Because they didn't sell
Stops making evo
Juan Roberts
Gavin Stewart
only the absolute poorest fuck old people drive those
Liam Roberts
a big mistake to get rid of the evo because it makes younger people look up it and they buy from the brand 10 years later, hard to believe but mitsubishi was once considered to be about as good as toyota, mazda or nissan in the 90s for cars and trucks but now they have worse brand recognition than hyundai. Not having a halo car will bite them in a few years once the cuv fad moves on since car makes from the past that dropped their halo cars have suffered and some went out of business. By not having a halo car, it causes a generation of people to not have any enthusiasm for the brand but the problem doesn't happen straight away.
Blake Hall
Mitsubishi doesn't build the R5 iirc.
Plus they probably cost over 100k
Parker Hughes
>Is your ps suitable for terrain in there?
It's Russia m8, I can find roads that can literally swallow a tank. But a PS will generally get you to 98% of places you would want to get to.
>4d56 vgt?
Obviously, I don't know who buys the petrol V6 that gets 10mpg and comes with 80% higher tax to boot.
Wyatt Nelson
Fat housewife's life is meaningless too.
Aaron Hughes
Its a business so it was money related they only sold like 5 EVOs a year they sucked
Nathaniel Ortiz
Similar to the s2000 its supply and demand, they are rare in good condition
Michael Walker
Think its time for a new Starion desu
Jason Cox
>New Starion
You know it's coming but its nothing that you imagined or wanted.
>Starion Cross
There you go. A smaller version of the eclipse cross with the same engine, platform but lower roofline and even less all around visibility. Also only comes with a CVT just for (you).