Facial aesthetics thread

7/10 she looks too asian
she'd be 8/10 if she was whiter

She looks more hispanic than asian, desu.

Harsh!

She's not bad!

8, maybe 8.5

6.5/10

let's see your face OP

Theres no arguing whether she is hot or not

That's not a 6/10. At least a 7 or a 7.5.

a solid 6

Is a 6/10 average or still above average?

Attractiveness is more subjective in girls then it is in men, there's a very strict criteria to be an attractive man

a 6/10 is not gonna be different if ur a girl or a guy. It's a rating.

Not really I'd say it's the opposite.

A 6/10 to you might be a 10/10 to some one else user, shock wow ik

I think she's an 8

>wat is a ten look alike

Is a 6/10 rating for a GIRL average?

Uh no. A 5/10 rating is average. For anybody. Duh.

6/10 is above average but not as above average as an 8/10.

Hnnnnng, that little bit of arieola

more please

I put nothing special but still dateable at 7 which is the average standard for pretty.

Anything less than seven (5 or 6) may be possible with alcohol and makeup.

Anything less than 5 is a no go always and forever.

Very sophisticated outlook there user, I'd date as low as 3/10 if she had a good body atleast

In that photo she's a 7.5

But with make-up on and her hair styled correctly she'd easily be an 8.5.

7 is standard hot girl so I disagree that 7's aren't special.

Anything in the 7-10 range is special. Most girls, just like most guys, are extemely average looking or not hot. Like at all.

I think ppl underestimate how many average aka NOT hot ppl they see in everyday life vs hot ppl.

I live in Miami and I only 3-4 hot girls on a weekend when I go out. And I see hundreds of girls walking around or drinking or dancing on the weekends.

That's 4 hot chicks out of 100 bro.

Yeah 7's are pretty damn special!

>7.5

how do you arrive at such a specific number

Why do ppl care so much about looks? Is everyone auditioning to be the next male or female supermodel?

Autism. People who rate so specifically like that are autistic and probably not even aesthetic themselves.

Uh yeah 6.8, wait no 7, ehrr ok 7.5

Dumb as fuck.

> Looks asian
> Freckles
> Long hair

8/10
She would be 10/10 if she had a booty but judging by her tits, she seems to be skinny as fuck.

Yeah its fucking mind blowing isn't it

This is an aesthetic face. People will say "ew, gross" because she's a porn star.

But honestly it's an aesthetic fucking face.

>not posting based caprice

Date?! Like long term?
Why date a 3 when you could land a 7 with a little effort?

You must define 7 as much higher than me if you only saw 4 girls in the 7-10 range out of 100. 7's can be special to you. To me they're average level of attractiveness - thinking like North Face, Yoga Pants, Toms Shoes, and Netflix.

oh man shes looks so innocent. you would never guess she takes massives dicks to her face and cooter on a daily basis.

she kind of looks like a white version of my asian ex

The girl op posted is actually half Asian.

You can't tell?

Whatever you wish Sasha Grey was, she isn't

literally arguing a subjective opinion as objective fact and not being ironic.

do you realise how fucking arbitrary and meaningless your anecdote is.

you don't need to get so amped up over this shit.

I can but she's still whiter than my ex

How about a shitty chart thrown together by an autistic brwny? That ought to set things straight in no time.

No, but seriously, she's a fucking 9/10 which is basically a 10/10 to anyone who digs her type. I do, so to me she's a 10/10.

Edit: I meant "brony" as opposed to brwny. Kek.

I'm too influenced by the my little pwny meme.

matched with a girl on tinder who looks exactly like sasha grey. how to get in without revealing my intentions?

pic related. it's not just me right, she looks a lot like her?

veruca james

this desu

diminishes the role race and socialisation have on attractiveness, but yeah sure that picture works as a VERY rough guide.

This chart is bullshit. It basically says i've been with 7+ my whole life. The girls in the picture used for reference are gross bruh

Your chart is shit.
Everyone under 5 is in the bottom 10% aesthetically, almost all of them are outright repulsive and even a few up until you get to 9.

I don't know what the fuck is going on with your 8's bro, you need some fucking glasses.
Or don't, you'll probably be much happier with the lopsided whore that births your lopsided children.

>3/10 if she had a good body atleast
If a girl is 3, she doesn't have a good bady

I've often thought about making my own, as I did with the men's chart for /facial aesthetics general threads/. The problem is it just takes such a long time to find a pic for rows 6-8; the rest are pretty easy. Also, I try to be fair in terms of ethnicity rather than making the 8s and 9s all white.

The old men's chart looked like this (1/2)

>implying it's my chart after I explicitly stated its both not mine and somewhat retarded
>getting this butthurt

(2/2)

And my version of the men's chart looks like this. Note that it's very different from the /pol/ chart where all of the 9s have blue eyes, white skin and blond hair. If I ever have time to make a women's chart, I'll try to do about the same.

Not saying my chart is perfect either; people frequently object to Gosling being ranked so high. I agree he's not that great but women seem to dig him and I'm not sure who to replace him with.

yeah i've seen this one before and I'm not a huge fan considering multiple people are literal doppelgangers to each other but are in much higher or lower brackets.

take a look at everyone @ 5 or above.

now try find similar faces

pretty much why I don't think the 1 - 10 scale actually works.

especially since I can find women who are an objective 7/10 more attractive than a woman who is objectively a 10/10.

generally i view it like this:

it matters if you're ugly

it matters if you're extremely beautiful/handsome

everything in between is just shades of grey

a 6.5 can fuck a 9

this is at least consistent in the tiering

you see it progress from "average" to "above average" to "model" to "super model".

i'd say its more reliable as a rough gauge.

>generally i view it like this:
>it matters if you're ugly
>it matters if you're extremely beautiful/handsome
>everything in between is just shades of grey
>a 6.5 can fuck a 9
I definitely agree with all of the above.

6 or 6.5. Cute but spaghetti would still be at manageable levels. This is the perfect balance of attractiveness and approachability. At 7 spaghetti containment would be a conscious effort but still manageable. 8 and the spaghetti dam breaks. 9 is a spaghetticane, and 10 is Spaghettigeddon.

Note: the Spaghetti Scale is flawed, but it gives you a more meaningful and encouraging view of your progress when the scale slides.

fake freckles/10
>shit

Name ?

Bailey Jay

what the actual fuck most of the '4' guys are actually decently attractive. you're a fucking retard

Nobody asked about your ex. Move on cuck.

The descriptions are accurate for these things but it's undermined by the guy putting his subjective samples at each level which don't even appear to follow the descriptions. I've generally just ignored the sample faces and accepted just the descriptions.

not getting rused again, mister

I explicitly stated that the picture in that post is the old men's chart and that mine was in the next post. Maybe it's time to improve those reading comprehension skills.

Why are the twins from Dishonored in the "1" category?

The black guy look in 6 looks better than some of the people in 8.

>be mixed white/asian man
>go to bars and clubs
>mfw random bitches constantly fetishize me
>they introduce themselves
>still too autistic to pull

Rachel Cook. But only her face.

What post is this in response to?

I second it
post face