about time someone broke it to ya.
Tell me about Zen
here, give this a lash if you're interested, it's a great read: terebess.hu
Another time a superficial judgment that is not related to any buddhist teaching but only upon your precooked ideas.
That's really disappointing from a grand master
I understand that English is not your native language from your shaky grasp of its grammar, and your poor reading comprehension does you no credit either. But that's ok.
What is not ok is tis kind of trolling, since you are now arguing for now arguing against varying interpretations of what Zen and the Zen school actually mean. In other words, if you are not a troll, you are certainly acting in bad faith, and from the very beginning.
You understand very well I make no claims, and am merely pointing out the very obvious. (Video, texts, Humphreys himself etc).
You, on the other hand, are content to repeat your little contradictions sarcastically and in bad English to boot. I think we've run the course here.
Exactly as I wrote in my first post zen sect is full of arrogance peoples and any word you wrote is full only of your ego. I'm very interestes (not as you) to know what Zen school actually mean...but buddhist sects are not a pair of shoses that will change in according to fashion.
I'm sorry my english level is not comparable to speaking with you.
Chan practitioner for 13 years ask me something
Zenfags go back to >>>/zenith/
please quote me where I claim to belong to the Zen/Chan school, and post an example of my arrogance, thank you.
Let us return to the subject of this thread, and not to your imaginary ramblings.
If you are not a troll, you are a particularly misguided character, and I do not mean that on account of your linguistic expression or choice of sect, but on account of the cavalier fashion in which you barge in without understanding what it you are criticising.
Lineage?