>Manlet (5'11)
>Klinefelter's syndrom
>Married his half-sister like a true Wyoming gentleman
>most famous pharaoh to reign in history
we.. we're gonna make it brahs
>Manlet (5'11)
>Klinefelter's syndrom
>Married his half-sister like a true Wyoming gentleman
>most famous pharaoh to reign in history
we.. we're gonna make it brahs
Other urls found in this thread:
the fuck is wrong with his left ankle
>5'4
>intersex
>poor
I'm not going to make it
He's only the most famous because his tomb was found undisturbed. He was by all accounts a very unremarkable Pharaoh.
club foot
you're by all account a very unremarkable person.
ruling over your mom's basement doesn't count
This.
All the other tombs in the valley of the kings were robbed by ancient Greeks and Romans thousands of years ago. Tuts grave was robbed in the 1900s by the British. That is the only reason why tut is relevant today.
wtf is intersex can you please define this shit for me
going full trap mode?
if he had klinefelters he wouldnt even be fertile bruh how did he have kids
>implying tutankhamun is more famous than Ramses II
He didn't. He died a child.
King Tut was a product of incest.
Hes only famous because we found his tomb intact. Grave robbers got to all the better pharoahs first so we didnt find many artifacts from them. The only reason anyone cares about him today is because he was so lame grave robbers didnt bother taking his shit
>5'11
>klinefelter
lost height lottery even when most of klinefelter's are lanklets
b-but king tut was a homie. he wuz blak and we wuz kangz.
What do you think the average height was in Egypt 1300 BC?
>even the foot of the ancient guy with klinefelter's syndrom was clubbing and you sit in your parents basement
No he never. he had 2 stillborn children with his half-sister
Speak for yourself you fucking loser
>Manlet (5'11)
That was tall for those times though. The average human male was about 5'6 back then.
>3300BC
Probably like 5'0"
...
Nah,
>Cro-Magnons were anatomically modern, straight limbed and tall compared to the contemporaneous Neanderthals. They are thought to have been 166 to 171 centimeters (about 5' 5" to 5' 7") tall.
So the Egyptians would have been the same. The only reason modern humans are taller is because we're have easy access to food, especiall meat and dairy.
lol, the Vikings were only 5'7" and that was just a thousand years ago.
The vikings were tall back then compared to the western and southern europeans.
Cro-Magnons were pre-Neolithic...
I think he's trying to say that since the cro-magnons were very early humans from which we descend from, its very unlikely the average human height would have been shorter than 5'5"