When did you realize squatting heavy is bad for aesthetics?

big legs look good but only when you have a well developed upper body aswell. Most SS diehards don't have the latter though. Work your upper body too and arms too, as much if not more than lower body.

Widen your waist, not your hips.

Hip width has nothing to do with assthedicks.

Waist size is everything.

External oblique hypertrophy = wider waist

>he fell for the arm isolation meme
Just keep training back, delts, and chest.

keep telling yourself that looks good, friend. the rest of the gym is laughing at you

My arms are bigger than yours, though.

My delt:arm ratio is bad even without having trained arms ever.

If i had trained arms my delt:arm ratio would be even worse, and i would end up looking like this clown
It is literally impossible to have a well developed back and no biceps
Similarly it is impossible to have nice delts and pecs without tricep.

100% of dyels complaining about lagging arms have a lagging back, lagging delts, and a lagging chest

Now post your delt:arm ratio

So should I stop increasing the weight on squat if I don't want to look like shit? I'm very close to 2 x bw for reps on back squat, slightly less than that on front squats.

I recommend subbing out squat for hip thrusts.

Still can work the legs and glutes, without growing the obliques.

That + stomach vacuums (do them religiously as you would brush your teeth or shower)

nice arms big guy

pressing that arm on your body so hard lmao killyourself
torso dominant bodies exist and its fucking horrible
I'm currently benching 90 kilos with 12inch spaghetti arms ffs

...

Not really.
Better than yours though, dyel.

Also pic was taken as i typed post so completely flat and depleted, no pump work, mediocre lighting and meh posing.

It is only there to display my horrendous delt:arm ratio.

Could you imagine how much more unaesthetic i would be if i trained arms and had an even WORSE delt:arm ratio?

Now post your delt:arm ratio, you dyel

Literally an aesthetics killer

...

>Hip width has nothing to do with assthedicks.
>Waist size is everything.

You look like shit dude, why even post that picture ? lmao

nigga your arms are pathetic

why don't you hop on clen and kys instead big guy

>My arms are bigger than yours, though

>Has no arms himself

Laffing at ur life lad

Arm literally wasnt touching body, and i just went into the mirror and arm size doesnt even change when I squeeze it to my body.

Flexed muscle isnt squishy bro. I think squeezing arms against body only works for fatceps

See if this kid trained back, he would probably have arms.

As it stands he apparently has neither

when did you realize squatting 4 times a week gives you the power to thrust like an indian god

Yea, because more than .000001% of the population totally looks like that

yeah can relate ;_;
lmao retard

>this guy actually thinks he looks good

d e l u s i o n

To show how bad my delt:arm ratio is even without ever training arms.

I felt I clarified this explicitly

dude, you never tried anything

why are you even on this board?

>doesnt post his dyel arms as a response
Its ok, deltlet

You people are pathetic.

doesn't matter what you said is still wrong for a V-taper you need long clavicles and small hips

>you would have biceps if you trained back instead of biceps
just how retarded are you ?
do you have no logic whatsoever?
I KNOW
me
me
me
not me

No i dont

I think
-you look worse
-my delt:arm ratio is shit, and i dont train arms

Focus on reading comprehension

pic unrelated. He might look good to you guys, but aesthetically speaking hes way unbalanced.

Nah, just ohp and stomah vacuums and lat mass

Keep telling yourself anyone on this board look worse than you.

You ccannot train back without training bicep, genius

>hurr how do i compound movement?

*whisper*"stop trying he's a retard'

>doesnt post self
Damage control harder, m8

Wow this thread is pathetic. Some insecure cunts in here.

When I became unable to fit my tree trunk thighs into pants that weren't loose as shit on my waist and rest of legs. Briefly contemplated spending $90 on rogue jeans, til I came to the realization if I lost just a bit of mass it would make my upper body look even better.

>might look good to you, but to someone such as myself he's way unbalanced

LOL post physique idiot

What? I didn't do any damage? What's there to control? Holy shit. Not only do you look like shit but you're also fucking retarded.

>46 replies
>17 posters
I would hesitate to pluralize the word cunt

That disgusting fur patch sure is

>all this damage control
Its ok to be called out as a dyel, you dyel.

You are anonymous anyways.

>i t-totally look better
>i-i just forgot my camera is all
>p-please believe i am not dyel
>t-this laughing reaction image will save me

It is ok to have smaller arms than a man who doesnt train arms, user

holy fuck how can someone be this stupid ?!!
here's a magical set of words for your thick retarded skull;
I S O L A T I O N T O T A R G E T A N D A C H İ E VE M O R E H Y P E R T R OP H Y I N A C E R T A I N M U S L C E G R O U P

if you wanna jack off so much to a strangers arm then fine, here you go

Right. Getting growth in your arms and not your delts/pecs/back is what fucks up your proportions and results in a shitty delt:arm ratio.

Literally the crux of everything i have said

>post picture
>gets called out for looking like shit
>b-b-but you look like shit too
>d-d-damage control

Arguing with you, is like arguing with a radical tumblr feminist.

PS: my dick is fucking bigger than your pathetic arms bye

Lmao i knew you were small af.

