I mean, look at ETH, NEO etc. Sure they're built on creating ICO's, but LINK is built on Oracles. Oracles are rewarded with LINK. In 5 years time, when airports are using Oracles for weather data, when insurance companies are using Oracles for speed readings, when police are using Oracles for forensic application, when cyber security applications are using Oracles for public key encryption, when applications are using Oracles for authentication, when cloud hosting providers are using Oracles for traffic analysis, when retail firms are using Oracles for validating their till balances, when audit firms are using Oracles for invoice validation, when manufacturing firms are using Oracles for product quality control, when freight companies are using Oracles for logistics handling, when GPS providers / Google Earth are using Oracles for positioning data, when global advertising conglomerates are using Oracles for audience demographics, when companies are using Oracles for directorship votes, when banking conglomerates are using Oracles for transaction assurance, when oil titans are using Oracles for contract assurance, when nation states are using Oracles for census data, when governments are using Oracles for voting polls, when armies are using Oracles for command and control verification, when the UN is using Oracles for voting for permanent 5 members, and when Oracles are using Oracles for veracity; does LINK at $100 sound reasonable? If not, does it sound more reasonable than LINK at $2?
What are your thoughts.
Christian Carter
It will. Will take time
XLM might too. But XRP won't. Look at the market cap.
Jeremiah Anderson
Lets say you collected 32millions$,
lets say you go on your website and click on team and there are only two teenagers in there CTO and CEO...
so they collected 32millions$ but cant hire talents to support the growth of the company and cant communicate about it. 32 FUKIN MILLIONS.
30% of the tokens are for them and their advisors.
THEY CAN DUMP ANYTIME;
TOTAL SCAM RETARDS. JUST INVEST IN OMG
Sebastian Green
>Seriously... why could this coin It's not a coin
Easton Davis
It's all vaporware, get out now.
Samuel Gray
Omg? HAHAHHA
Jaxson Wright
>Seriously... why could this coin NOT reach $100?
Because there's 1 BILLION in circulation. Do some simple arithmetic.
Easton Bennett
a million dollar company that operates in one of the top emerging country on earth and on the number 1 crypto country on earth with products and existing customers and a team of talents and devs?
YEAH ill definitly put money in this rather than chainlink scam noob
Parker Gomez
>1 BILLION in circulation We've been through this several times already, Pajeet.
Nathan James
Did you just missed what happend?
Link will never rech $0.60
Easton Torres
Will I make it with 400
Xavier Allen
I BOUGHT THE FUCKING TOP WTFFFFF PLEASE TELL ME IM GOING TO MAKE IT FUUUUU
Wyatt Bell
We are witnessing the Great Shakeout of non believers, 10,500 satoshis by eod
Cooper Ross
moon
Bentley Wright
10k by 2019
Cameron Martin
$50,000 per LINK by Q1 2018
it will absorb MasterCard and Visa's marketcaps
Lincoln Ross
The price of gold will never increase, just look at its market cap.
^^That's you. That's what you sound like.
Nathan Watson
sure. you wont even have a decent wallet by Q1 noob
Austin King
> tfw you saw the enormous pump but couldn't cash out because the library wifi didnt work for my laptop Ah... Guess I'll be holding these bags now
Jaxson Harris
please explain to us why they needed to raise 32 MILLIONS$ and what they intent to do with it.
If you invested in this shitcoin and cant answer this question you a retard
Kevin Martinez
Whale manipulation
Easton Diaz
This. It will shoot up to $5
Jose Scott
>you wont even have a decent wallet by Q1 noob These are the people that FUD LINK.
Lucas Hughes
did you check your shitcoin roadmap? oh sorry you dont even have ONE LOOOOOOOL even shit obsidian has one
Caleb Wood
>what they intend to do with it Hire developers, hire business development officers, hire marketing staff, outsource marketing services, buy an office space, pay for legal services, hire general managers to run the business whilst they focus on business development, add reputation value, pay for their time to do so and provide an amount of cash sufficient to keep a business alive for years to come
Does that answer your question?
Jordan Smith
>velopers, hire business development officers, hire marketing staff, outsource marketing services, buy an office space, pay for legal services, hire general managers to run the business whilst they focus on business development, add reputation value, pay for their time to do so and provide an amount of cash sufficient to keep a business alive for years to come >Does that answer your question? >[Post a Reply][Return] [Catalog] [Top] 24 / 2 / 18 / 1 [Update] [Auto]
ok so based on their inexistant whitepaper you bet that in ten years they will release something that might solve a problem and not dump all their coins to get short term profit?
Id rather go gamble color in a casino
Joshua Johnson
Roadmaps are for incomplete projects.
Juan Baker
>inexistent whitepaper
Stopped reading there. I've read every word of the whitepaper. Don't fucking invest, find the nearest doorknob and attempt to swallow it you fucking absolute walnut.
Easton Howard
>their inexistant whitepaper That meme is from a few months ago, friend. You have to stay up to date if you want to FUD.
