will be less likely to break apart than a third gen in the same condition and if it actually is all-original you'll be paying a premium for that. It's all pretty subjective, not just on the surface by your personal aesthetics (most people prefer the 1st gen's looks) but also deeply, based on what you want to get from owning them both in the short term and long term.
But yeah, first and third are the only ones currently worth owning. Time will tell if the newest ones are worth it after depreciation fully sets in but it seems to me like GM has made a better pony for nigh on 20 years now.
>intentionally ricocheting off guardrails
>tears them up too bad to use them on his second pass
>"fucking nips can't build a durable goddamn guardrail"
THE CHOICE IS YOURS MY FRIEND
...
Newest models are nice but they feel too try-hard.
Aesthetically I think the 2005-2014 models are best.
The current one. The lack of independent rear suspension all those years was awful.
SN95 (94-95)
I loved mine.
>Foxbody
Reminder that the only good Mustangs are 64-69 and 94-98.
you forgot the 2003 & 2004 cobras, autismo.
>New Edge
gtfo
the 03 & 04 cobras were L I T E R A L L Y the best fucking mustangs ever made
try to prove me wrong
>protip: you cant!!!!11!!!!1!!
yeah objectively
but I dont care about that
Terminator swapped Bubblestang is best but I dont guess it counts do it
>foxbody is trash
>sn95 is good
I got some bad news for you, user
what
that the SN95 is just an updated Fox platform?
Bubblestang doesnt look awful like the Foxbody and it has some much needed improvements to the chassis
Ill admit that the 82 GT gives me tingles tho
>some will say its fake
Holy fuck this is amazing.
>thinking this was a good mustang
Lmao I knew that image looked weird, thanks
>did you mean the ford escort 2 door.
Has a nice A S T H E T I C to it
I love how everyone is talking about the Mustang while the car in the OP is 95% 3series and 5% Mustang
B8 wasn't good enough m8
>mouthbreathers
What did he mean by this?
>94-98
lmfao those don't even look american, you could mistake them for a jap car
You say that like it's a bad thing.
the Original Mustang looked European
68-73 I would say look American
the Mustang II took Euro cues
the Foxbody looked like a Euro shitbox
the SN-95 looked Japanese
New Edge on look American
wtf that pic looks like utter shit m8
looks like some Honda culture took that sn95 over
I will always have a soft spot for the S197 Bullitt mustangs. I have always thought they looked and sounded excellent.
...
>wtf that pic looks like utter shit m8
no
>looks like some Honda culture took that sn95 over
its beautiful
kek
I like these, is that bad?
I'm not an American, so newest gen is best because Aussies can actually buy it, then genwun, then whatever series that had IRS. SN95 Terminator wasn't it?
>four-eyed foxbody
>badass performance
more like ass performance
early 80s foxbodies were the second worst performing Mustangs after the Mustang IIs of the 1970s
The performance started to get back to somewhere respectable after 1986 when the malaise era ended.
Best Mustangs are the 64-73 era, followed by the 2015-now ones and the 2005-2014 ones after that.
>more like ass performance
I shouldn't find this so funny but I do, thanks for the keks user
>Best Mustangs are the 64-73 era, followed by the 2015-now ones and the 2005-2014 ones after that.
Agree with this one, the originals have the best looks and a massive aftermarket. Current ones won't kill you on the toegay and have a decent interior finally. SN95 could also handle but I woudln't trust it anywhere curvy that isn't a track.
See, this is exactly why I don't like people who dislike malaise era cars. They're perfect starting points for making something sweet for really cheap. There is a metric fuckton of aftermarket for turd gens and foxbodies, yet I cannot think of any other two cars that are more relentlessly shat upon. They have low ratings from the factory, but now that almost all of them are 25, if you don't live in commifornia, you can make them make closer to what they should have fairly easily. Drop the cat, slap on a 4 barrel, advance the timing, and if you're really into it, a more radical cam. Just those will bump up these cars to more respectable power ratings in the 200s, and everyone forgets they actually had pretty good torque from the factory.
If that's not enough power for you, they're also stupidly easy to swap since they're not new enough to have a bunch of computer fuckery to deal with, and there are tons of people making bolt on kits to ls swap third gens or 302/351/4.6 swap foxes. Bear in mind that these cars also have much more chassis development than their pigfat earlier counterparts that boomers love so much, so once you throw in something with comparable power they'll absolutely destroy one around a track.
This
no such thing as an sn95 terminator
New Edge are still SN-95s.
>Best Mustangs are the 64-73 era
For looks. Drivetrain and brakes and suspension are long obsolete but easy to replace.
I think these are the best looking desu.
I think the front looks good. The last quarter from the b-pillar back looks chunky and ugly, especially the tail lights.
Had one, was fucking fun as all hell.
>The last quarter from the b-pillar back looks chunky and ugly
agreed
I like the taillights though.
Why is this thread still there.
Because some faggot keeps bumping
t. GM shills
Get on my level.
It's a Cobra, innit ?
lmfao truly worst gen
2011-2014 Mustang 5.0's
1973 Best Year
I mean seriously. Look at that Landau top! The length of the hood. There must be something mighty under there.
Either E30 or E21. E36 already looks void of personality.
This is the best looking modern-ish Mustang
I like the first gen too, though.
t. Yuro
Fastbacks looked amazing.
They should've adopted this rear end during the 2005-2014 era
2004 Cobra and Mach 1
2010-12 GT500
when was the last time i hated an user this much for one post?
>gm
>ever
oink oink
^this.