Remember back in the day when VeganGay castrated himself?

Remember back in the day when VeganGay castrated himself?
>tfw veganism is better than roids and testicles

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QVopqxfs3rQ
books.google.com/books?id=QWSn4iKgNo8C&pg=PA50&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3366734
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10898248
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22518835
andersnedergaard.dk/en/kropblog/sarcoplasmic-hypertrophy/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Implying both aren't on roids
>Implying comparing a meme bodybuilder to an actual athlete makes sense.

Ok user.

He didn't cut off his balls, he cut off the exit of the sperm through the dick
Thread x:
>Uhhh veygan gaynss is weak and malnourished
>Thread y:
>Uhhh veygan gaynss roids, that's why he's big

COPE HARDER BITCH BOY

clarence is also vegan

What happens to the sperm? Does it goes into the brain instead?

it dies

>squats hundreds of kilos and is one of the strongest guys i've seen on youtube
>looks dyel in clothes

vs

>barely benches 2plate
>arms are twice as big

i guess "show muscles" do exist

Where does the dead sperm go? Does it go into his brain instead?

he can still bust a nut, his sperm is just not fertile (idk if its corret term for this but you get it), even if he'll cum in your mom's pussy she won't get pregnant

so you just described bodybuilders and oly/power lifters

The balls reabsorb it, like they do if you don't ejaculate for a while.

filthy frank and somalis take steroids now?

>filthy Frank
Underage b&

>doesnt know filthy frank
normies get out

that's harry potter

do people really still hate richard? Havent we all grown up yet?

FUCK THE FUKIN STREET FUCKING SIGNS FFS

>watches filthy Frank
>uses "normie"
Underage b&

i bet that you're one of those sjw faggots who get offended by racist and dark jokes filthy frank makes, kys

Thanks for throwing porn into the thread, retard.

Holy fuck this newfag. Go watch some SJW REKT compilations

kek

go back to /r/Feminism you triggered cuck

Don't like him but cherry picking pics from bad angles is BS. No natty looks good in that position-- fact.

Who's that skinny nigger?

t. Zyklon Piana.

...

It's a fisheye lens. Do you really think Virgin Gains' left arm is that much bigger than his right? It's just closer to the camera.

harry squatter

>and here we see a young harry squatter standing next to his green house elf friend dobby

His right arm is still looks twice the size of Clarence's left, it's not distorted in the center

he also has no muscle definition
you think someone this lean has zero bicep definition?
it's very clearly photoshopped, not done with a fisheye lens

Jesus Christ it's definitely summer. There's no way you're older than 14

>early august
>definitely summer
no shit

His right arm is in front of Clarence's.

He's not that lean anymore, that's an old photo from when he was bodybuilding. He does have higher bodyfat than Clarence, hence the less defined muscles.

Also it's not a shop, it's taken right from a video:
youtube.com/watch?v=QVopqxfs3rQ

>harry squatter and the echo chamber of veganism

>Uhhh veygan gaynss is weak and malnourished
>Uhhh veygan gaynss roids, that's why he's big
These aren't mutually exclusive. That's why Jason Genova is so entertaining to watch, because even with access to steroids he's still failing at everything he does
Seriously, how long has this faggot been training? And he's still barely bigger than a 23 year old olympic weight lifter?

By the way, if your vegan brain hasn't deteriorated yet. You'd know that muscles does not mean strength. Clarence doesn't train for muscles. He trains to get stronger. In Olympic weightlifting as an advanced athlete, he'd probably would be doing 1-3 reps at 95% 1RM. Sarcoplasmic growth happens at 8-20. In some circumstances Clarence actually had to lose muscle to be able to preform the lifts correctly. His bicep size became too big for him to be able to do a front squat/clean properly.

So to say that even not considering the chance of steroid use, the fact that he's barely bigger than Clarence with much more years of training AND sarcoplasmic training nonetheless, it's just pathetic.

wow piano is fucking huge

the irony of this post is lost on the indoctrinated holocaust supporters.

This is beyond sad, the guy is disabled and people troll the fuck out of him. Disgusting behaviour. Im all for bants and dark jokes, but not literally trolling a disabled man.

Man, I never said that I wish he failed. I'm just saying he does. And he's absolutely delusional while doing it.

Is this shopped or are that dudes arms really that long

Fucking anorexic gorrilla mode

You're not actually being serious, right?

