Veeky Forums Eternally BTFO yet again

rebelcircus.com/blog/muscular-men-make-the-worst-boyfriends-according-to-science//

>implying women don't subconsciously want sexist boyfriends

>____________"worst/best"_________according to science

What is confirmation bias

People find muscular men more threatening precisely because that's the stereotype of them. The study only looks at reported data instead of actual quantifiable metrics (e.g. age-controlled comparisons of domestic violence convictions between high and low muscle mass individuals). Therefore it is subject to bias

might as well say 'researchers find correlation between bitch-ass betas and white-knighting'.

Well gee, it's like muscular guys could choose easily between partners... you know... like women do.

I wonder how buff these researchers were...

If that's not jewish propaganda, I don't know what is. "be weak" "obey us" "don't ask questions"
This is ridiculous

don't change Veeky Forums
(except in muscle mass)

it's more likely the feminine imperative at work. betas will read it and decide never to buy a gym membership, making it easier for women to avoid them as sexual partners, while alphas will laugh and close the window.

basically this

Come on Jews!

>media trying to pander to the masses
it's not a conspiracy you dip, it's business.

You don't get it lads,that "research" is a good thing.

Everything that article said is basically "muscular men are machos and sexists and objectify women"

It basically proves that lifting cures autism

>According to science
No, no, no...WRONG!
"According to *social science*" is what it should say, and social science is not science. It seldom adheres to empiricism and can always be falsified (i.e. I can find ten other girls who think Chad is a better boyfriend/how does one measure "better" i.e. what if I determine other traits define "better"?).
This is just more cultural Marxist bullshit designed to elevate betas and gammas into the breeding pool by attacking Chads. Ignore it. These people can say whatever they like. Women select mates based on positions in leadership hierarchies. Muscular men will always be desirable because they will always be able to physically crush betas. Even if a woman *does* marry a beta, they will always cheat on and/or leave him for a Chad.

tl:dr ignore what women say (especially women who take part in these studies) and observe what they do.

>Muscular men make the worst doormats, according to women

>subconsciously
Not even that, they're open about wanting sexist men. Go ask any woman, even a feminist, is she asks men out on dates or is interested in guys less assertive than she is.
The only reason we have traditional gender roles is women refuse to date guys that aren't sexist

>The muscle-bound types were also the ones who said they would respond with hostility to their partners flirting with other guys.
>This is presented as some kind of character flaw.
>???

I hate to do a /pol/ derail, and am sorry for those who are sick to death of it

but you fags are aware plenty of zionists are le-masculine right?
Like Arnold, Clint Eastwood, De-Niro
all examples of "alpha" male figures who support isreal right

If you are gonna be a jew hater by all means but at least know what you're talking about

Fuck those libcucks.

Having an aesthetic face and a muscular frame will make you the best boyfriend material.

/pol/acks are not really consistent with their worldview. theyre triggered easily and dumb as fuck, so don't take them seriously.

no user jews aren't bad because they are a supremacist institution that hold the entire world back from world piece they are bad because something something something white genocide something something something something something The West

" The study concluded that for muscular men, working out—and more importantly, the masculine feeling they get from working out—actually affects their brains in the same way a drug would affect an addict's brain.
"
LMAO its called testosterone you fags, jesus christ this article is a a piece of leftist feminist LGBT trash

-to mentally and physically weak women that are both jealous and insecure.

So belief in traditional gender roles => bad people. Oh, ok that's not moralizing at all

This whole article is just another leftist sjw cuck circus using supposedly unbiased media to mindwash idiots

I want a strong, macho bf to dominate me.

>masses

That guy is hot as fuck (no homo)

my gf openly loves it when I am hostile about that stuff. she lives being treated like something I own.

this is not a unique belief.

Agreed.
Women like having a subservient beta boyfriend who will do whatever they ask, whenever. But they end up losing all sexual attraction for them because they are so weak and submissive and will probably end up cheating or breaking up with them.
Secretly all women lust as a confident, powerful man who gets what he wants and doesn't apologize for it. But these powerful men are far and inbetween now a days and many 'alpha masculant men' end up in a cycle of just fucking chicks and not settling down due to slutty teen pussy being so easy to come by and modern relationship expectations being so one-sided in favor of women.

Jesus that webpage gave my mobile AIDS.

>"According to *social science*" is what it should say, and social science is not science.

This, so much this. Social science (also known as soft science) doesn't follow the rigorous testing, peer reviewing and data collection requirements that real (hard) science has. I know a guy that works in material science (metal alloys with a focus on magnetism) and he (along with all guys he works with) is angry about how psychology "science" is dragging the whole field of science down because if their poorly researched and poorly executed studies.

