Then the judge could deem probably cause reasonable but the other charges not. :^) i sent in a written declaration after all
Law thread
Well that was an interesting reason to ban me because i was certain i was talking and made threads about autom- oh. Motor vehicles, I see.
Welp looks like i rallied and armed some autistic anons who probably have nothing to lose but to attempt this in court or at the very least shitpost infinitely for me. Enjoy your new non-commercial cancer, Veeky Forums
I really am proud of you're autism though, kids. Heres one about the T-model I liked a lot.
---
Driving automobiles has objectively become safer. It is our culture to know the laws of road. Everyone knows what a speed limit is before that are a liable adult. The model t is a death trap compared to modern automobiles when considering saftey standards.
Nothing about driving automobiles has become more unsafe. The public is and has been more away of the laws and the cars produced has strict safety codes that trump any old car used.
You are on no logical grounds to deem driving a private home asset automobile on public road as an individual not registered in any form to the dmv "unsafe" and "outdated"
---
>What is speed?
Model T had a top speed of 60 mph. Speed limits were introduced because of this. Top speed is irrelevant if its illegal to ever go that fast on that street.
>What is driver error?
You cant make a law enforcing the permit on a constitutional right because fear of error of an individual. You have to prove the individual is making errors to revoke
--
Solid notion to be proposed in court as most of our traffic safety, laws ect had been around before and during the automobiles thus judges must have considered the safety an automobile(since they were more dangerous back then) endangers when recognizing it as a vehicle you have a right to travel in. Unregistered automobiles and non-commercial users aren't an immediate threat to the public in itself.
Duck the cucks!
Duck the cucks!
Duck the cucks!
Duck the cucks!
Duck the cucks!
Duck the cucks!
Daily reminder it's been five days and the sovereign law cuck still CANNOT POST A SINGLE CASE where this bullshit was tried and won
Cant do anything but quote out of context lines from cases that have absolutely nothing to do with 'operating' an unregistered car while unlicensed
DO YOU PERHAPS PREFER.. MY
PRIVATE NON COMMERCIAL PERSONAL HOUSE ASSET AUTOMOBILES?
(my private non commercial personal house asset automobiles)
CAUSE IM SOVERIGN NOT A DRIVER(In the commercial individual legally defined context)
>not understanding what my plan is
Oh, but user... There are plenty of people who have nothing to lose if they try this lurking and posting, don't we? There is a reason this particular board was selected.
WTF i hate the DMV even more now??!