Why is Socialism a dirty word?

It seems like the media completely ignores the successes of socialism, like the medical care available in Cuba. This in turn leads to further misinformation about socialism within the public, getting them to vote in ways that are not within their interest.

How do we stop socialism being a dirty word?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-capitalism
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Maybe it's because the failures of socialism tend to loom over muh healthcare omg we live like two years longer on average than the americans because they shoot each other too fucking much lmao suck it!!!

don't even bother making these threads, all you'll get is helicopter memes and "kill the commies lol"

Sometimes I wish we could have an educated discussion on socialism. All you seem to get is epic /pol/ may-mays and psudohistoric capitalist propaganda.

So is "social democrat" the term for somebody who supports some elements of socialism (worker's rights, a welfare state, etc.) to protect an overall capitalist system with no goal of eventually transitioning to pure socialism?

Because whatever successes socialism has had (such as a working health care system) are not exclusive to it but its massive, mass-murdering failures are.

>Because whatever successes capitalism has had (such as mild technological successes) are not exclusive to it but its massive, mass-murdering failures are.

I would say socdems are socialists. If you get them to list good things about the current society, it's usually things like 40 hour week and minimuim wage, not you can exploit the workers for profit

>implying proper, "seize the means of production" socialism has ever worked at improving living standards

If people aren't taking you seriously, sometimes there's a reason.

>implying marxist shits don't call every argument that disagrees with their religion "capitalist propaganda"

You people destroyed the ecology of Siberia and expect me to pay homage to your delusions. Fuck you.

"Capitalism" isn't a descriptive term, it is a snarl world subversives came up with to mean "everything I don't like" and to make it look like all the world's problems are systemic in origin. Thus capitalism doesn't have failures because "capitalism" as such isn't a thing.

Socialism, on the other hand, is a concrete movement, and can be attributed the horrible failures it had.

(and, to add to that, no government in modern history has ever come anywhere close to the death toll of socialism in regard to ITS OWN CITIZENS IN PEACETIME.)

>"Capitalism" isn't a descriptive term
>an economic system where the capital is primarily in private hands

bam, solved it

At 1955 the cuban revolution still hadn't happened. they were under Batista's government at that time.

That's the point I was making, yes.

Communists stole Cuba's chance of becoming the Macau of the west, and then passed it off as an accomplishment.

Collectivism leads to mass murder and genocide under authoritarian socialist fascist regimes, free market capitalism and individualism does not

>country is a poor shithole with barely enough to eat
>people get arrested arbitrarily and are not given any human rights (when not killed without trial)
>citizens can't even leave the country
>b-but muh healthcare
Socialism will stop being a dirty word when there won't be any people stupid enough to think it's a valid political ideology left alive.

None of those were socialist, those were all capitalists.

(You)

>everything i don't like is socialism
>500 trillion
>capitalism dindu nothing

There is so much wrong with this post and image

...

>Nazism was socialism
>socialist fascist

>capitalism doesn't exist
>muh subversives

>what is state capitalism

>muh 100 billion trillion gorillion
Hitler wasn't a fucking socialist you revisionist moron.
It's possible to leave Cuba. It's just quite difficult unless you're a doctor or such on a mission abroad.

There are some opinion polls that seem to show that younger generations of Americans hold a more positive opinion of socialism than the older generations, but their entire understanding of socialism seems to be based on Scandinavian style social democracy (publicly funded healthcare and college, etc.). If socialism somehow becomes popular in America it won't be called socialism.

A buzzword that is an attempt at saving face that ends up being swallowed by the dishonest and the retarded.

Not an argument.

neither was you input shit, shit outputs

Because any attempt at universal organization is seen as premodern. Really, any objective racionalism is, meaning believing in anything outside the self, like god, equality, or peace. This as a consequence of the advancement of science as the paradigm for reason, and capitalism's inherent tendency to make people selfish.

For this society asking whether equality is better than inequality is irrelevant because it can't be proven scientifically.

Weirdly enough, the concept of nation after the French Revolution was based on a similar metaphysical objective rationalism as a religion, but instead of using "revelation" as a way to legitimize power, they used "reason", having the nation as a god.

However, nowadays the reason behind the existence of a nation (as a supreme entity) doesn't hold, because capitalism alienates us from those objective ideas (from society and shared goals). And as we know, when reason flakes, it becomes susceptible to ideological puppetry and lies. We are being indoctrined everyday by the capitalist system itself (understood as the people on top, because capitalism isn't democratic), building a dogma in which to base its reason for existing.

yeah this is totally accurate. tons of people i know equate socialism with social democracy and consider it a revised version of socialism rather than a separate thing, and are very fond of it. at least where I live (in a pretty liberal state) this definitely seems to be majority view of younger generations.