Eli Robinson
>few months ago, friend. You have to stay up to d go look at a real wallpaper and compare it to your 2page gay paper done in 2hours
Matthew Cooper
who the fuck needs a dedicated wallet,jesus. you faggots need a specially tailored faggot suit for every one of your little faggot coins. Just store it in metamask.
Jackson Flores
it's around 36 pages
Samuel Anderson
peer reviewed boyo
Nathan Hall
how would they dump million of coins without crashing the market? do you even math bro
Nathan Flores
It's literally the best whitepaper I've read in this shitcoin market
Caleb Barnes
They will ise the tech sithout oayingthe price Why do you thinm any kf those scenarios would want to pay everytime they need "an oracle"
Let's do this: If any of you can explain to me what the "oracle problem" is I'll buy 250k worth of link
Adrian Butler
To the whales keeping this down, I hope your children burn in a vicious fire.
Oliver Ward
larp
Hudson Wood
They are not doing it intentionally. They are just dumb and following emotions like most plebs here.
Carter Flores
>JUST INVEST IN OMG
holy shit, people still talk about that shitcoin? how's the road down to $6 treating you? By year end you'll have a lower marketcap than walton lmao
Jordan Green
>What is parity?
Nathaniel Rogers
So I finally got one of my primary concerns about LINK tokens cleared up. >What makes smartcontract.com not just make an independent oracle API and tokens for another blockchain if etherum should lose its position as the market leader? So we would be left bagholding worthless ERC20 LINK tokens while smartcontract.com still flourishes with the same concept and tech on a new platform. Pic related for answer, the Oracles will be able to communicate with other blockchains, who will be forced to swap into LINK tokens for the data.
Evan Martinez
Yes they are, and I sincerely hope nothing but pain and misery to their families.
Can't catch a fucking break ever with these parasites. Fuck them and their children. All the news is positive and they still hold it back.
Nolan Lewis
Why are they holding it back tho?
Brandon Kelly
buy back in at a cheaper price probably
Nicholas Morgan
They post on here sometimes and laugh at us. They're vermin.
James Parker
conference is starting now folks
Adrian Wilson
Time zones. It's been over for several hours.
Connor Turner
Do you enjoy trying to push 45 cents and seeing it go back down and go back up and go back down?
Thanks for your money.
Chase Rivera
oh shit
Jackson Powell
Keep building that negative karma asshole. You're going to get burned eventually.
Oliver Martin
What negative karma? This is a zero sum game, any gains you make will be off the back of some poor sod.
Adrian Ward
Depends when they got in. You are just holding back a moon for no fucking reason. Let it fly you piece of shit. We all stand to gain.
Daniel Price
I'll give you one reason, it would allow me to retire and it's not gonna fucking happen since I'm cursed into wagecucking till I die sorry I spoiled the Link potential for you guys
Joseph Ward
This, it also has the potential to fly higher than the shit 10 cent gains up and down
Alexander Miller
Seriously, ChainLink is bigger than everyone thinks, even still, even after SIBOS, the next big conference, you name it. Companies WANT to take advantage of smart contracts. They've been wanting this for years. Freaking out because there's no news from Sergey is ridiculous. He's doing EXACTLY what he needs to be doing right now: putting his product in front of companies that are interested in utilizing smart contracts. The average crypto-investor (that's us, like it or not) is not his targeted audience, and honestly, hyping up a coin would probably look shady to the companies that he is interested in bringing on-board to the ChainLink network. So don't expect a ton of news. Don't expect any hype from the team. But don't assume that's a bad thing, because in reality, it's going to help the long-term growth of ChainLink.
Zachary Evans
It makes me tons of money until someone tries to buy out what I am playing with, then I still have a massive stack and everyone wins.
Until then feeding on weak hands and having people buy at ATH is more profitable
Daniel Bailey
Higher range means more interest from other whales, which means the volatility will increase over time. You are only holding yourself back from making more on a wider range at higher levels. You wont make much from these weak hands and tiny volume.
Charles Cooper
Question: A success of LINK would also raise the value of ETH as only crypto to use to pay for contracts? Could a success of LINK also make eth raise above BTC?
Adrian Evans
> in the long term success of Link will boost the entire crypto market up. It's gonna cause the adoption that everyone is awaiting
Evan Jones
That is reassuring. Then again it's coming from a PR
Isaiah Howard
>Complexity, competition and adoption The code is simple as fuck, a team of 5 of google's less experienced programmers could learn blockchain and develop a better chainlink for less than 1% of link's marketcap. It's why the skele said it was overvalued in the first place, the idea is indeed great but the code is retardedly simple.
>There's no guarantee, before or after sibos, that ChainLink will be the best, cheapest option when the time does come for oracles to be useful
Fucking deluded linkies
Angel Hall
because its fucking garbage lol just look at how hard it tanked after your "conference", went from 9k to 6k yet people are happy about a dead cat bounce back to 7k, linkies are so sad holy shit i shed a tear for you sad fags
Lucas Nguyen
Why would anyone actually use Chainlink if it was so expensive?
