Where does Veeky Forums fall on the Kinsey Scale?

Where does Veeky Forums fall on the Kinsey Scale?

The fact that some faggot made this to justify his faggotry is amusing

everyone's a little queer

maybe if you're a fucking repressed faggot

All these "inclusive" fags only draw the men with great bodies. Where are the fat, ugly men? Just more fat shaming from the left.

like yourself?

ppl sound so dumb when they seperate others by political stances
>le from the left, right le liberal le republican lelelele

not everyone fits into a neat lil box dumbo

Wanna be all "no homo" 0, but probably 1. I can usually tell when a man is attractive and can imagine some pretty dude fucking some equally hot chick, but I wouldn't fuck one.

So you're telling me someone who complains about "fat shamming" is NOT likely to complain about gays being oppressed?

All the way to the left, I only like men.

2

can i tap ya booty desu? srs

I applaud gay men for having some fucking standards.

I'm probably a 1 or 2 on this scale. Not really sure, honestly. I'd be pretty versatile with a super feminine convincing trap. I could conceive being dominant with a twink. Not really interested in having anything to do with anyone more masculine than that.

maybe a 1? i have no interest in sleeping with a man but i can acknowledge when one is hot

Probably 1, I just like traps.

Also, why do the guys get progressively naked?

the kinsey scale is usually used to imply that most people are somewhat fag, because there are more varieties of fag than there are varieties of not-fag. a false equivalence

the reality is that of the 10-20% of people who do fag things, a bunch of them have non-gay sex as well.

there's no way of measuring where someone stands on the kinsey scale, therefore it's not actually a scale

Even cultural marxism can't make ugly men be considered pretty

Probably somewhere between 1 and 2
I fap to all kinds of musclebound furshit but actual men aren't attractive to me.

>IU

Nothing else need be said

So you're a 6?

It's quite clear, and in no way implies equivalence. Think of it like an IQ graph where 105 and below is zero and 150+ is six

That's just me spit-balling, by the way.

Maybe tomorrow, I had a rage fap session yesterday and it's still hurting right now.

0.
There's a difference between having the aesthetic sense of recognizing and quantifying male beauty and finding men attractive.

I can easily tell whether someone has a harmonizing, pleasant facial structure or not, or whether it trends masculine (i.e. attractive to women) or not, but it's a clinical view, I can safely say there is nothing there.

I'm curious, Trappy. Top, bottom, or versatile?

same here. i consider it a 0.5

1, given enough feminine traits I could see myself being attracted to someone despite a dick.

Obviously a slutty bottom but I bet he'd be shy irl

Bottom.

Probably a 2.

The really weird thing is that he was also a goy, but of course he was building on turbo-kike and ur-degenerate Reich's work.

1 t b h you have to be a slutboi sometimes

I had a feeling

low 2

Another chunky dunky tripfag comes in to shit up a somewhat useless thread, what a surprise

0

Anyone who is 1 or 2 has been brainwashed by the kikes and trap thread shitposting. 3+ and you are just gay.

I'm a 3 t b h
I've made out with dudes before and it was fun but I prefer women. Maybe if I ever fuck a dude that'll change, who knows.

2 but sometimes i go in heat and turn into a 666

Half and half would consider me male or female with a few undecideds thrown in, but I deeeefinitely find manly men the most attractive by a wide margin. I do diddle to manly futa though sometimes. Is that gay? I have no idea desu.

Why don't you go fuck one then

0.25

Can't she be a little straight?

We all know the answer to that question.

1.5
i would probably move up to a 2 or a 2.5 if i found a cute boy to experiment with

Not everyone fagot, that's like saying no one is gay.

Definitely a 5, probably a 6.

The weird thing I've noticed about this graphic is the gayer it gets, the less clothes there is. I never saw a connection there.

I'm a 0. no bs.