Don't worry, these classcucks will get what's coming to them.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-capitalism

REEEEEEEEE
Not a Nazi
Not a stormfag
Not a polfag
Not even anti-socialist
Not even pro capitalist
Nazism was absolutely socialism
REEEEEEEEEE

>anti-capitalism means socialism
Just leave.

>owning things is a system
"Marxist intellectuals"

It's literally called "National Socialism" genius.

Socialist is what communists call themselves, just like nazis call themselves nationalists now.

You know why people want rich capitalists in charge instead of some socialist bernout? Its not because we like them. Its because Socialism is an immature philosophy. Their system fails every time and then they blame their failures on the rich or the USA, just as nazis blamed minorities. We've grown too soft on commies and now their bullshit is creeping too far.

Have you ever seen cuba? Its a messy poor shithole. But hey, the healthcare is cheaper so it must be better than USA right?

Collectivism is aids, long live individualism.

>literally nazi's
/thread though

>Marxists invented the idea of capitalism

>Nazism was absolutely socialism

Sigh. Did private property exist? If yes, it's capitalism.

>he thinks capitalist dictatorships are socialist

Because all socialist regimes end up violating human rights badly.

>Why is Socialism a dirty word?

That's only true if you're an ameri*an.

>human rights

This. The parts of Europe that are untainted by American cultural imperials (Sweden, Denmark) quite like socialism.

>free market capitalism and individualism does not
It offshores the mass murder and immiseration until the system starts cracking then it re-imports it.

>confusing socialism and social democracy

Pls stop this, there's no such thing as socialism in the Nordic countries

>The party was created as a means to draw workers away from communism and into völkisch nationalism

Why do you SJWs hate White people?

Because capitalism will gradually bring back about a post scarcity fully automated utopia as long as we allow it to run its course meanwhile a global socialist revolution led by college aged sociology majors will send us all back to the Stone Age.

This entire thread is non-sensical. Socialism is not considered a dirty word.

/thread

Socialists are just mad because Capitalism is a proven success story whereas socialism is a proven failure not just once, but many times over.

Because socialism is bad.

What sort of upbringing does it take to be bitten by the "socialism bug", as it were?

Nice meme.

>he thinks the history of capitalism is a success story

>outtie vs innie.jpg

Socialist state and road to achieve true communism its either morph into some other capitalims or end up total failure. Its good exuse to pull No True Scotsman even if it was communist who enforce state capitalism.

>Socialism means no private property
Jesus Christ, you can't even get your own retarded terms right. Socialism is the one with seized means if production. Communism is the one with no private property

Is this the brain damage of a socialist?

DELETE THIS! I get depressed every time I see the Aral Sea.

Everything you say is super relative and based on your personal definitions.

And you want to have a non "kill commies" discussion about socialism? Honestly though, defines "successes" because most states that have come close to socialism have had some pretty epic millions-of-people-dead failures and your go to was "cuba's medical care".

Cuba's medical care.

Clickbait

>implying BLM isn't a terrorist organization

Yes almost like a nationalistic variant on the otherwise internationalist bent of communist style socialism.

>most states that have come close to socialism have had some pretty epic millions-of-people-dead failures
The only cases I can remember off the top of my head where Marxism-Leninism or some form of socialism killed millions are Mao's China, the Soviet Union, or Ethiopia from 1974-87.
>only go to is Cuba's medical care
Au contraire. Ask a Marxist-Leninist what their ideology has accomplished, and they'll mention large scale and rapid economic development, the virtual elimination of unemployment, and noticeably increases in living standards, life expectancy, literacy, and other critical indicators. Ask a less authoritarian Marxist-Leninist what their ideology has done, and they'll mention rapid increases in living standards and critical indicators, the extension of true democracy and defeat of imperialism, and defeat of regimes that had horrible human rights records.

What the fuck is this board? OP spouts blatant communist lies about 'Cuban medical care' and everybody just goes with it. Who cares about facts, let's discuss philosophical matters with a guy who believes propaganda!

Friendly reminder that Cuba has cholera epidemic every year and their brilliant doctors killed Hugo fucking Chavez.

>defeat of regimes that had horrible human rights records.
Kek.

>ITT: Heroes of the People

A man whose love for his people was only matched by the peoples love for him.

RIP

source?