Does prehistory belong here?

It's annoying how many pseudo genetics prehistory threads are made in this board, they're usually full of racists, I say we put a stop to this.

His us the middle ground between /leftypol/ and /pol/, this is to be expected.

We make fun of people like this with the finno-korean hyper war where the Finnish khaganate took on the Hwan empire.

As opposed to pseudo linguistic prehistory threads that have even less evidence than any genetic studies?

There is no basis for assuming that a proto-Dravidian language was spoken in all of the subcontinent. Pure conjecture.

Always the same butthurt Paki. You're not 100% West Asians but halfway between them and Dravidian Pajeets.

My take on this circa 3200 BC before steppe migrations.
Original image is chronologically nonsensical.

Name a single instance where Dravidians have been known to set a foot in Indus valley and I will give you the benefit of doubt. Until then, you are an ignorant afghan trash who is conveniently unaware that Pajeets wewuzz your lands just as much as the Indus region.

Ironically, the only trace of Dravidian language in Pakistan is in the Iranic parts.

tell me more about that basque

Kangz of Stonehenge, but maybe not.
Nobody really knows where the Basque language came from but the prevailing hypothesis is that some part of Neolithic Europe. Doesn't really mean they had to be from Iberia.

i always found prehistory interesting
seems like the more you go back, the weirder shit becomes
or maybe its the reverse
anyway, any idea why the uralics were so spread?
were they the only one willing to live that far north?

The chronology is messed up. Uralics weren't there at the time but thousands of years later.
Indigenous European Hunter Gatherers lived in the area and spoke languages we have no idea about and probably never will.