Are taller than average individuals genetically superior?

> 5'11"
MUST
BECOME
TALLER

>The Celts were the tall Chads back then
They still are.
t. 194cm celtic chad

vikinganswerlady.com/vikheight.shtml

I love how TV shows totally skewed todays' people perception of their ancestors. Fucking reminds me of socialistic realism or whatever was that shit called.

U really think people in 1-10th century were beastmode? Really? Maybe they had a king who was really wealthy who could afford to be fat, but I guarantee that most people were skinny/anorectic or ottermode at most.

topkek so all the "tall vikings" were 5'8"

thanks for proving my point. everybody else back then was like 5'4" from malnutrition. 5'8" is the perfect height

>U really think people in 1-10th century were beastmode?

Ancient statues don't represent reality. They're artistic works that use knowledge of anatomy to exaggerate the human form.

Height is strongly influenced by diet so no

>exaggerate the human form
The small penises do not corroborate, lad.

Yes but I'm 6'5 and into short women

Actually they do. Tiny penises were the hip thing

Literal 5'8.5 based master race checking in. The absolute perfect height for a man. If you want to get swole as fuck, this is the height, lads. See our current Mr. Olympia Phil Heath for a prime example. Or how about BASED gains lord Lex Fitness with his aesthetic perfection? Pic related.

Anyone taller than me is a lanklet who will never fill out their frame properly. Poor muscle insertions--too much bone, not enough meat. You'll never have the swole 3d photoshop look without pinning tons and tons of gear. Even with steroids, you'll probably never catch up to natty genetic specimens like Lex Fitness.

Turbo manlets below me will never have a shot at banging the hot women that the mighty manlets pull on the daily. Women love tall men, even if you're "only" 5'8.5 that's still well above average compared to the height of women who aren't ladyboys. As long as you're taller than the women you bang, you're good to go. Hell, with lifts I'm even taller than the 5'10 models I bang.

not necessarily

Elizabeth Debicki, she's 6'3

No. Average height males are the superior ones

>wears lifts
>has compulsion to be taller than the chicks he bangs

manlet is a state of mind, not of body

vegan stains got in this manlets face and made him look like a chump

theres no coming back from that

I've definitely met tall people that are genetically superior, but I've also met tall people that are pretty genetically messed up.

I'm pretty genetically lucky, but I attribute this to my ancestors being really fucking rich, so they married and had families with other genetically lucky people.
I'm:
>6'5"
>white
>blonde
>green eyes
>never broken a bone despite 3 sport athlete
>never get sick
>naturally skinny but easy gains, dad was a semi-pro bodybuilder in his youth
>7" dick
>pretty intelligent but this is mostly upbringing

Honestly though, I know this is gonna be a hot take, but I've seen much more genetically perfect short guys than genetically perfect tall guys. My theory is that in order for a short guy to have a big family, he's gonna really have to be genetically perfect to compete, he has a family with a genetically perfect short girl, and the short cycle continues.

Science has proved that 6'0 is literally the best male height. I don't remember women though.

>green eyes + blonde hair
I have to see this, post eyes + hair. You can blur the rest.

>You'll also notice that the tallest people are found in the gayest/most liberal countries.

And richest, most powerful.

>picks him up like a toddler

No, it depends. Just like dogs. You have have a huge tall tibetan mastiff that towers over all the other dogs at the dog park. Might live to 8 years old, might suffer from hip displasia after 6, may have a shitload of genetic problems from years of inbreeding. Who the fuck knows. Your 40lb australian shepherd might live twice as long and run every day until the day he dies.

But guess who's getting all that dog pussy after beating the fuck out of roaming coyotes and protecting the herd/family. Yeah, you guessed it, the big, genetically fucked tibetan mastiff. Go figure.

>everyone was malnourished back then
>vikings were 5'8
>5'8 is not malnourished and is the perfect height
i'm not following

Pretty sure mongolians were manlets bro.
Is that right? I forgot all those slave bred negros were the richest and most powerful. Same with South Africa, right? What? No?

Tried to take a picture with my phone and the file size was too large. My hair and eyes change with the season, in the winter they are darker hazel green and my hair is dirtier blonde, and then in the summer my hair gets blonder and my eyes are a deep blue green.

youre ignorant. vikings tore through every army they ever faced.

their advantages were two fold
1) mythology of ragnarok. dying in battle was the greatest honor you could. vikings went into battle in pure suicidal frenzies that intimidated the fuck out of the frankish, celtic anglo saxons of the day.
b) vikings were in extremely Veeky Forums physical shape due to the harsh constant rowing, hunting and seafaring upbringing in 7th century scandinavia. im sure Veeky Forums people would apprecaite the odds of the fat beach muscle fucks at the gym versus lean natty berserker mode dudes in a fight with swords.

I'm pretty sure small penises were more of a groin thing

im no scandinavian but read about Guthram and the conquest of England. a tiny viking army practically conquered all of england / scotland in just five years against immeasurably greater numbers and fortofoed enemies.

theres a reason monks sang prayers of protection against these pricks. they meant business. it was only after Christianity took over and the black death hit scandinavia the hardest did the entire north of Europe get rid of this nightmare

>height beyond 5'8" is physiologically inefficient and prone to weakness/injury/death

Yeah but tall people can just put all the medicine and food on a high shelf and then all the manlets will die

it wasn't because they were fucking manlets it was because they took drugs and literally slaughtered anything that moved in the vicinity.

Britains lost to the vikings for the same reason they lost to the colonies, because the Britains tried to play by the "rules of war" and got fucked in their wig wearing asses.

