Just a thought...

StonedTime
StonedTime

Chevrolet seriously considered making a turbine powered truck. Could you imagine what things would be like if this had been made?

Other urls found in this thread:

oldcarsweekly.com/news/hobby-news/tag-team_trucking
roadandtrack.com/new-cars/news/a7284/walmart-turbine-hybrid-aero-semi/

StrangeWizard
StrangeWizard

So did Ford

A 600-hp turbine engine propelled Big Red and offered a 600-mile cruising range from its 280-gallon fuel capacity. At full capacity, the power plant could pull 170,000 pounds, which was a combined weight of tractor, trailers and cargo.

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

looks like something out of fallout

Crazy_Nice
Crazy_Nice

Imagine how crazy it would be if Tesla made a big rig. That's just too far fetched though, will probably never happen. You would probably need 8 90kwh packs to power it.

haveahappyday
haveahappyday

Its turbine generates electricity for the 4 electric motors on the rear wheels

Bidwell
Bidwell

Here's a good read to go with this thread.

oldcarsweekly.com/news/hobby-news/tag-team_trucking

Snarelure
Snarelure

barely 2MPG
Was this supposed to be impressive at the time?

Flameblow
Flameblow

early 60's
600 hp
2mpg pulling 170,000 pounds

IDK user, you tell me.

LuckyDusty
LuckyDusty

So no?

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

I dunno, going deaf every time one of them pulled up next to you at a light?

iluvmen
iluvmen

early 60's
hp
That's not impressive at all, they had engines that did nearly twice that in the 40's.
mpg pulling 170,000 pounds
I mean I guess?

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

how original, what a genius this telsa fucktard is

Garbage Can Lid
Garbage Can Lid

would have been a nightmare to maintain and your truck mechanic is now a jet mechanic

haveahappyday
haveahappyday

on the other hand, used semis would be priceless among pilot enthusiasts and people alike. Same like motorhomes are good source of big block V8s.

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

Walmart did it too.

roadandtrack.com/new-cars/news/a7284/walmart-turbine-hybrid-aero-semi/

CouchChiller
CouchChiller

thanks for this

Walmart is turning to its truck fleet to reduce overhead
The trailer uses single-piece 53-foot-long carbon-fiber panels

Bidwell
Bidwell

The most common engines in the '50s and '60s were in the 2-300 HP range.
743/855 Cummins (220-335 HP)
6-71 Detroit (238HP)
Mack Thermodyne (
IHC V-549 (235 HP)

600 HP was a lot for a truck engine back then. Fuel mileage sucked donkey dick, too. A bobtail IHC V200 with a 549 gets about 5MPG.

lostmypassword
lostmypassword

lel I forgot to add the Thermodyne's HP rating. They were right around the 200 Hp mark.

Sharpcharm
Sharpcharm

Tesla's dead you dumbass

And who said that every product ever made has to be completely original all the time? Will you bitch that the Chevy Volt is shit because it isn't original either?

whereismyname
whereismyname

its piss, its sickening

Evil_kitten
Evil_kitten

Mammonth Car?

SomethingNew
SomethingNew

I doubt it would be hard to come up with a decent muffler system to reduce sound output, especially by routing the exhaust up top like most trucks already do

w8t4u
w8t4u

Currently we have engines making 1,500 hp but 600hp on a truck is a lot.

Also 170,000 lbs is 70 tonnes. Trucks are limited to 44tons these days.

Methshot
Methshot

Turbines don't have to be complicated. The M1 Abrams runs off of a turbine powerplant, and being in the military they have some real retarded fucks working on shit like that.

Being on the road, it would'nt have to be as close-tolerance and have as many redundancies as an aircraft engine, and just like anything else if a part breaks you just replace it. It'd be more expensive for parts, absolutely, but it wouldn't be any more complicated to work on.

Emberburn
Emberburn

The "noisiest" turbines are the ones using thrust to propel the vehicle. The turboshafts can be very quiet

DeathDog
DeathDog

Turbines aren't scary

Crazy_Nice
Crazy_Nice

Why are they only doing this now in semi trucks when locomotives been doing this for years?

isnt this method a lot more fuel efficient?

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

What absolute cock-smoking retards.
Next: GM/Ford introduce nuclear explosion propelled pickup truck concepts.

SniperWish
SniperWish

I'd bet on weight reasons. I believe the max weight of truck, trailer and load on most states is 80 thousand pounds. A heavier truck means you can't move as much cargo, so you don't make as much money

Deadlyinx
Deadlyinx

it actually is less effecient.

But you dont need a transmission.

I dont think it'd be weight. Truckerfag said that truck transmissions are just over 200lb. A 150kw generator (generator itself not the engine) is around 100lbs and then the motors for that power will be about 50lbs each wheel.

Firespawn
Firespawn

So tell me, what would things have been like?

lostmypassword
lostmypassword

You joke, but there were a few nuclear powered concepts from the 50s-60s
Ford Nucleon
Simca Fulgar
Ford Seattle-ite XXI
and pic related >Studebaker Packard Astral

Emberburn
Emberburn

They weren't nuclear powered. They weren't powered at all. They were just design studies with the marketing shouting NUCULAR for publicity.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit