Why aren't inline 6s more common in modern sports/pony cars? They just seem so perfect

because BMW have taken a lot of compromises. they invested in a long front end, RWD, and tilted the engine so it could would have a lower profile. so they have a smooth engine in a sporty layout, but they can't use that engine for a FWD layout and they can't use that chassis for a FWD layout

Yeah this. Ford uses V6 because they like to turn their engines 90 degrees and put them in their SUVs/crossovers. For example the 3.5 and 2.7 ecoboost is mounted transverse in the explorer and longitudinally in the F150. Neither are sports cars but you get the point. Maybe a better example would be the FoRS and ecoboost mustang

i dont see how long front and rwd is a compromise
all bimmers have a low cog and 50/50 weight balance, that is the best you can get for a f/r car

Attached: 80589763-E6F3-47C6-AD6F-EE13F8FA3067.jpg (1280x960, 178K)

sex

Attached: 1516378463532.jpg (1920x1280, 713K)

because not everyone wants an expensive RWD car. most people look for a FWD car that is cheaper

thats why bmw uses their mini platforms for shitboxes

idk if you could call a mini a shitbox. they're pretty fun to drive

And that FR configuration works even better with a shorter, more centralised mass V6.

My nigga

God's gift to mankind coming through

Attached: 19059672_811478529011997_8686271464824979243_n.jpg (510x473, 34K)

Is this some sort of prank?
I mean VR5? Seriously?

There is a reason they don't make them any-more, user. They have shit efficiency and even with DOHC and 20 valves they only managed to get 168 hp and 220 nm (162 lb ft., I assume you're a yank since you have absolutely no idea how absolute shit that VAG piece of garbage is) out of them. Which is nothing more than appalling for a 2.3 litre 5 cylinder.