6.5

2 i like to make gay make look at me and i look at other dudes but i'd never fuck a dude you know what i am saying

>number 2 manages to outgay his exclusively homosexual peers

2. I like being a cock tease for homos, but I don't like men

people overuse the term projecting on Veeky Forums and on Veeky Forums in particular, since it's one of the dumber boards, but this is a really beautiful instance of projection.
you sound like you're gritting your teeth and tears are welling up in your eyes at the thought that some people can live the way the way they feel they should without forfeiting their sense of belonging

Maybe a 2. I'm honestly not attracted to guys IRL at all, especially romantically, but I almost exclusively fap to guys on the internet. It's very strange. I couldn't imagine actually hooking up with a dude because I am not into cocks or anal at ALL, but a nice body? A good face? Cool hair? I can fap to that.

I feel like Veeky Forums has done this to me.

>I'm using this word that I think dumb people use, but don't judge me as being dumb like the rest of you guys, because I'm not, I swear.

def a 5

never took the test but it's kinda obvious

hm i take that back maybe a 4.5, but closer to 5 as most of the encounters i've had with the opposite sex have been drunken people-pleasing endeavors but i can still be attracted, it's just very rare and can never have the same depth of feelings as with the same sex

a 2 on the kinsey scale is 'I fuck guys for fun, but less often than I fuck girls', not 'I don't like men'.

You pretty much have to be 2+ to do gay4pay on a consistant basis.

a solid 2 desu

You're a huge faggot

>gay men
>standards
This is a straight person meme. It is literally the opposite. A homo will fuck anybody. The tops will fuck anybody who's looking for cock and bottoms will get fucked by anybody who puts in the effort to get their ass.

As an attractive vers, I can tell you from experience that getting laid top or bottom only takes a couple hours anywhere I am.

Just come out the closet. The water temperature is perfect

I've fooled around, just it's not my preference given the choice

this 2bh

thats gross. i guess im kinda bisexual cause once in a blue moon i fap to shaved twinks getting fucked, i like trap porn too but im picky and also straight porn, i never check guys out IRL cause the idea of actually sticking my dick in another guys ass grosses me out but the porn is a turnon, maybe cause taboo idk idc

I was like that too before I got drink and fucked a twink. I'm bisexual, too, but as soon as I got some man ass, I realized how stupid it is for me to go after women. They are twice the work for half the fun (you can only top women)

Just fuck a twink. They don't have to be too sexy, just a decent twink. You won't regret doing it, you'll only regret not knowing.

The picture is missing traps etc

>he doesn't realise that after a short period of time shitposting on Veeky Forums it's possible to throw out abuse without a second thought

you sound triggered, queer

nah i dont think were that similar, i have high standards, with women its not as bad but with dudes in the porn, seeing their face is a turn off, their presence is a turn off in person, i can only be POV twinks with shaved everything. it honestly weirds me out. im open to the experience but it doesnt seem likely atm. who knows, but the smell and reality of anal is gross, plus gay dudes are such sluts and its too risky. id only ever wanna go raw

Kinsey was a communist pedophile crypto-jew trying to make sexual deviancy seem normal

It seems the gayer one gets, the more flaming..

Sexuality is not a spectrum

Kinsey scale has been debunked, it's bullshit

I'm essentially a faggot but I fap to straight porn every few days

It's funny how 1 is actually the only one with awkward body language and embarrassed facial expression

I'm a 5 btw

>tripfag
>complaining about faggotry
nice one

>Veeky Forums in particular, since it's one of the dumber boards
I beg to differ, I've seen more academic discussions on Veeky Forums than on any board (on Veeky Forums and off Veeky Forums). Debates ranging from IQ & race correlation (with a bunch of papers and monographies cited) to strength conditioning (bunch of papers as well); from cancer to basic biology.
Cite me a "cleverer" board (Veeky Forums,Veeky Forums and Veeky Forums need not to apply, it's like reddit for retarded high schoolers)

nice try

>Debates ranging from IQ & race correlation (with a bunch of papers and monographies cited) to strength conditioning (bunch of papers as well); from cancer to basic biology.

woah :)

3.5 at the moment, but I can vary from 2 to 4 so I'll say 3 overall

3-4 ish

number 2 is gayer than all the rest m8

also nice trick to make heteros think they're part fag faggots

I'm correct, fagtron. Try all you want to justify your homolust, Kinsey scale is and always will be bullshit. Even the idea of something as obviously binary as sexuality actually being a "spectrum" is laughable.

