I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail...

>I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark

Attached: Hawking.jpg (750x563, 66K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Gb2jGy76v0Y
deanradin.com/evidence/Beischel2007.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Beischel2015.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Kelly2010mediumship.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Kelly2011.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/vanLommel2001.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/vanLommel2006.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Greyson2010.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Nahm2011.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Facco2012NDE.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Matlock 2012.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Honorton1989precogMA.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=Vyt15aAatLs
youtu.be/K-eN7uU0MCE
twitter.com/AnonBabble

well i guess he found out now
video related, his last words
youtube.com/watch?v=Gb2jGy76v0Y

>well i guess he found out now
No, user, he's just dead.

even if you're not religious the immortality of the soul (consciousness) is proven fact

Got something I can read on this?

That is not remotely proven fact. It's a fairy tale for children afraid of the dark.

Phaedo, Plato, Descartes

not an argument

No, this is not an argument, learn the difference,

None of them proved that the soul or consciousness was immortal.

you're right, it's statement of objective fact
explain why, citing text examples

that's not how burden of proof works you raving nut

>you're right, it's statement of objective fact
Randomly lying is not an argument.

no, you can just dismiss their arguments for the immortality of the soul by saying "no lol", you actually have to refute the argument

*cant just
i just said it wasn't an argument, then you reassert that it is, can you read?

No you can't just drop a few names and pretend that's the be all and end all. Provide actual proof within their arguments that proved the soul is immortal.

Saying no they didn't is worth as much as you saying they did.

At least for now.

Don't make me do your work for you, go read what they said

>falling for bait this shitty

Attached: 1517813838069.png (469x452, 277K)

>Dont make me actually have to back up anything that I've said
I have and they barely even proved the soul existed as an entity much less that it was fucking eternal. So please provide this proof.

If not, then fuck off.

>they barely even proved the soul existed as an entity much less that it was fucking eternal
back up this claim

Don't make me do your work for you, go read what they said

Just bumping the thread mate, the troll / retard, whichever it is, was useful in that regard.

>bro what they argued was wrong but i cant even explain why lol xd am i an intellectual yet

>Bro I'm not going to back up anything I claim them call out others for not backing up what they claim

If you have a refutation for what plato and socrates argued on this issue, i'd like to hear it. Idk why you want me to restate what they said when you've already read and refuted it.

Because nothing they said even comes close to proving your claim. So I would like for you to post specific proof that the soul is immortal beyond.

>nothing they said even comes close to proving your claim.
explain further why you hold this to be true

>consciousness is immortal even though it is the synergistic effect of an organic structure

There have been several peer reviewed studies on Mediumship as evidence of an existence of afterlife

deanradin.com/evidence/Beischel2007.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Beischel2015.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Kelly2010mediumship.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Kelly2011.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/vanLommel2001.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/vanLommel2006.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Greyson2010.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Nahm2011.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Facco2012NDE.pdf
deanradin.com/evidence/Matlock 2012.pdf

There are a even more when it comes to PSI/Psychic ability.

deanradin.com/evidence/Honorton1989precogMA.pdf

You know mediumship is a magic trick, right?

>check Veeky Forums
>no sticky
>check /g/, /tv/, /int/, /b/, /pol/, /bant/
>no sticky
Guess I'm staying here. RIP

>That is not remotely proven fact. It's a fairy tale for children afraid of the dark
>Got something I can read on this?

Hawking was born on the anniversary of Galileo's death and died on the anniversary of Einstein's birth.

I don't know if there's an afterlife, but God sure acts like there's one with how it trolls the Jews.

youtube.com/watch?v=Vyt15aAatLs

Attached: fatesdevil8.png (1031x689, 985K)

Is there any 2018 studies?

>There have been several PEER REVIEWED studies on Mediumship as evidence of an existence of afterlife

bad analogy

A computer is still functional and "on" even when it's been shut down

The only way to "kill" it is to remove it from the power source entirely

The shut down noise would be closer to him going to sleep, not dying

Why there's no sticky on Veeky Forums?

>[citation needed]

How's the autism going famalam?

Go live on /x/ please. And while you're at it learn how to summon a Succubus and tell the rest of us.

None of this shit is peer-reviewed.

>I need others to think for me

...how is that a rebuttal of what I said?

Not him but you are so fucking retarded holy shit

It is.

>professing themselves to be wise they became fools

GTFO fucking conspiracy theorist /x/ poster /pol/ack who watch the Alex Jones show.

Think critically or see

Alex Jones is pretty funny tbqhwy

bait

youtu.be/K-eN7uU0MCE

What exactly is the "evidence of an existence of afterlife"?
Some schizo's visions?