Are good proteins and bad proteins a myth?
Are good proteins and bad proteins a myth?
Other urls found in this thread:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
jama.jamanetwork.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
bmj.com
iarc.fr
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
bmj.com
press.endocrine.org
anabolicmen.com
chaosandpain.blogspot.com
saragottfriedmd.com
rawfoodsos.files.wordpress.com
deniseminger.com
deniseminger.com
foodrenegade.com
deniseminger.com
nel.gov
heart.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
hsph.harvard.edu
youtube.com
ajcn.nutrition.org
well.blogs.nytimes.com
coachmikeblogs.com
youtube.com
jn.nutrition.org
authoritynutrition.com
authoritynutrition.com
authoritynutrition.com
breakingmuscle.com
twitter.com
Left one is processed food with a shit ton of sodium and other chemical shit and only the meat has some Protein, the rest is Carbs and Fat.
Right one doesnt have the chems and has important Micro and Macronutrients the other one lacks.
The left one tastes way better though
Subjective.
Yes, but are there good proteins and bad proteins?
left one has beef which is around 70% bioavailable protein and high fat (~20%) compared to chicken. Fries are empty carbs, high fat. Not enough vegetables. Likely white bread for buns and sugar filled condiments in sauces.
Right has low fat chicken with quality protein (2% fat, 99% bioavailable). micro nutrients and fiber from veges. Only thing missing is a large portion of complex carbs (rice, beans, yams, oats, etc)
Protein is protein, but the plate on the left is only 30% protein while the plate on the right is 95% protein.
>Large portion of carbs
Nice meme faggo
left one has 3x more calories, 5x more carbs, all simple
good comparison.
You list all the macronutrients for the burger, and say there are more in the other dish???