>reading anything off rebelcircus
Go back to bitching about how punk didn't die in 95

>it's like muscular guys could choose easily between partners

You're new, huh?

They are pandering to the massives

What a disgusting hambeast

>All is social science is bad

Not really, only the so called "radical science" sect of social science does this (eg make unfounded claims and toy with language to affect political policy). Actual social science (the stuff you don't hear about from sjws or read in sensational click bait articles) is just as evidence based and reasonable as biology or chemistry.

Why are any of you upset when it's very likely that most of Veeky Forums don't even have gf's or are attractive and muscular?

>attractive men have the most choices and are less willing to put up with your bullshit

Well no shit.

>soft low test men are beta
wtf who would have thought, what revolutionary SCIENCE.
I fucking hate social """science"""

zionism is fine, I would love if all the jews were in israel and had no control over my home

>Clint Eastwood
that's news to me
anyway, I was joking with the jews, obviously. But there's definitely some kind of agenda trying to change traditional way of life and seeing things. And it's pushed to comical degree at times.

This. 90% of the reason women flirt in the first place is because they want to feel like a desired object.

One in the same.

The guys that you named are actors, lifeforms lower than prostitutes. Beeing allied and supported by actors is proof of that lifeforms demonic attributes and deeds.

>Chads pump and dump tonnes of chicks
>Chad can only wife one of them
>Chad is therefore unsuccessful, as he pumped and dumped more chicks than he wifed

Are neo-libs and feminists really this retarded?

Or are they just sour because they were just one of Chad's drunken night's casual pump and dump, and didn't get to play the wifey role?

There is literally nothing wrong with Zionism.

Fucking Muslim scum invaded those lands in the first place

Are you fucking stupid? Since when did /pol/ love/worship celebrities?

The cult of celebrity worship is for liberals.

Yes

>Since when did /pol/ love/worship celebrities?

Trump

Er no. You have normative and positive as one major kind of divide (and hey ho both are valid), and another common one would be something like behavioural/psychological vs rational.

If not all social science is bad, then it's up to good social scientists to purge their ranks of the bad.
I have degrees in engineering and comp science and work as a lab tech for a major institution (I help design and set-up experiments). It makes my fucking blood boil to be lumped into the same category as these fucking idiots. They're making the general population even more retarded than they were in the past, and undermining the social and cultural currency of science by politicizing it.
Only this weekend, I had an argument with a (female) friend who was disagreeing with my dismissal of a similar retarded report. I explained to her that it was of no more value than a collection of anecdotes. I tried to remind her of the principles of empiricism and falsifiability - I know she learned them because we went to school together. She gave me some ridiculous pseudo-scientific bullshit about the observer effect proving that reality was subjective, and then warned me that I was starting to sound like a Trump supporter. This is all a 1st in English lit from a Russell Group uni gets you in current year England.
I'm an avid reader of (and believer in the value of) the classics. I haven't traditionally written off the importance of the arts and creative writing to society, but I've come firmly to the conclusion that only STEM degrees mean anything in the modern world. If you have a BA in anything, you may as well show me the "I took part in..."certificate you got for finishing second-from-last in the egg-and-spoon race in primary school. That degree has the same inherent value as one-ply bogroll as far as I'm concerned. Even the BSc's are on shaky ground since so much worthless shit is being accredited along with legit degrees these days. Only the BEng's are still on solid ground.

that's not how propaganda works, they don't advocate that you be like those guys in their outlets like Salon, Vice, MSNBC, Buzzfeed etc. Those are just supporters of Israel. If you want to give input, at least know how to distinguish between things.

Learn how about how sympathy and antipathy is pushed. Now, you're too stupid to think


learn to read

The way she scurried off gave me a good chuckle

Alex Jones. Nigel Farage.

>it makes my blood boil when this retarded person who went to my school says retarded things when I have retard arguments with them
user... you rode the short bus too bro.

TPBP

I'm talking about Hollywood dipshit

Right wingers don't hate Israelis inherently, they hate the diplomatic relations between western governments and Israel (aid money, geopolitical wars and assistance, mossad). Only socialists and muslims actually care about Palestinians and their whining

Right wingers want to cut ties to the middle east and close borders, only trading goods, but Israel must pay for its military and regional strategy only with its own money

>I am not the invisible friend who sat next to you on the short bus, user. I didn't take a bus to school. I lived at the school.

