I really like how it looks, actually.
Low tech
>parts only from UK
>parts made upon request
>parts like fiberglass nosecone and spaceframe components are complicated
>most parts require modification to fit each individual car
>any paint work requires whole respray because really thin paint
pic related, had to fix one of these assholes
first gen was the best
same with miata, 1st gen the best, 2nd ok, 3th pretty ugly and 4th is pretty great again
maybe the same will happen to mr2?
but
>implying there ever will be a 4th gen mr2
fuck you toyota, and your business choices
It's probably the best looking toyota other than the supra
nothing of value was lost
>MR2
>4th gen
You "two" are the only ones I know that think that.
All the proportions are wrong. The cabin actually needs to be moved forward. The cabin is at an awkward place because the cabin isn't far enough backward to make it look like a front engine car, but it's not far enough forward to make it look like a midengine car.
The headlights and taillights both protrude awkwardly like tumours, and the front and rear end look oddly similar, which is why the cars look SO much better with a wing/lip off the rear.
I think they were trying to mimick the look of the front end of the AW11 without being able to use popups. The grill is similar, the rectangular lights that protrude from the body, and the two lines in the hood.
Be hopeful my friends. Toyota has been hunting at it for the past year.
roadandtrack.com
>appeal to popularity
Just say you don't like it and be done with it.
>"Argumentum ad populum" uses the opinions of others as support
I wasn't using it as support, I was making a statement which is why I separated it from the rest of my arguement.
Also, I would be "appealing to popularity" if I didn't voice the reasons for my opinion.
Honestly, just never do that shit again because it's retarded. I don't even care if you tried to separate it from your person opinion.