3.5L V6

also slower

oh look its this thread again

how many of these do we need?

Grills

>EcoBoost V6
"Your car is so cute user, it matches your little man;)"

>Murican V8
"Choke me daddy!"

wow the twin turbo engine made 50 more hp
my mind is blown

nearly 2 hundred lbs lighter

mfw

i wonder how much the tt v6 costs vs the v8

>he needs a car to attract a mate

>supercharger @ 9.2psi
>Twin Turbos @ 30psi
>V6 needs to move more than 3 times the air to beat a V8 by less than 8%

>having big ass pluses on the body
Who thought it was a good idea

>30 psi
wrong

>pressure=airflow

modern web design is shit
giant buttons and little text

>implying girls remotely care about shit like that

Hello virgin

caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-ford-gt-supercar-first-ride-review
you're right in the sense of CFM, but airflow is only relevant with such a unit when the air pressure is the same.
think about it, 1 cubic foot per minute at 1 atmosphere is not the same as 1 cubic foot per minute at 2 atmospheres
caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-ford-gt-supercar-first-ride-review
did they typo or something? how much is it boosting to?

rxc turbo runs at a lower psi.

how'd they get the larger figure? higher redline?

who knows. it still btfo pushcuck

ecoboost is revolutionary

>at the apex of straight line speed, there are no engines that aren't Hemi V8s
>at the apex of track speed, the production car kings are v8s or v10s
>f1 cars were just cucked to lower RPM v6 configs like two years ago
>UHHH WHY DO PEOPLE USE V8S LOL FUCKING MURRICANS

I'm here to talk about engines, not fanboy. do you think they are running custom heads? more efficient intake runs than the GT due to easier packaging? or are these figures wheel horsepower and the RXC just has a lighter driveline with less loss.

ecoboost in gt is mostly stock. can easily btfo pushshit

and has less hp
weird how that works

wrong.

it has 700 hp

proof because i've only seen 650hp and lower versions

HOW DO YOU IDIOTS NOT RECOGNIZE ALPHONSE THREADS BY NOW JESUS CHRIST
DO
NOT
REPLY
IT IS THAT SIMPLE

oh, made it sound like the Radical made more power than the GT. radicalsportscars.com/car/rxc-600r/
says 650 flywheel right on their site
the RXC turbo (everything but the 600r) is using the 3.5l from the SHO

the problem isn't some shiteater making threads, it's people who know nothing about cars replying in agreement

DELETE THIS

see

Most of the time there not.

ok? someone was claiming 700, 650 doesn't equal 700

Girls don't care.

Citation needed.

I'm sure you could ecu flash it to 700 if you don't value the engine

see
it makes 700 hp though in top trim

>still 0 proof

as many as it takes to make gm fangirls either see the light or recall themselves

geeky-gadgets.com/radical-unveils-700bhp-rxc-turbo-500r-2016-03-03/

gm fangirls on suicide watch

ok so a 3.5 ecoboost with new turbos and likely new tune to work with them makes 700hp
that's some good power

weird.
now we have a
>N/A 3.7l V6 (350-380HP)
>Turbo 500 (454HP)
>Turbo 500r (600HP)
>Turbo 500r (700HP)
>Turbo 600r (650HP)
from the looks of it, the 600r is the GT's 3.5l motor and the 500/500r's are the SHO motor (also 3.5l) (obviously modified)

shit's confusing, no wonder people argue about this car's specs so much

ford gt motor is practically an f150 motor

Or is the f150 almost a Ford GT motor. You got to think positively.

different motor design, the F150 Ecoboost is closest to the SHO and Explorer Sport. both motors just happen to be 3.5l, DI and turbo

wrong. gt shares 70% of its parts with f150

If you reply to these threads, you are very smart.

what's the differing components? I assume it's just more forged parts, cam and valve work. the only other thing I could think of that is a major difference is if the GT is dry sump (don't know for sure but it makes sense for a supercar)

im right here bitch, bring your fucking 3.5L
ill give it to you in the street,track or circuit
fuck wit me

op is so upset at gm that he'll just keep bumping the thread anyway

>550tq
back to the drawing board BITCH!

>torque
>relevant

If you want to win races, yes.

Then why did the corvette lose to the Ford GT at lemans?

uh oh, retard alert.

rocks mostly

did someone say gravel?

BTFO

>forced induction high strung engine that will last the warranty period and not much longer without breaking
>NA easygoing engine that will last forever with routine oil changes
Gee I wonder why burgers love pigfat veeates.

>LT4
>NA

Protip: its the shiteater samefagging.

...

Imagine what a DOHC GDI Turbo V* could do, OP...

What kind of cuck cares about stock engines? Which one will be more reliable at 4 figure power levels? That's what I thought.

>$500k V6 700hp
>$62k V8 650hp

why did it take ford so much more money to only make 50 more horsepower?

Bitch I drive a Honda CR-V with 250,000 miles on it and my GF calls me daddy and begs me to choke her every time we fuck. Now what?

.

sperg more

Here's your (you)

sperg more

ayy calabogie

This. Also, as much as american cars are shit...

>The ls is lighter than a v6.

Go ahead, weigh a vr38dett vs a ls7.

A ecoboost v6 weighs 400 lbs and makes 700 hp. a ls weighs 450 lbs and makes less than 500 hp.

try again cuck

That's the weight of the engine without the turbos

wrong.

The ecoboost is 420lbs dry without the accessories. Take your pigfat boat anchor somewhere else.

wrong

You're trying to weigh the engine without it's turbos, in which case give it's real HP figure.

It's nothing without it's turbos.

The LS makes more power per kg of engine weight and you CANNOT handle that fact, so you're trying to sidestep and dodge the argument.

You think you're shitposting and are a great troll because you act like a retard and people respond, but getting someone to respond was never what a good troll does. A good troll backs someone like you into a corner from which they cannot escape, with superior arguments designed to illicit butthurt.

And you are butthurt. You'll respond to me predictably with your memes, sidestepping the facts because there is no getting around the fact the LS is better than your v6 trash.

And this is coming from someone who does not even like american cars.

ug

using/haveing engine in v configuration instead of boxer/inline6 engine

>why would anyone use a V8 anymore

Linear power and torque delivery means nothing to you does it.

I buy v8's because a measly v6 will not haul wood like a v8 can. That v6 will whine and while while the v8 is indifferent to the load.

wrong

Haha yeah

Now add Twin Turbos to the V8 too
youtu.be/Bv0nqR9YpBU

instant erection

Let me help

God knows how much torque this thing has
youtu.be/he1qHZRDyLY

>torque
>relevant

That's a two-stroke semi truck motor, so yes, torque is relevant

not in supercars

Most "supercars" are pigfat beasts. Yes, They need torque. c'mon man this is like grade 4 math and science.

>torque
>relevant
not everyone is hauling your mother around

It's not a supercar engine. If you put a two-stroke into a supercar you're insane. Still, torque is important in a car. I feel like you're on a different page here. But if you want nice sounding performance engines here's some retro examples

Inline 8
youtu.be/QgomL-RXLVo

F1 V12
youtu.be/6s7hf9-IeqY

And here's a bonus backfire from a TT V10 @2:08
youtu.be/H0JRMBGrab0