>sciencedaily
Really, fag?
Cutting/Bulking is bullshit
Adam Clark
Connor Jenkins
>It is for fat people
It's not.
>Prove it, faggot.
I have to prove to you that constantly decreasing and increasing the calories you consume, gaining and losing weight over and over again is bad for your health?
Yeah, just like this guy
youtube.com
You fucking dyel faggot.
Christian Phillips
>it's not
It is.
>you want me to prove the shit that I say?
Yes, I do. Prove it's unhealthy for you.
Leo Butler
>Sciencedaily isn't a reliable source that cites all of it's references
Are you autistic?
Nicholas Morales
Start lifting, that'll prove it.
Jeremiah Gray
>Journals do not have differing qualities of articles published
Are you?
Jordan Watson
This guy has been lifting for years and he's really tiny and relatively weak. Yeah he's lean and he's healthy, but come on...
Nathaniel Wilson
>medicinenet
>no sources
You are garbage at this?
Owen Collins
>Journals do not have differing qualities of articles published
What does that have to do with a cited/referenced research article from a university?
Leo Rodriguez
Prove that it's garbage and that I'm wrong.
I posted proof. Now you do.
You've clearly lost this debate.