The camera lens distorts the picture. youtube fitness faggots use wide angle lenses to look bigger

Most guys work arms way too much and at very disproportionate

Most people think I'm just in decent shape because of my arm size. Then I take the shirt off for the great reveal. Girls find surprising gains much sexier than show off gains

I'm probably dead average as far as arm size in my gym but rarely is there more than 1 guy bigger and/or stronger than me and I can barely hit x/3/4/5

I think you meant hypertrophy not sarcoplasmic

What's your arm size?
>inb4 18

yeah im not saying you personally do it senpai. Hes delusional because he is mentally disabled

Nope. Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is when the area around the myofibrils expands while Myofibrillar hypertrophy is when the total volume of myofibrils themselves expand. Myofibrils are of course the inner workings of the muscle fiber.

I used sarcoplasmic hypertrophy (or sarcoplasmic growth) to differentiate between myofibrillar hypertrophy. Myofibrillar hypertrophy works best with lower reps higher intensity while sarcoplasmic hypertrophy works best with higher reps lower intensity.

Ultimately a routine that solely contains sets down in the 1-5 rep range would produce some hypertrophy, but it would be myofibrillar hypertrophy. This type of hypertrophy is often much less than sarcoplasmic, as it's harder to create brand new myofibrils. than it is to simply expand the muscle fiber

Thus I'm suggesting vegan gays being a little bitch because he is barely bigger than someone doing some combination of myofibrillar hypertrophy/CNS training than he is doing practically only sarcoplasmic. He IS of course a bodybuilder and if he doesn't do it shows a lack of understanding of biomechanically structure. In which case he holds absolutely no right to criticize people in a topic he knows ZERO about. On the other hand if he's still a failure of a body builder after doing proper training.

>Getting a vasectomy and literally chopping your balls off are the same thing

Holy shit I thought clarence was yolked

I absolutely love how you're trying to be a pretentious little "I just started googling the first things about exercise science" faggot while clearly having absolutely no fucking clue of the practical implications of what you're saying. You can't train specifically for either type of hypertrophy in any meaningful capacity. You can't stimulate one much more than a shred of a percent more than the other with differing training methods. AT BEST your choice of lifting style will illicit literally under a percent more of one type over the other. Please off yourself for the good of everyone around you.

Fucking hell, you have a lot to learn. There's a reason why bodybuilders sometimes do up to 25 reps in their programs. That's because volume increases sarcoplasmic hypertrophy to a greater extent. Ultimately an increase in one does result in an increase in another, but the fact of the matter is that if you wish to prioritize strength and hence myofibillar hypertrophy you would work in lower rep ranges than if you wish to prioritize size and hence sarcoplasmic hypertrophy.

>books.google.com/books?id=QWSn4iKgNo8C&pg=PA50&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false

>Depending on the training routine, these types of fiber hypertrophy are manifested in varying degrees (it seems that pure sarcoplasmic or myofilbrillar hypertrophy never occurs). Mostly myofilbrillar hypertrophy is found in elite weightlifters (if the training program is designed properly), whereas sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is typically seen in bodybuilders. Except for very special cases in which the aim of heavy resistance training is to achieve body weight gains, athletes are interested in inducing myofilbrillar hypertrophy.

its shopped look at his torso, vegan is 6'3 and clearance is 5'10

It's the exact same in the youtube video

Look at that actual numbers, dude. I'm not denying that those types of fiber hypertrophy are elicited in varying degrees by your choice of training method, I'm saying it's negligible, and the literature isn't even conlficted on that.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3366734
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10898248
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22518835
andersnedergaard.dk/en/kropblog/sarcoplasmic-hypertrophy/

SAGE

>first study
How does this study determine sarcoplasmic increase? As far as I remember, the only way to accurately determine it was from examining a cubic centimeter of muscle, in which case I find it hard pressed to find any athlete willing to donate that much muscle.
>next two studies
Untrained males have the ability to grow muscle very quickly. Sure we can agree on untrained males being able to grow almost equal parts sarcoplasm/myofibrils. But as trainees get more advanced, I believe they can further specialize their muscle growths.

My point is that the differentiation between different training methods builds up over time. My point is that if the strength based athletes only trained for 3 years to achieve that percent change of myofibillar hypertrophy, then over the course of 20 or 25 years, that could become even more specialized to increase the total amount of myofibrils.

There is absolutely no way your out of middle school, let alone high school.