How healthy is he?

How healthy is he?

Other urls found in this thread:

nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-doctor-wrote-health-letter-just-5-minutes-limo-waited-n638526
snopes.com/trey-gowdy-admitted-benghazi/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
youtube.com/watch?v=5GsXrZSyIj0
theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/29/benghazi-report-finds-no-smoking-gun-and-hillary-clinton-happy-to-move-on
nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0
foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/28/in-final-report-benghazi-committee-finds-no-new-evidence-of-clinton-wrongdoing/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Overweight and elderly don't mix but I'm sure he's on a mile long list of pills to keep him going. I'm sure he's on low dose test.

Hamplanet status

Secretly hoping he suffers a stroke in office tbqhwyf

One of those pills is an anti hair loss supplement, its side effects can include mental impairment and confusion

>he thinks that stuff is actually growing out of trump's head

girlslaughing.jpg

Think about it, we had fat ass Taft, and cripple Roosevelt, but the last one to die in office was that young pretty boy Kennedy.

Are you supposed to produce so much sweat it becomes reflective?

his official doctor said he was "only" slightly overweight at 267 pounds.

he has dementia and i wouldnt be surprised if he has a stroke or heart attack in office.

You can see the hairline
Its when you can't that its a wig
And the fact remains he is taking anti hair loss medication with dangerous side effects to cognitive function

>dementia
I used to think that too, except that hair loss medication is supposed to cause impairment in mental functions

Off yourself beta

>making fun of FDR

Well he does like to present himself as if he were the second coming of Reagan. Just minus the popularity and support. Might as well go the whole way.

not very

THICC

Damn, the president looks like THAT?!?

CHINA

Raygun wasn't popular except when invading and attacking countries

Reagan actually got impressive numbers in the electoral college though, absolutely curbstomping the dems in 1980. Trump barely scraped a victory together, even lost the popular vote and has the audacity to put himself in the same category. Unreal the electorate lets him get away with it too.

lol, finasteride doesn't mentally impair anyone, and it works quite well

After the letter hit the media, that same doctor tried to wiggle out of putting his reputation behind calling Trump 'healthy'

nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-doctor-wrote-health-letter-just-5-minutes-limo-waited-n638526

Yeah that's what I meant. Reagan won by a landslide, while Trump barely squeaked by. You also still see a lot of Republicans who would've loved to suck Reagan's dick, while Trump's already causing fractures within the party just a couple months in.

For what it's worth, I don't like Reagan and I think Trump is a fucking joke. It's just hilarious that he acts as if he has the same level of popularity. The odds of him pulling the same trick in 2020, especially with how quickly people have been turning on him would mean a goddamn miracle. This election ended up being a bit of a statistical anomaly, in large part because the rust belt was such a toss-up that ended up landing on his side. I don't see that happening a second time. I know 4 years is a long time and things can change, but he's been making a really terrible first impression.

And, most importantly for this thread, he looks like shit. He's lucky if he even makes it the next 4 years without some sort of serious medical complication. Especially since the stress involved with his new job is so enormous.

I seriously hope you're right, but this is the same voting public that re-elected Bush. And the incredible apathy of the democratic voting base and unlikelihood of them showing up to the polls for any reason other than to stop nuclear war (and even then) also makes me worried 8 years of Trump is possible.

>This election ended up being a bit of a statistical anomaly
probably because the dems put out what was arguably the worst candidate/campaign possible.

It's going to depend a LOT of the dem's candidate. They fucked up shilling Hillary so hard, knowing that she's a very divisive figure. And it bit them in the ass, as she managed to lose against the least popular candidate to make it to the general election in a long-ass time. Not going to many of the vital swing states more often to campaign sure as shit didn't help.

As long as they don't put out someone like her again, they'd have that shit on lock.I bet you Biden would've wiped the floor with Trump. He's a far more likeable guy than either Trump or Hillary, and doesn't have the sort of skeletons in his closet that either of them have. Sanders is another one that would've killed Trump, due to him also running on a populist public stance while actually having populist policies to go with them. Warren going on solely a "Fuck the banks" platform would probably also be enough to stomp Trump into the ground, especially when he has so many Goldman-Sachs people in his administration.

Or hell, just put out a relative unknown with a likeable personality, policy ideas that resonate with the poor and middle class, and doesn't have a shady history.

Biden talked about how he wished he would have ran in 2016, and how he feels like he could have won. Maybe he runs in 2020?

But yeah, whoever they pick to run against Trump, as long as they aren't a pile of shit they will win

I'm not sure how anyone could seriously argue that she would have been worse than Trump. Sure, she's unpopular, maybe even not particularly competent, but at least she isn't completely unhinged, tweeting about porn videos at 3AM on some prescription drug high.