Gayfag here.

This is 100000000000% not true.

I dont fuck fatties or hairy shitskins, or people with ugly faces.

This has held true even when shitfaced drunk.

5

I only ever look at dudes

But I do watch straight porn so I think that makes me a 5. Also I like when the dude is grabbing her tits and shit. I'm still only looking at the guy but idk, 5 seems right

T. A repressed faggot trying to feel straight even though has has ejaculated to homosexual desires


If it gives you a boner, you like it.
Everything else is delusion.

Spoiler: you could totally get boners from both sexes, whether you claim to be gay or straight

I know an ugly homosexual man and he has said this as well. Apparently it is sodom and gomorrah if you make the cut looks wise, but if you don't you get nothing

Project all you want, Kinsey scale is still false and sexuality is still binary.

>muh projection.

Kinsey scale is bullshit, didnt you read what i read?

The most staunch "exclusive" homosexual can get boners from women.

The most staunch, repressed heterofag can get boners from men.

If it gives you a boner you like it.
Everything else is delusion and cultural indoctrination

If you are wearing a blindfold receiving a blowjob, you will orgasm regardless of whether the persom fellating you has a Y chromosome or not

If you get an erection from sleeping does that mean you're sexually attracted to sleeping

Nah it means you were dreaming about sucking my dick

>6 looks like Trudeau

Kek

Do you get erections from being wrong all the time. Are you sexually attracted to being an idiot and not grasping basic logic

Sexuality has nothing to do with involuntary physiological reactions. The whole point of sexuality is what traits you seek out in a sexual partner, including male/female. Each person individually decides what traits they are sexually attracted to.

The 'most staunch "exclusive"' homosexual will not seek out female traits.

The 'most staunch, repressed (max projection) heterofag' will not seek out men to achieve an erection.

If it gives you a boner you are a functioning human being with a functioning penis, which means nothing in regards to whether you are attracted to men or women.

>If you are wearing a blindfold receiving a blowjob, you will orgasm regardless of whether the persom fellating you has a Y chromosome or not
And this helps your point how?

I agree somewhat, that it doesn't represent prevalence in any way.

But it doesn't mean the scale doesn't have some use.

FOOKIN RECT SCRUBBER!11!!!!!

>being this buttmad over the realization cocks are delicious

Just because you dont seek it out doesnt mean you arent sexually attracted to it.

Also most homofags seek out super feminine men

Heterosexual white male, college educated, 95k/year after taxes (not merrican)

I'd fuck anything with a hole - as long as it's not criminally relevant

I've been fucked in the ass as well, and I pretty enjoyed it. The fact is that the g-spot for men is down there. I'd recommend anyone to try a prostate orgasm at least once in their life.

I've standards. First of all, hygiene standards. There has to be respect for each other - or "others" if gangbang - and there has to be some level of intimacy. Nothing extremely deep, but it shall not be just a bunch of carcasses hitting on each other.

There have been studies (I don't have the time to link the papers right now, but it was discussed in a prior thread) showing how females are usually "omnivorous" but with less sex drive, while males are usually more "picky" (straight or homo) but with more sex drive. For example: it's considered more socially acceptable for a woman to have some lesbian past than for a man to have had some fuckbuddy; still men think about sex a lot more than women.

Personally, I'm probably omnivorous as much as women; and I've the typical male sex drive. I still identify as hetero since I prefer women as mating partners and I never found a male's body attractive - except for Matt Bomer. Who isn't a gay faggot for Matt Bomer?

Before Veeky Forums 0
After Veeky Forums 2

Number 1 after my summer cut.

I can admit that klokov has a great body whitout minor jealous resentment, but i don't enjoy the thought of doing anything sexualy with him.
And when i look at the picture; i do not like sweaters but i also do not enjoy wearing a tank top, so i guess i'm somewhere bewteen 0 and 1.

This desu senpai. Veeky Forums made me slide from a 0 or 1 to a 2 or 3. No homo.