How is Nordicism any different than Black kangizm?

That's basically how it always goes. The races above accuse the races below of being subhuman idiots, while the races below accuse the races above of being thieves.

news.psu.edu/story/140739/2003/05/01/research/boas-bones-and-race

They most certainly arent tho. Maybe the Sephardi Jews are

Yes they are, ever looked at a PCA?

It isn't

Attached: 1516858223395.png (599x640, 607K)

>news.psu.edu/story/140739/2003/05/01/research/boas-bones-and-race
>Their findings may lead to a new understanding of human races and the origin of certain ancient skeletons, including the recently discovered Kennewick Man, whose cranial characteristics have stirred controversy among anthropologists.
We now has his DNA. He wasn't an European.

Attached: nature14625-f1.jpg (926x454, 62K)

It isn't different in any way, it's just the longest one.
Germans were larping as Romans since first day they sacked Rome.
>Holy
>Roman
>Empire
instead of
>Unholy
>Germanic
>Confederation

They're white

Yet whenever I bring up Ethiopian achievements in Sub Saharan Africa threads, the Stormtards reply with "Ethiopians have semitic ancestry they are not the same as West African niggers!"

Both are Black. What's the difference?
Nords appropiating Rome is exactly like American niggers appropiating Ethiopia or Egypt.

Attached: 0abcb7bd-2a47-41f1-83d5-5140be8699db.jpg (400x400, 22K)

>Stormtards reply with "Ethiopians have semitic ancestry they are not the same as West African niggers!"
Wait, let me get this straight. In order to avoid giving the blacks any credit for founding a civilization, they reply with "they aren't blacks, those are Jews!"

Yes, there's a guy on this board who is convinced Mali was half-white

Aren't ethiopans half-semites tho? I though that's entire premice of cushitic races of horn of africa and afroasiatic tribes.

Attached: Fair nigs.jpg (624x622, 120K)

Ethiopia has a dozen ethnic groups.
Some of them have light semitic admixture.

They are clearly a different ethnic group than, say, Bantu or Yoruba. But they are all part of the construct of "Black" just like Germanics, a different ethnic group from Greeks, are all part of the social construct of "White".

Thus, Germans larping as Greeks is exactly the same as American blacks larping as Nubians. If one group can do it, then so can the other.

Ohnonono AHAHAHHAHAHAH

I am sure that Ethiopians and other East African mulattos hate West African apes with passion.

Just like we Meds hate you Snowniggers

Ethiopians unironically considered western animistic africans near them, as a subhuman animals. But that's probably due to them not being christians rather than being other africans.
Ethiopians use to mass enslave them and were predominantly trading them in arab slave trade(the one were males are castrated and femals used as exotic sextoys.)

I am Italian, nigger. We will have our place in the Sun soon.

Attached: italian_empire_after_axis_victory_in_ww2___part_1_by_1blomma-db2dzq6.jpg (853x936, 165K)

Somalis enslaved millions of Bantu apes and sold them to Arabs. Wakanda is supposed to be in East Africa as well. American Bantu niggers stealing the History of other peoples as always.

What the fuck is with all this Wakanda shit? If I wanted to read about capeshit faggotry I'd be on /tv/

AYO HOL UP
Where are all the ebony girls at???
youtube.com/watch?v=sxn5v1KZWe4

Attached: illustrazione fascista_600x_022c84813857c34b68d5a33a18b9eea7.jpg (600x425, 74K)

At least they had fun while it lasted

It's weird how Boas somehow trick everyone into believing skulls transmutated due to the magic dirt of America. It's like he never thought to explain why African, European, and Asian American skulls tend to be longer, taller, and rounder respectively despite centuries of continuous habitation.

>How is Nordicism any different than Black kangizm?
it's true

Nords are worth something, at least.

East Africans don't have bantu people they have Nuba.

The dominate ethnic groups are Afro-Semitic and might have their origins in Yemen. At various times in Ancient history Ethiopia and Yemen were one kingdom.

