Thoughts on jeff cavaliere?

Goal natty physique right there.

That being said, he gives great advice and is one of the best sources to listen to if you don't ever want to get injured.

Compensating old man. Who gives a fuck what you look like when you are a grandpa. Time to move over old fag.

>posting Candito
Nigga, you retarded? This is the body compound/strength training will get you once your lazy ass decides to cut.

Same kind of style as Scott Herman but inferior in every way.

6 months noob gains.

Not great but not bad for the timespan.

You only have to listen to the information provided by experts (dr. Mike israetel, dr. Eric helms, dr. Brad schoenfeld, idk if menno henselmans has a doctorate, but his published literature is great, same for lyle mcdonald) to know that jeff's information is lackluster.

My shitty noob physique does nothing to add or detract from the quality of information presented.

yeah, he looks shit in comparison. you fucking idiot

post your pic user, let us all see how ripped you are

you look sort of short. but still solid gains m8
focus on delts and chest

Jeff why you mad?
P.s. Not that guy but scott totally has a better body

>autism

Delts, upper chest and lats are pretty much all i give a shit about at this point.

That and keeping up my weight loss (former obese)

That's the spirit brah carry on

generally good advice, ignore any shill attempts though, guy has to make money too.

shoo shoo dyel noob

I said my physique was shitty.
Might i see yours after ~6 months noob gains??

Might i also hear a valid criticism of the works of eric helms and mike israetel? Or the research of schoenfeld?

Sickcunt
Sadcunt

WWZD?

>eric helms and mike israetel
idk who these fags are. all i see is another dyel spewing shit like he knows something

He look like that an asshole step father who will fuck your mom loud enough for you to hear it and make fun of you infant of your friends.

I hate the guy

well your channel does get over a million hits per video

wait a moment, what fucking channel? you fat, dyle cunt

carry on lifting for girls you cuck

natty limit desu

>doesnt know who literal fitness legenda are
>thinks he can speak as though he knows even a small iota of fitness
Post your current physique.

I bet my noobgains trump your entirety of gains.

Do yourself a favor and go read some relevant literature. Maybe listen to a couple relevant lectures

Once again my physique does not add or detract from the quality of advice presented by top experts in relevant fields

>mainstream popularity determines value, self-worth, and quality of information
Kek

I guess lady gaga is better and smarter than stephen hawking

5x5 is better for strength. You can't argue otherwise.

Is Jeff Cavaliere posting ITT? Fucking kek.

you absolutely should approach your MRV at 3 sets, or the load is insufficient.
But i don't see the relevance to this thread.

Are you ok user? You wanna talk about it?

yeah i was wondering the same thing.

i like the guy generally, but whoever this samefag is needs a dose of reality. just because someone doesnt look as good doesnt mean the guy is above reproach. fucking millenials have no idea how to into logic and just blindly follow shit. explains a lot about Veeky Forums actually

What are you talking about?

parttimecoach.co.uk/wordpress/mrv-youre-probably-training-too-much/

MRV has to do with volume, not merely sets. 5x5 = more volume = better gains, according to a dozen different studies. Someone working 5x5 and using lighter weight in the last 2 sets, hypothetically, to compensate for fatigue will have still achieved a much higher volume than the guy doing 3x5. If you think MRV is an issue here, then you're suggesting that a proven scheme like 5x5 is "too much volume." Please.

Training volume is setsxrepsxload, ya dingus

If setsxreps is insufficient, increase load