Your delt:arm ratio isnt as horrible as i thought, but it is really bad

Not me, but you're just as pathetic as the first guy.

fite me faget

Picture wasnt "holy shit i am so jacked look at me"

I never said I didn't look like shit
I said
-you look worse
-my horrendous delt:arm ratio is evidence to arm isolations being unaesthetic

>arguing
you call shitposting about how some random dude is small and refusing to post pic to prove you're not an even more pathetically dyel faggot is a way of arguing? did your mom drop you on your head?

I am totally down, where you at?

are you bird brained or something? you were just arguing about how I could put on more arm size if I'd hit chest and back and not target bicep and tri's directly
and now you're saying what I said works better on putting in arm size and it fuck up proportions?
is there a limit to your stupidity? FUCKING google torso/limb dominant genetics and see how different things work different on different people

in ur mums bed

got eem

I lift entirely for aesthetic purposes. I want to look and feel good.

Do I have to squat and deadlift for "muh strength base"? Can't I just leg press for tons of reps?

You misinterpreted what i said.

I said if you had mass on your back, you would have mass on your arm.

You have small arms because you have a small back, and small delts, and small pecs.

Rather than trying to grow arms as fast as possible and fucking up your proportions...

Focus on actially growing a back, and the bicep mass will come.

Better yet it will be proportional.

You understand now?

if you're lifting ENTIRELY for aesthetics then stick to machines and do 3x12-15 reps on a split. people will shitpost about muscular imbalances and low stability and blah blah blah but if you don't care about being an athlete and just want to look good then sure go knock yourself out

Post body, dyel.

This is horrendous advice
m.youtube.com/watch?v=xTDapcklnV8

stop being such a try hard smartass

you're not clever for pointing out pendantic semantic """errors"

>Arguing on Veeky Forums

>calling this an argument
Wew lad.

I am just shitposting, m8

Wasn't even me. Thread is recognizing you as a fagtard

where'd you get those shorts tho fampai
mirin' legs

If this was not you. Why the fuck would you respond to a reply that wasn't directed at you. Are you fucking dense?

>explain the behavior of this poster who is not you
Uh... Maybe he thought you were a faggot and wanted to say something?

Just an assumption

which part of torso dominant did you not understand ? my back and chest responds to training so good while my arms respond like my ex
my back is not small why are you saying it's small?
I row like 70 pounds with one arm and I'm 5'8

>explain the behavior of this poster who is not you

How are you this fucking dense? I asked you to explain YOUR reply to post that apparently wasn't directed at you. I'm done, you're too fucking stupid.

I have yet to see such a genetic anomaly, though MANY MANY claim to have lagging arms

It has been my experience that precisely 100% of these people have
-no back
-no delts

And approximately 65% have
-no pecs

Excepting maybe someone who is satisfied with tricep mass but not bicep (a sure sign of an underdeveloped back, but they might have nice pecs and delts

Until i see pictorial evidence of someone with well developed back and delts, who doesnt have proportional arm mass, i will remain skeptical

Your argument sounds to me like
>some people are just genetically fatter, i simply can't lose weight!!

As you might imagine, i am underplaying my skepticism quite a bit.

dumbbell rows, dumbass

Post delt:arm ratio and chin up strength

what is going on here i dont understand

holyfuck youre so ignorant it hurts
fucking google slow/fast twitch muscle fibers you inexperienced mongrel
some people cant grow calves BECAUSE their genetics gave their calves sllow twitch muscle fibers,same goes for arnolds legs
slow twitch muscle fibers can never get as much of a good pump or fiber activation (which leads to a lot less hypertrophy)as fast twitch muscle fibers
my back and chest has mostly fast twitch while my bi's and tri's have slow twitch
some mongolids like you might have different fiber's too
fucking read uneducated faggot

>5'8"

OP here, this is my only post ITT.
>82 replies, 23 IPs

Don't misunderstand folks, squats are probably the best bodybuilding exercise, but squatting HEAVY and for HYPERTROPHY (10+ reps, many sets) is gonna give you some big bulky ass legs, which are gonna be aesthetic only on a certain type of body (some sort of lean bear mode). On most people it's not gonna look good, so if you are going for aesthetics don't do it, unless you can pull the lean bear mode off.

This is 100% true. I find it more effective to do squats with 50lbs 200X three days a week. Gets me lean and tight where as squatting 470lbs was just making my waist blow out!!!FACT!!!

Are you a meme?

lululemon might sell those
just look for track pant like material and the fit is close to show ass and legs

Can anyone confirm this?

>IS OLA TIONTOTAR GET AND ACHİEVE MORE HYPER TROP HYINA CERTAIN MUSLCE GROUP
?

Post pic

Cant judge if you have no work put in. Lets see that nice neet gut bb

> tfw you will never get a 2 minute scene in a movie that is purely about how wet women get from seeing your body

kangaroo bod

I squat 480 and I feel like I look just fine senpai.

working out is bad for aesthetics period. It's genetics. You either have it or you don't

what a disgusting narcissist
>faggy chin peach fuzz
>faggy panta
>faggy pose
>faggy skull cap
you might as well be screaming to the world that your ego is the size of the moon and you have no personality.

nice bait

>Before I even started.
>I think women like a juicy lower body but when you got a ass and thighs bigger than hers it's time to stop feeling appropriate.