Pretty healthy for an year old. Doesn't drink or do drugs and hasn't since his brother died

Kys

>does 3 speeches all in the same day
>flied all the way back to his tower in manhatten every night
He has HIGH ENERGY so pretty healthy

Sanders would have been absolutely fucking demolished lmao

No but Seriously, How fit is President Trump?

Yeah, I read that quote from him. I think people would've accepted a President Biden. He's a likeable guy, he didn't cause any problems when he was VP, and compared to both Trump and Clinton he might as well be a fucking saint. I think he also would've really pushed extra-strong for his own Supreme Court Justice, as GOP wouldn't be able to stall that for a whole 4 years. They could get away with it against Obama since he was on the way out, but taking too much longer would've really caused problems.

Honestly, I can't blame the guy if he just wanted to take a nice, long break. VP isn't nearly as brutal a position as full POTUS, but stepping out of the government circus for a little while will probably be good for him. If he does run in 2020, he's going to be nice and refreshed, while Trump will really be feeling the rigors of the role by then.

Why the fuck are you still believing in the skewed media polls?
Seriously, you idiots really cling to ideology so hard, it blurs your visions of the events, the causes and the effects.

>a woman who's fucked up literally every leadership job that she's ever had wouldn't have been a worse president than a man who's run a successful multinational corporation for almost fifty years

Middle kek

You tell me

He really is the face (& body) of america

>a woman who's fucked up literally every leadership job that she's ever had

She was a pretty successful Senator for a long time. That was probably before you were in grade school though

do you get your news from breitbart, or from Veeky Forums?

>what is Benghazi

Do you read or watch anything other than Fox/Breitbart/etc? Even the republican organiser of the Benghazi commission admitted Hilary basically had nothing to do with it. snopes.com/trey-gowdy-admitted-benghazi/

>inb4 I live in a putin-approved bubble where a sourced snopes article can't penetrate

>2017
>being old enough to have not been in grade school when Hillary was Senator but still being immature enough to think that she wasn't dog shit
WEW LAD

>A lefty
>Making derogatory remarks about someone's age

>snopes
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html

She had a >70% approval rating from her constituents, she still had a >60% approval rating as Secretary of State. I'm not sure what point you're even trying to make. Does it upset you that she was a succesful and well-liked politician prior to her presidential run?

Don't be such a dumb ducked faggot lmao

"i'm like, really scared that drumpf will be mean to our minorities and stuff :3"

There's literaly unedited video from Fox News where Trey Gowdy also exonerates Clinton. youtube.com/watch?v=5GsXrZSyIj0

Does that meet your standard of proof?

I wouldn't count on him being very fit at all. Apparently the guy only gets between 3-5 hours of sleep a night, which is already pretty awful, even with how much the President has to be on. I'd guess he probably consumes an absurd amount of caffeine to stay functional. Word from people in the White House have also said he spends a shitload of time watching tv, so I'm willing to bet he doesn't get much exercise. He does golf, which is something, but it's not exactly the most rigorous sport in the world.

I mean shit, Obama may have been pretty DYEL, but at least he got his cardio in.

>dailymail

Yeah and the same polls that said she had a >70% approval rating also said that she had a >98% chance of winning the presidency

If you actually checked any of the polls on election day, she was 55-60% chance of winning, ie. 40-45% chance of losing.

Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with the security faults at Benghazi; blame the CIA if you like, or lower-level state department officials—embassy security is out of the Secretary of State's purview.
And do you think that's the only leadership position she's been in? you might recall that she ran against Barack Obama in 2008; do you think that was her first foray into politics?
She was dog shit as a senator? Like overtly hostile to longstanding allies dogs shit? Decimating global trust in America and its commitment to democracy and longstanding treaties shit? Tweeting Breitbart-sourced conspiracy theories at 4 AM shit?

theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/29/benghazi-report-finds-no-smoking-gun-and-hillary-clinton-happy-to-move-on
nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0
foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/28/in-final-report-benghazi-committee-finds-no-new-evidence-of-clinton-wrongdoing/

Jesus Christ, go back to /pol/, that isn't what anyone is saying here

poll forecasts got New York state spot on

Tbqh if that slimy little faggot exonerates Clinton it just increases the likelihood that she's guilty

I'm right wing but.. jesus christ. Why couldn't America elect a respectable, intellectual nationalist instead of a fat small handed idiot like Drumpf

He was the leader of the commission that the Republicans voluntarily appointed. If they didn't believe he was going to get the result they were looking for, why did they appoint him? Nobody was forcing them to do so.

>Republican forced to exonerate democrat because there is literally no evidence to prove culpability
>He's not a real Republican anyway!
Really?

Daily reminder.

How much test is acceptable to take at that age?

>unironically defending Clinton
What are you even doing on Veeky Forums? You clearly don't lift