Nathan Gray
I have 70 link, will I make it fellow goyim ?
Hunter Russell
because it won't be when you're paying node operators fractions of a LINK token fool
Luke Anderson
Finally somebody sane here. Also wtf do you believe big companies will actually buy your shitcoins for 100x instead of making their own? Are you unironically retarded, linklets?
Easton Richardson
>The price of gold will never increase
The price of gold isn't increasing despite the supply side tapering.
Luis Campbell
Because 18 decimals.
Easton Powell
What the fuck is happening is it going to 0 or moon
Wyatt Brown
...
Aiden Morris
Still no news on the presentation today? They need to hire a secretary or something. Must have gotten enough money for that from the ICO.
Joseph Thomas
Is it more likely people will be actually able to hold LINK for another 2 years, or will they dump it for the next flavor of the month?
Evan King
...
Nathan Reyes
My God you are retarded
Ayden Morales
NAH much closer to the moon few BIGGER Whales accumulate and we head for the alpha centauri 2-10$
Angel Peterson
>wtf do you believe big companies will actually buy your shitcoins for 100x instead of making their own? would you answer this please?
Juan Flores
Do NEO next.
Oliver Adams
Not for now
Logan Thompson
Do you even know what the purpose of an oracle is?
Jaxon Clark
18 decimal places, and also if they were to create their own decentralized oracle network they would still have to pay fees, thats how decentralized networks are incentivized. I swear most of you faggots on this board just got into crypto this summer
Robert Anderson
compare the use of DGB and Link mate
Brody Morris
your gonna need at least 5k to kinda of make it . but it's okay i only have a hundred shares so i know your pain
Caleb Nguyen
I know. I'm jelly with all the people who have 20k :/
Nicholas Foster
ETH will be pushed hard by its Dapp, it's a pendulum, right now it's dragged down but once you will begin to see the applications then the flippening willl happen.
Eli Morgan
they think Sergey has spent the last 3-4 years without figuring out the most basic principles, lmao at those retards thinking they jut outsmarted everyone
Colton Howard
so in short, us newbies who got into crypto trading not too long (a week) ago , have about a couple years to catch on to the whales before BTC is 9 - 10k, Eth is 2 - 3k, LTC is 500 - 1k, and is LINK is double what LTC is now.
am i in the ballpark with those guestimations?
Carson Jenkins
Yeah, but they can avoid buying it from you and create the private blockchain network within banks. And this is what they basically will do.
Samuel Wood
The absolute state of this board
Nathan Ramirez
>LTC is 500 - 1k
David Evans
Do you actually believe banks won't be able to set up oracles for themselves?
Joshua Ortiz
*by themselves
Luke Sullivan
They wont be buying LINK off node operators though will they? And if they have a private blockchain between banks, so what? In order for it to receive external data, they would need an oracle, which is why they want to use chain link. Jesus Christ. Read the fucking whitepaper
Brandon Cook
They are doing exactly this, but bankers aren't techies, so they are getting techies to do it for them, aka Sergey + Steve
Kayden White
Okay, now, before you shout MUH ORACLE one more time, think about this:
The Oracles send data from sources. These external sources are -often- institutions, such as SWIFT and Standard and Poors. There are other less-institutionalized examples of oracles, but I would expect that on a volume basis, the majority of the use of oracles are transmitting data from within financial institutions.
This isn't a situation like OMG where your fundamental customers are everyday people. This is a situation where the oracles are sending data from within an entity. Now, the transmission of the data and the execution of the transmission should be decentralized, great.
But why wouldn't a consortium of banks or financial reporting agencies simply decide to create their own oracle network rather than involve some kid?
These institutions are already facing looming obsolescence.
Why would they outsource the very reporting of the only thing that makes them relevant - some quasi-trust factor to deliver accurate financial information.
There's no reason these institutions wouldn't create an Oracle-Ripple and use it to maintain some relevance in the blockchain era.
The idea that some kid with some code is going to come in and throw a toll booth that 4channers own on top of SWIFT communication protocols is the greatest example of delusion I have seen on this board yet.
EYB (enjoy your bags)
Leo Collins
>muh they could just make their own oracle >muh supercomputes on each city
Hunter Anderson
the issue is the manipulation from having it just on Edelta and on Binnace. Just wait motherfuckers. Once more exchanges are adopted, this. shit. is. mooning. hard. its literally the only thing holding it back right now
Tyler Stewart
what are patents?
Zachary Turner
>But why wouldn't a consortium of banks or financial reporting agencies simply decide to create their own oracle network rather than involve some kid?
“Hey guys lets spend a bunch of time and money developing a cost savings solution that has already been developed”
Yeah that’ll go over well
Jaxson Jones
>there's an enormous value add of totally decentralizing the execution of data that comes from a centralized source anyway, so let's let some random kid render our communications obsolete instead of creating our own inter-institutional network a la Ripple where it's quasi centralized in some murky way but people largely don't care because they're relying on us for data anyway Do you even think about the mechanics of things you invest in