Attached: haile_selassie_ier_dr.jpg (1000x520, 49K)

>greeks
>white

WE

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_Ethiopia#Maternal_lineages

>Caucasoid gene flow into the Ethiopian gene pool occurred predominantly through males. Conversely, the Niger–Congo contribution to the Ethiopian population occurred mainly through females.[25]
>Scott et al. (2005) similarly observed that the Ethiopian population is almost equally divided between individuals that carry Eurasian maternal lineages, and those that belong to African clades.
>In addition, Musilová et al. (2011) observed significant maternal ties between its Ethiopian and other Horn African samples with its Western Asian samples; particularly in terms of the HV1b mtDNA haplogroup. The authors noted: "Detailed phylogeography of HV1 sequences shows that more recent demographic upheavals likely contributed to their spread from West Arabia to East Africa, a finding concordant with archaeological records suggesting intensive maritime trade in the Red Sea from the sixth millennium BC onwards."[29]

no obviously cherrypicked photos here

>More recent linguistic studies as to the origin of the Ethiosemitic languages seem to support the DNA findings of immigration from the Arabian Peninsula with a recent study using Bayesian computational phylogenetic techniques finding that "contemporary Ethiosemitic languages of Africa reflect a single introduction of early Ethiosemitic from southern Arabia approximately 2,800 years ago", and that this single introduction of Ethiosemitic underwent "Rapid Diversification" within Ethiopia and Eritrea.[31] The study also went further to state, "Thus, we propose that the current distribution of Ethiosemitic reflects a process of language diffusion through existing African populations with little gene flow from the Arabian Peninsula (i.e. a language shift)."[31]

A little similar, but very different

Nords were Caucasian
Romans/Greeks were Caucasian
Nords were Indo-European
Romans/Greeks were Indo-European
Nords had light hair and fair skin
Some Romans/Greeks had light and fair skin
Nords existed in the same cultural sphere as Romans/Greeks at various times. From the Dark Ages on Europe has seen itself as common people.

Blacks are Negroid
Ancient Egyptians/Carthaginians/Berbers were Caucasian
Blacks are Bantu, Niger-Congo Khoisan Nilo Saharan
Egyptians/Carthaginians/Berbers were Afro-Asiatic
Blacks have dark skin and afros
Egyptians/Carthaginians/Berbers had lighter skin, straight to curly hair, and even gingers
Most of Africa didn't even know Egyptians/Carthaginians/Berbers existed, they have no shared common history

Sure there's the Nubians or the Ethiopians, but most WE WUZ is from west African Bantus living in detroit

Attached: Go back to Gaul you ginger nob.jpg (680x1024, 376K)

>Romans were North Germanics
Retarded we wuzery
>Romans were Latin Indo-European and by definition, Aryan
Fact

Afro-Centrists like to claim a lot more then Nubia and Ethiopia, dude.

nordicism is correct

Tbf larping as egypt isn't exactly too left field going by that user said

Nubians are Nilo Saharan

Attached: tut's great grandfather n78gfiktN91qb07v0o2_500.jpg (423x447, 38K)

>Using ever-expanding classfications to piggyback on others' achievements

Attached: WeWuzDinos.jpg (746x600, 49K)

t. Nordicist

Nice Jewish nose. Hyksos?

Attached: Tut's great grandfather.jpg (480x360, 18K)

idk man

Indo-Europeans weren't the only ones with light hair.

Khoisan aren't black

But will you be as inept as the last time?
Or worse?

Italics are from the same people as the Germanics. They have similar societies and cultures.
But it is a mistake to say that Latins came from Germanics, and that Germanics deserve Latin achievement recognition.

West Africa had wide spread contact with the Mediterranean including the sudanic region and Northern Nigeria

Attached: download (17).jpg (309x163, 19K)

WUZ

Calling Indo-Europeans Aryan is factually wrong. There is no such thing as pure Indo-Europeans and never was.

Nordicism is right.

I was gonna say "fpbp" but then you posted an image which makes a nonsensical comparison of two wildly different states in wildly different historical eras based solely on one borrowing aesthetics from the other

s-so?

retard

I wouldn't say this is true. Both groups were heavily influenced by completely different people.

ittt: butthurt m*Dshits coping with Roman Emperors being predominantly light pigmented

Attached: nordic romans.png (1571x770, 70K)

It's true.

Unreliable sources, also it doesn't mean they were genetically close to Germans.

The point is the Indo-Germanics who later became Romans and Greeks were Nordics.

>There is no such thing as pure ethnicity and never was.
>Therefore there's no such thing as Chinese and Swedes just the human race derp

>Unreliable sources
Maybe unreliable to denying subhuman monkey like you.