You misread. I said it makes my blood boil to be placed in the same category as social scientists (i.e. by media such as that cited by OP), when I am an actual scientist who worked his ass off for his accreditation.
My friend didn't make my blood boil. I was mildly condescending at worst (she did in fact pull the "mansplaining" card). I was actually sad for her, because she used to be bright and articulate, and very well read. Now she has really let herself go appearance wise, and tries to drag every conversation towards politics despite knowing I'm apolitical. She genuinely believes that Trump is a serial rapist who is still raping women on the regular, and that if he isn't killed soon then the world is doomed. It's easy to dismiss people like this on the internet but I've known this girl since I was 11 years old and am just a little depressed by the turn her life has taken and my own inability to snap her out of it. She went from being a bubbly and energetic 11-25 to an angry cunt who's becoming harder and harder to be around and exhausting what remains of my sympathy, but I'm still not angry with her.

> Trump wasn't in the apprentice

Why are you moving the goalpost?

It's because Veeky Forums is one of the four gateway boards to Veeky Forums. Redditors flock to Veeky Forums and have no clue how to be a part of the board culture because they're fucking retarded and don't take the time to lurk. It's been like this for the past four years at least. They don't have their joke or sarcasm indicators so they take everything 100% seriously. Even if they do understand that it's a joke, the only thing they'll contribute is a "This." or an "Underrated post." because they can't click their upvote button but need the world to know about their opinion.

To top it off everyone is incredibly self-righteous and arrogant because they read the sticky and all of the sudden have a lot more knowledge than they did before. They think it's the end all, be all of fitness knowledge and so they try to preach and instruct others when, in fact, they know the barest minimum and should shut the fuck up. The most outspoken posters happen to be the ones that have the most shallow knowledge about the subject. Veeky Forums has always been hot garbage, but at least it used to have its moments. Nu-Veeky Forums is just bullshit and circlejerking 100% of the time.

This. Underrated post.

Why do you keep shitting up threads with this pasta? You've just described the perpetual reality of every board on Veeky Forums since the inception of Veeky Forums. Shoo!

the reality is that women don't listen to themselves, like us, they listen to their pussy head. they want the muscles, character wise you should all work on yourselves psychically and emotionally. this article makes us Veeky Forumsisens sound unreliable yet somehow omits all responsibility from women. if you're fit you will get puss, simple as that but will the puss be worth an actual relation? will you trade a life of bachelorhood for one puss? that's a high price for puss and women don't want to admit it.

underrated

>Gender roles

Stopped reading there

i know right? what are womens roles? be whores until their 40s and then find some chump to marry them? fuck that.

>let's judge a group of people based on their body!
I thought they didn't want others "shaming" with fat people, loving these double standards.

>40s

way too late. they hit the wall at about 30.

> this is a reddit thing

It started on Veeky Forums.

yes

this

Wait people are actually marrying 40 year old women. I thought it was depressing seeing women turn from Aphrodite to Aunt Jemima in less than a decade or two...

wew lad....

>something something white genocide

The party girls usually crack at 25.
From 25 onwards is just a descent into sadness as they blow any natural beauty they might've had.

>ignore what women say
This. What women say they want and what they actually want are completely different. Women do not want a guy who treats her like an equal, no matter how much they claim otherwise

>look up artist's other works
>nothing but black people slaughtering white people

j-just a coincidence?

>Wanting to be a boyfriend

Never
Gonna
Make
It

[coincidence intensifies]

Jokes on you I met ones who cracked at 19

which schools of social "science" are evidence based? anthropology used to be evidence based until the 80s/90s. sociology and psychology have been feels-based since day one

I'm pretty sure the OP article is pretty old. I've never met a girl who didn't want a sexist boyfriend.

>De-Niro
le-masculine. I like his performance in Taxi Driver but he isn't really a manly man.

>Actual social science (the stuff you don't hear about from sjws or read in sensational click bait articles) is just as evidence based and reasonable as biology or chemistry.

bullshit
not a single social science "experiment" can ever be replicated and verified with anything close to the accuracy that you get in chem and bio (and most other hard sciences)

Apparently we're all meant to be literal cucks.

We make bad boyfriends because we find other sexy girls to replace our old girlfriends when they give us shit.

...

>pasting a long string of off-topic bullshit because you don't have anything meaningful to contribute
yes you certainly aren't a redditor at all!

>"""sexist beliefs"""
>cuck media
Almost there bby, go to buy a fishing magazine to see what bait really looks like

kek nice

If a man has the upper hand compared to you, he's more prone to treat you with less respect. That's why you don't go for men physically more attractive than you or much wealthier than you.

Brutal

No sympathy for this bitch. She held out for Chad while other men were fawning over her. I'm glad she's ded

Joke's on you, I don't even have a gf!

>She held out for Chad while other men were fawning over her
Where do you get that from?

pretty homo erotic famalam

My girlfriend would disagree.

Is this science or Science™?

>women
>being candid in what they want

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

It's almost like people with a passion for something want to share that passion with other people because it's a massive common interest.