4 cylinder engines

>Lane departure warning
>Parallel park assist
>Blind spot monitoring
>Backup cameras

>German Engineering

>Needing pistons in your engine
Literally 19th century technology

I miss rotors.
A shame they never developed them past the 90s. Even if they are technically inferior it's such a cool fucking concept and they seemed to be way more power efficient at the time for how many liters they had

>anything by Americans

>160hp from an NA 1.3L weighing in at about 150lbs
If you know how to properly take care of them, the only downsides are fuel and oil consumption, and low torque.

>Going subsonic speeds

>only 1 overhead cam

>jet without wings

Oh, and let's not forget the Renesis, which is also an NA 1.3L and puts out over 230hp stock. The numbers I gave were for an 89-91 FC.

No sir, that's a car with jet engines.

This is a jet without wings.

>having cylinders

>having a car

>Volkswagen Auto Group

>4 cylinders in a straight line

>being unable to do anything but 0-60 and highway pulls like a chimp

Wow my perspective in this image has been shattered. I always thought the black and red bit in the back was a chair.

>getting 10mpg on your over-compensating v8

>being so poor you give a shit about gas mileage

>gas
>not diesel

>pushrods

19mpg actually. And you are just jelly you drive a children's car.

They make a lot of power because they can consume and combust fuel very rapidly

>he thinks 19mpg is good for muh vee ayte

>V4

>he's still trying to pretend he's worth a damn

>$40k Ford Focus and Volkswagen Golf

>V4½ engine

That's what my glorious steel folded 1000 times over 90s 4cyl nipbox gets

>no replacement for displacement

This is some throwback shitposting right here

>crummy chinametal americunt v8 explodes within 80k miles of light daily driving
>grorious japanu engine block lasts 300k on pure track time

are you even trying, musclefags?

>mfw my old camaro actually spun a rod bearing at 80k

>engine
>mounts