It's annoying how many pseudo genetics prehistory threads are made in this board, they're usually full of racists, I say we put a stop to this.
Does prehistory belong here?
His us the middle ground between /leftypol/ and /pol/, this is to be expected.
We make fun of people like this with the finno-korean hyper war where the Finnish khaganate took on the Hwan empire.
As opposed to pseudo linguistic prehistory threads that have even less evidence than any genetic studies?
There is no basis for assuming that a proto-Dravidian language was spoken in all of the subcontinent. Pure conjecture.
Always the same butthurt Paki. You're not 100% West Asians but halfway between them and Dravidian Pajeets.
My take on this circa 3200 BC before steppe migrations.
Original image is chronologically nonsensical.
Name a single instance where Dravidians have been known to set a foot in Indus valley and I will give you the benefit of doubt. Until then, you are an ignorant afghan trash who is conveniently unaware that Pajeets wewuzz your lands just as much as the Indus region.
Ironically, the only trace of Dravidian language in Pakistan is in the Iranic parts.
tell me more about that basque
Kangz of Stonehenge, but maybe not.
Nobody really knows where the Basque language came from but the prevailing hypothesis is that some part of Neolithic Europe. Doesn't really mean they had to be from Iberia.
i always found prehistory interesting
seems like the more you go back, the weirder shit becomes
or maybe its the reverse
anyway, any idea why the uralics were so spread?
were they the only one willing to live that far north?
The chronology is messed up. Uralics weren't there at the time but thousands of years later.
Indigenous European Hunter Gatherers lived in the area and spoke languages we have no idea about and probably never will.
thanks for clearing that up
My image is 3200 be too though
I don't understand this post. Is this a meme that's somehow passed me by? The Dravidian urheimat is unknown, and I haven't really seen anybody claiming otherwise. Obviously there are competing models but nobody who claims any certainty will be taken remotely seriously, including you.
Corded Ware starts in Poland no earlier than 3000 BC
Corded Ware weren't Polack subhumans. I'm fucking tired of Slavhists stealing Proto-Germanic Corded Ware.
You've got it all wrong, those threads are the best thing about Veeky Forums.
Poland is still the place where the pre-CW Ukies migrated to create CW. Granted they didn't stick around all that long before expanding to Scandinavia, Baltic countries and Russia.
>Proto-Germanic Corded Ware.
Question: we seem to have a fairly strong understanding of the origins of European IEs like the Celts, Italics, Germanics, Balts and Slavs, but what about peoples like the Illyranians, Dacians and Thracians? What cultures do they derive from?
Yamna
>literally every Corded is R1a
>Western Europe is mostly R1b
How are they Germanic? They are clearly more closely related to Slavs.
>fairly strong understanding of the origins of European IEs like the Celts, Italics, Germanics, Balts and Slavs
We really don't.
Scandis have 20% R1a. It was there centuries before R1b and I1.
But this Silesian guy is trolling. Balkan people are sometimes mentally ill like that. Not always and some are normal though.
I know that ultimately they derive from Yamnaya, but what about the intermediary cultures that led to their emergence as distinct peoples? For example with Celtic, we know that Bell Beaker --> Unetice --> Tumulus --> Urnfield --> Hallstatt.
Corded Ware U106 -> Bell Beaker
?
U106 in Central Europe comes from Indo-Germanic Corded Ware.
Vučedol was ancestral to both Steppic Beakers and some Balkan groups maybe.
For fucks sake, can you retards for once stop equating haplogroups to linguistic groups?
>Proto-Germanic Corded Ware.
>Indo-Germanic Corded Ware
>Corded Ware U106 -> Bell Beaker
The Absolute State of Silesia