How much easier it is for a, say 5'9-5'10 guy to reach aesthetic proportions and buff look in comparison with 6'1-6'3 guys?
Realistically speaking, do manlets really gain faster and look better without roids?
How much easier it is for a, say 5'9-5'10 guy to reach aesthetic proportions and buff look in comparison with 6'1-6'3 guys?
Realistically speaking, do manlets really gain faster and look better without roids?
Yes.
The question is how good can you really look at that short height? All the natty muscles in the world won't help you if you're shorter than a child.
5'10 isn't 5'4 or 5'2.
I am not talking about extremities here, so no child size and no 7 feet sticks either.
Let's say 5'8 to 6'3 height range.
Typical "manlet" and "lanklet".
5'10 is pretty good height tbqh
lanklet with extreme shitty genetics detected
stop whining faggot
they may look better on pictures, in person they look ridiculous
5'9 Manlet here yes it's really easy to build muscle but I think being shorter makes our muscles look bigger. I have 17 inch arms and I have a buddy with 17 at 6 foot and his arms look no where as good as mine
5'8 here
guy who taught me how to lift has 18 inchers at 6'4, i have 16
my biceps look bigger in proportion to my body than he does
aesthetics/mass are all about illusion
It's all proportions.
If two different men have the same body fat, same weight, different heights.
Either the manlet is jacked as shit or fat as fuck.
Either the lanklet is normal or lanklet.
It's not really that shorter guys build muscle faster, there's just less space to fill out so the same amount of muscle mass can achieve the desired proportions faster. Like said.