>Variations of same Pantheon of gods
>Variations of a common language
>similar trifunctional patriarchal society

Aryan was for the longest time just shorthand for Indo-European. It was Nazis that conflated it with phenotypes.

Nordic is a meme classification and it means nothing.

Indo-Germanics were of the Nordic phenotype.

>Thinking the chinese are one ethnicity
This is your brain on nordicism, kids.

the Aryans were Indo-European, therefore calling Indo-Europeans Aryan in this case is factually correct.

It's a real classification, means light pigmented, long-skulled, progressive individual.

Try again sweetie.

Egyptians shave their hair and glue wigs on to their corpses

They are one ethnicity, futher divided into regional group.

Just like the Germans are divided to Bavarians, Saxons, Franconians et cetera but are all ein Volk.

t. 'geneticists'

>Variations of same Pantheon of gods
Only some gods.
>Variations of a common language
Both spoke an Indo-European language. But this is like saying that Hittites and Germans had a common language. I doubt they would be able to understand each other.
>similar trifunctional patriarchal society
Common in many cultures, not only Indo-European.

>WE
15% of all modern Italians are blonde, number rises to 30% in North Italy. (And this not counting brown hair which is actually the most common hair color in North Italy)

North Italy was always populated by Celtic peoples before it was conquered by the Romans, they have nothing to do with N*rds.

Attached: Italy_400bC_en.svg.png (1280x1525, 277K)

>a branch of indo europeans were called the aryans
>therefore all indo europeans are aryans
that's like saying all afro asiatics are semitic.

If Romans were m*Dshits, their empire would have fallen after less than 100 years.

Monkeys are not able to rule themselves properly, as can be also spotted in the modern world.

Attached: mediterreneanid.jpg (1024x1001, 137K)

Origin of Aryans began in modern Ukraine and spread out because Aryan societies were highly efficient.
I'll not so certain about exact phenotypes, but ever IEs went, you found le Nordic features at least in their upper class (like Vedic India and the Tarim Basin)

>15% of all modern Italians are blonde, number rises to 30% in North Italy
So you are just proving me that Italians have Nordic (Roman and Celto-Germanic) heritage?

Thanks.

Celts are not Nords nor G*rmanic.
Keep crying G*rm.

He hates genetics because it's proving him wrong again and again.

Nope, the oldest Nordic skull are found in Northwestern Russia in Eastern Hunther-Gatherer societies.

Then some of them migrated southwards, and some westwards, but their major migration was the Indo-Germanic one.

When the larp goes too far

Attached: The most fucked up building in history .jpg (1876x1046, 579K)

that's not a wig and it should be obvious that it isn't, but that's besides the point. Look at the fucking nose, the forehead.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maiherpri
this guy however, was interred with a wig
pic related

Attached: maiherpri mummy being scanned to CT scan.jpg (575x433, 69K)

Original Celts were Nordics.

Skulls found in the Hallstatt culture (Proto-Celtic) are distinctively Nordic, and the classical Nordic type is even called "Hallstatt Nordid" because of that.

Try again, sw*Rthoid.

Attached: prehistoric races of europe.png (1640x1446, 1.72M)

>Only some gods.
The vast majority, and almost every important one
>Both spoke an Indo-European language. But this is like saying that Hittites and Germans had a common language. I doubt they would be able to understand each other.
They spoke variations of the same language. Mutual intelligibility is not what matters here.
>Common in many cultures, not only Indo-European.
And a highly dedicated feature for Aryans, most importantly, they have this because they are Aryans.

Proper genetics are alright....

Some pointless bullshit or jude/polack propaganda can go fuck itself :)

Please, show me the 'genetic' evidence that the chinese are one homogeneous ethnic group, and that 'aryan' is not an ambiguous term used by deluded snowniggers.

You mean in those guys with Siberian and Caucasian genes? You know that your "Nordic" is literally just a mixture of Western Hunter Gatherers, Caucasus Hunter Gatherers and some Siberians? One of them was even J2.

We can't talk the Aryan ethnicity based on skulls.
Ethnicity is determined on society and culture.

>all indo europeans are aryans
I didn't imply that, it's you who's implying calling all Indo-Europeans Aryans is factually wrong when in fact the Aryans themselves were in fact Indo-European.

So who is the Germanic version of Apollo?

source it isn't a wig