Except its not even close to the AWD system the WRX has, the WRX's AWD gives 50% to the front and rear at all times where the Ford RS is literally 100% power to the front except when you lose traction to the rear.
If the wrx is so bad, then what's the alternative for sporty, awd cars that aren't super expensive like the 911?
Nolan Lopez
Jose Collins
> the Ford RS is literally 100% power to the front except when you lose traction to the rear.
If you lack a fundamental understanding of how the drive train even works, why do you feel your opinion is valid on the subject? And even if the RS had a "fake" AWD system (whatever that means) it's still faster than the STI so maybe a "real" AWD system (whatever that means) isn't such a great thing after all.
Nathan Wright
>no SX4 mentioned.
I'm disappointed in you Veeky Forums
Mason Robinson
>low energy “do what you want” damage control poster
not based
Ryan Thompson
Its literally a retrofitted Focus ST, the AWD system is the same as a CRV or any other reactive AWD system.
Parker Lewis
You don't need AWD, RWD is more fun. Most AWD cars are mostly 80% FWD anyway.
>B-But muh snow
Just don't be an idiot and keep your foot off of the throttle when it's skipp.
Jayden Stewart
>you don't need
fuck off with what I do and don't need you flaming faggot.
Alexander Adams
its not a problem with the platform, it’s with the 2014 new generation they suck
>pigfat
>bad tune
>fa engine sucks
>understeer
>shit yota esque styling
get a 2013 and previous rex, 2009 and previous legacy gt, or a 2008 and previous forester xt, and youre fucking golden
James Williams
It factually isn't. Again, you lack a basic understanding of the car's drive train, therefore your opinion is invalid sure to ignorance.
Joseph Wood
>factually it isn't a reactive AWD system
boy are you fucking retarded. It is an on-demand system and even then if you turn the knob to be 70% RWD the differential will just overheat because its so small and shit.