...

never said they were manlets. said they had a far more effective martial ethos in their era than their neighbors. and they were in far better physical shape, which REALLY helps in hand to hand combat.

as for playing by the rules, i think youre just imagining a early medieval world that never existed. look up the Viking shield wall formations and their cavalry tactics in the sack of the kindgoms of Northumbria, mercer and east anglia.

the reason they called Alfred the Great was because he was the ONLY kīng in Europe in the entire early medieval period who successfully stood up to psychos.

still in a sexual way though ? right ;_; ?

This is frightening

LMAO AT HOW HE RUNS

one fall or strong contact and this guy will break lots of bones

She seems nice.

They were part of the ideal form. As far as I know it was their form of "feminine penis".

False people who are taller generally tend to make more money, get promoted faster and have better sex and more of it.

Slenderman?

I remember seeing this video shared all over social media a while back as if this guy would be the next big thing in the NBA. He doesn't move even close to well enough and like you mentioned, he's likely way too fragile.

>5'9
>8 inch cock
>105 iq

At least I have something

Depends on the circumstances. Being smaller has always been an advantage during food shortages, however. Now that it's mostly an aesthetics thing, and we have excess food, It doesn't really matter. Our bodies themselves won't matter at all once we integrate with technology either.

>105
So what average?

eh dissapointing they're like a hazel green which are relatively common I thought you had like those super bright greens and like norse blond hair. not this matted stuff Also you better have a model tier face to go with it or this was just a meme

You think height explains why vikings had successful missions? You must be one sad individual. Vikings attacked mostly civilian places that had no trained force or much else after the fall of Rome. Spain was the only place that kept progressing and vikings did really badly there, because they still had something that resembled a state.

Emotional intelligence my friend.

*deep coherent breathing*

I could psyche myself up like bobby bousher just with the control of my breath. My football coaches loved me

What?

Actually they hated how people kept breaking the penis off statues, so the made them small

...

>haircuts are genetic

>this is what americans think is green eyes and blonde hair

>vikings
>good in warfare

Kek, vikings got BTFO every time they went up against a real army instead of peasants and monks.

>trying to outrun the uncanny valley

im actually dying right now
fuck sakes

don't ever speak ill of debicki again

A weapon to surpass metal gear

they didn't

It's not even close to Halloween why are you postin skelly memes

ACTSHUALLY

Recent findings show that while they pillaged,fought and looted, the vikings were also big traders, and had extensive trade networks down to the Mediterranean. They also liked jewelry and fancy clothes.

The Swedish metrosexuality was going strong even in the 10th century.

This is completely wrong because natural selection has already proven that the selection of taller people to bne successful. That's why the average height has increased substantially since we started measuring it. In 300 years manlet status will be anything under 6"4'

>rape the armies
>peasants and monks
>army

>still doesn't show any examples of armies they've raped

Protip: Average is genetically superior. That's why it's average.

ayy lmao

Lol I don't know who the fuck that person is, but it's not me. I was actually green eyes.

I think what you mean to say is, you have retard strength

have*

t. doesn't understand statistics

>History shows that even in combat, manlet army vs. giant army, manlets win every time
hmm...

Even Alexander struggled to defeat the Scythians (arguably the last aryan tribe) despite vastly outnumbering them

>implying that he would fight a retarded black vegan mentaly challanged dude in front of his sponsors and everyone else

If they cut their hair like that as a woman it's obvious they're retarded. NO ONE finds that good looking, only middle aged wives

i hate the short hair meme it needs to stop REEEEEE

The fun thing is to see how widespread Viking Disease has become as a result of their wanderings. In Scotland there are significant differences in Dupuytren's Contracture between the various genetic descendants of Scandies, Gaels and "Caledonians".

Alicia vakander is hot af

>Height beyond 5'8" is pure sexual selection
Bullshit. Northern Europeans are naturally taller than 5'8" when the nutrition is right. It's not as much selection because Stone Age Europeans grew periodically to 5'10" also.

>Womanlets
When will they learn?
Women who aren't at least 6ft are a waste of space and should just end themselves.

discord.gg/bp44v4s

Manlet support discord

For people struggling with anxiety, depression and otherwise disadvantaged due to bad genes. Femlets are allowed too!

Wrong way around
Women who are above 5'5'' are a genetic waste of space and should kill themselves

t. 4'9 goblin.

no im a guy who is 6'1''
Most tall dudes i know go crazy for short qts

and yet you look like a old kid next to 6'3

>short
>qts
Pick one.

it was maybe 10 years ago. Now its 6'2

This is onebof the things many misunderdtand about the Viking and Hibernian relationship. The Vikings never successfully invaded Ireland, they did have trading outposts. The celtic network also went down to the mediterranean (going back at least to antiquity).

The Vikings are supposedly related to the Volga river peoples (Tartars p much) and had trade starting along that network going towards the middle east prior to the European contact.

Can we all agree that being 6'4 as a guy is just objectively better? Guys fear you, women love you. Sure, you have harder time putting on mass, but even by entering ottermode you would make 5'10 look small and pathetic, no matter how ripped he is

Being tall is a manly trait, this is why we like tall guys because they have a manly trait
Being tall is like having muscles or a beard, it belongs on men

Meanwhile women are supposed to be small, short, petite and cute

if you see a short, slender guy you laugh because its not manly
If you see a big, tall woman its the exact same thing

If you want to date men but cant come out of the closet completly then tall bitches is for you

fucking laughed hard at the file name

women can be both tall AND short and be considered attractive.

just in different ways.

a tall woman is seen as elegant and gracious.

a short girl is petite and cutesy.

it's harder for men. if you're a short guy, well, you're a manlet. being tall doesn't help too much either, because you can be seen as goofy and clumsy.

after a certain point, tall people's face gets all goofy looking, something gets weird with their genetics.

Yes Veggie gains is the perfect example of lanklet superiorty