Will stancing get me laid?

Just for looks, sure you have a lower center of gravity, but it also lowers the turning radius and seriously damages the suspension, rims, axles etc.

If you want a lower center of gravity you are better of just lowering your car.

muh camber / stance fags tend to try and justify their stupidity by claiming race cars also have camber

race cars however dont have extreme camber / stance and the roads they drive on are much more flat then a regular road is

short answer no

long answer it literally just depends on multiple factors

when your car is on a track and experiencing gravitational force in certain direction the cambered wheel helps maintain traction, but only so much

>be me
>be 16
>at bowling alley one Friday with some friends
>guy in a kitted and stance BMW 3 series drives through the lot
>takes the one route with a speed bump in the entire parking lot
>front wheels up
>starts to go at an angle
>awful scraping noises from the body kit
>we offer to help push him over
>"No you kids will ruin it"
>takes 15 minutes to admit to beaching it
>we're just watching in awe
>has to call a friend to rear end him off the speed bump
>go and bowl another game

God is everyone on Veeky Forums fucking retarded?
It's almost like there is an anti stance cool aid being drunk and the information from it is just as bad as the stance pricks.
Lowering your car changes what part of the suspension curve you sit in. Depending on the car this may mean you need other mods to keep things handling well. My car will lose camber in the front as it gets lower so I will need to compensate with camber plates.
LOWERING CARS DOES NOT FUCK THEM UP UNLESS YOU GO EXTREME.
Sure with stock shocks and lowering springs it will ride like crap and burn through the shocks very quickly but you aren't damaging the car.
Lowering a car lowers its centre of gravity which means better handling. Adding camber CAN increase grip. For a road car I would go as far as 2.5 negative depending on what it is. If the camber gain in the travel is good you can run less and have more dynamic camber anyway.
Older race cars would run upto 5 degree.
Now stop spreading shit

did you even read what half the people you quoted said

Stance kids take shit to the extreme.
The picture you posted is of a car that raced with 5 degree up front. So on the extreme end of it.

Stop being so scared of camber. Stance kids run like 10-15 degree

lowering can damage the subframe if driven badly, it's just more likely not absolute.
older cars running larger camber was mostly because suspension tech was shit and tires had bigger sidewalls and flex which compensated for it when not turning
stance is just badly received because it's not just a few bad apples that get attention, but they group up and act like their way is the only way.

Did you read what I wrote?
People in this thread are saying 1 degree is the limit for a road car.
It's not.
Lots of people run around 2.5 as daily's. Stop being so anti stance that it changes what you think is right

If you have a car whose suspension geometry changes through its travel in that way (basically if you have MacPherson strut) then a. You will actually find lowering the car introduces negative camber at rest and b. Why are you modifying a compromise car instead of saving up to buy something with double wishbone that will handle better stock and respond better to mods