Eurofag here. Am interested in buying one of those, V8 of course.
Could any ameritower enlighten me with the biggest differences between those? Except from the looks of course.
Camaro Mustang Challenger V8
Camden Watson
Other urls found in this thread:
topgear.com
twitter.com
Blake Flores
Angel Sullivan
Camaro, more thoroughbred then the Mustang, more purpose built for speed and performance, and a more complete package.
Mustang, the originator, the icon, the one that people identify as pure, unadulterated, Americana sportscar.
Challenger, the much larger car is also much more comfortable to live with on a daily basis. Think of it as a touring car with sports car aspirations. Only get the V8, anything smaller is a disappointment.
Gabriel Perry
Thanks mate, that was quick and helpful
Josiah Harris
...
Asher Turner
Buy a Mustang. The Challenger is too big for comfort in Europe, and the Camaro is a silly fucking cuntmobile with absolute horse shit visibility and practicality.
Justin Taylor
Also the Challenger isn't officially sold in Europe, only grey imported, so have fun finding repair shops and parts.
Josiah Stewart
OP again. To me, only the 2017 Challenger still looks like a "real" muscle car. The 2017 Mustang and Camaro barely have anything left in common with their classic predecessors on the outside.
Jeremiah Scott
For me challenger is best because it's roomy, comfortable, and the most practical of the three. Also all the roads where I live are big and straight. But the car is huge. Its size might not be so practical on European roads.
Matthew Nelson
Challenger is a muscle car, so in a league of it's own.
Mustang and Camaro are so evenly matched that the driver will make the difference in terms of performance, and running costs are about the same. Only way to know which one to get, is to test drive both.
>The Challenger is too big for comfort in Europe
If you suck at driving. A Challenger isn't really that much bigger than an S-class.